The BBC American Civil War

The BBC American Civil War

 

By Thomas Heath

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the end, the BBC American Civil War (of the 1800s) would shoot itself in its own penis.

 

 

 

 

 

BBC: Britain’s BBC news network

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You see, what he did, was something very very clever: he put an ‘in’, where the word and term ‘through’ could’ve gone.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You see, what he did, was something very very clever:

 

Instead, of just using the word ‘word’ or just using the term ‘term’, as pertains �" lecturers love that word don’t they, ‘pertains’ �" to the topic of how the BBC American Civil War shot itself, he used both.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You see, what he did (this is the last one, I promise), was something very very clever:

 

As pertains, to the topic of the BBC American Civil War shooting itself, and by extension (you see what I did there, because it’s funny) its (the topic’s) pertinence identity, he used the identity of lecturer instead of academic.

 

 

 

 

 

Okay: now time to move on

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Before moving on, there is the gist. The gist, is that if the willy man had used ‘through’ for the sentence, instead of ‘in’, there would be a problem; conflation.

 

 

The conflation �" namely, that the penis, the very penis would be able to be mistaken for the gun, being used by the BBC American Civil War.

Thank f**k �" the gist is over.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For what he did. That’s the one and true pleasure you see: for what he did, the what he did being to do with the cleverness, of the chosen semantics.

 

Do you want to hear about something, very clever?

 

 

 

 

God, is a faith system. A faith basis. A faith reality.

 

Faith, to be non-shrewdly blunt about it, is a reward system. A reward idea.

 

Reward, then, is a capitalist system. A capitalist idea.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capitalism: its reference, isn’t superfluous. Its choice, isn’t bullshit. Capitalism, in a nutshell, is about an equality of trades �" ergo, an equality of movements.

 

Being this way, being this art of deduction, God is figured out: God is arse-whipped.

 

 

The gist (just in case you’re a f*****g idiot, and I’m not): equality of movements, the evidence against God’s existence, is to do with the basic idea, that God should be not holding faith to ransom against God freely moving toward reality, as and when reality moves toward God.

 

 

 

The argument, about God, in this story; despite its moral strength, it still needs to lose to what he did’s own brand of strength.  

 

 

 

The BBC American Civil War; in the end, it shoots itself in its own penis, aka it shoots its own penis, in order to enact its own death.

 

To get there, to reach this point of philosophy, What He Did needs to unify with the list.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The list:

 

 

The British economy’s Amityville Horror House

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Once unified, with the British economy’s Amityville Horror House, the bedtime story What He Did by the willy man (thank you Neve Campbell, for listening), and by extension the BBC American Civil War, can use its defeat of God, in order to locate the origin of the American suburban housewife extramarital affair metaphor videogame.

 

 

In the end, the BBC American Civil War shot itself in its own penis.

 

(As stated, previously like a statesman).