Norbert Inkstain’s Theory of Axion Particle Relativity

Its complicated...just read...you'll get it.

Norbert Inkstain’s Theory of Axion Particle Relativity

In the realm of theoretical physics, there exists a lesser-known, yet equally profound theory, known as Norbert Inkstain’s Theory of Axion Particle Relativity. This theory, often overshadowed by Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, is a humorous take on the complexities of the universe.

According to Inkstain, the universe is not governed by the speed of light, but by the speed of magic, represented by the formula:

M a g i c = △ A P 2 ​

Here, AP stands for Axion Particles, the fundamental particles of magic, and �" (triangle) represents the three corners of the universe: Reality, Imagination, and Absurdity.

Inkstain postulates that magic, unlike light, does not travel in a straight line. Instead, it zigzags between the corners of the universe, creating a path that Inkstain refers to as the “Path of Absurdity”. This path, according to Inkstain, is the reason why magic can make the impossible possible.

Furthermore, Inkstain’s theory suggests that as the number of Axion Particles increases, the amount of magic in the universe also increases. However, the increase is not linear but quadratic, as indicated by the AP^2 in the formula. This means that a small increase in Axion Particles can lead to a significant increase in magic.

On the other hand, the �" in the denominator of the formula suggests that the amount of magic is inversely proportional to the size of the universe. As the universe expands (i.e., as the triangle gets bigger), the amount of magic decreases. This, according to Inkstain, is the reason why we see less magic in our daily lives as compared to the tales of old.In conclusion, Norbert Inkstain’s Theory of Axion Particle Relativity provides a humorous, yet thought-provoking perspective on the workings of the universe. It reminds us that the universe is not just a collection of stars and galaxies, but a place full of magic and absurdity. And who knows, maybe one day, we might discover that Inkstain’s theory is not as absurd as it seems.