An interesting piece, but some of the word choice and sentiments expressed are hopelessly antiquated. I mean, really, ''twas'? It's possibly useful in a period piece but even there there's still a draw to just write in normal language (which I personally don't agree with, but it's a nod to utilitarianism which I can't complain about). Here the use of this horribly old language cheapens the relative value of the piece, which is a shame given how well the rest of it is written. A few notes - line 11, 'like cancer' plainly seems a little weak, you might wish to expand on that thought a little. It's a wonderful metaphor and there's a lot you can do with it, instead of just leaving it hanging and throwing it away as you do. The ending as well is a little lackluster and indecisive. I would have much better liked to have seen something with a little more emotional force behind it instead of flowery language that, when you get right down to it, doesn't really mean much at all. Don't get me wrong, there's a great deal of good work here, there's just a few glaring points detracting from the rest of the work.
Posted 11 Years Ago
1 of 1 people found this review constructive.
11 Years Ago
Thank you! Sorry about the language, that's just my style. I'll learn to work with it as I continue .. read moreThank you! Sorry about the language, that's just my style. I'll learn to work with it as I continue to grow as a writer. It was originally longer but I felt upon review that it didn't contribute to the piece at all, it just made it more cluttered.
11 Years Ago
I also feel that the opened end allows readers to process and relate to it in their own way.
An interesting piece, but some of the word choice and sentiments expressed are hopelessly antiquated. I mean, really, ''twas'? It's possibly useful in a period piece but even there there's still a draw to just write in normal language (which I personally don't agree with, but it's a nod to utilitarianism which I can't complain about). Here the use of this horribly old language cheapens the relative value of the piece, which is a shame given how well the rest of it is written. A few notes - line 11, 'like cancer' plainly seems a little weak, you might wish to expand on that thought a little. It's a wonderful metaphor and there's a lot you can do with it, instead of just leaving it hanging and throwing it away as you do. The ending as well is a little lackluster and indecisive. I would have much better liked to have seen something with a little more emotional force behind it instead of flowery language that, when you get right down to it, doesn't really mean much at all. Don't get me wrong, there's a great deal of good work here, there's just a few glaring points detracting from the rest of the work.
Posted 11 Years Ago
1 of 1 people found this review constructive.
11 Years Ago
Thank you! Sorry about the language, that's just my style. I'll learn to work with it as I continue .. read moreThank you! Sorry about the language, that's just my style. I'll learn to work with it as I continue to grow as a writer. It was originally longer but I felt upon review that it didn't contribute to the piece at all, it just made it more cluttered.
11 Years Ago
I also feel that the opened end allows readers to process and relate to it in their own way.