I love your writing. Please join us at http://poeticvoice.ning.com/
We are an online writing community that provides writers with the feedback, motivation, and advice needed to achieve their writing goals.The Poetic Voice Community is fast and easy to join, and you will not get lost in it's easy maneuvering features. We here at Poetic Voice also hope to grow as a community of friends. Our intention, and wish is to learn and share with others. Basically we believe an open mind, and heart can promote growth. We hope to gain an understanding that can stretch and reach around the world.
It's very well written for the most part and you do have a point. I do believe, however, that parts of it read a little rough. But that's okay. I really like this! Great write!
Such deep questions that explore the very nature of our lives. Your responses voice an overwhelming angst and pain in the experience of the world.. Deeply moving words.
Well this poem of basic inquiries is a kind of shell game without a prize.
The search is not unusual, but without a subtler ear to the paradoxes of language, nothing gains ambient traction. Hell, there are even recognized "poets" (Ashbery) who seem to have mastered the external politics of perception more than the inner mysteries of free poetics.
The first example that comes to mind is a stark statement by the spiritual adept Adi Da: '"I' is a koan." There is nothing more stripped and enigmatic than that. Contrast that statement w/the dithering of Descartes: "I think, therefore I am."
Like, really? Thoughts arise like clouds in a mysterious sky of mind -- why is there any "therefore" at all about that? There isn't. Hence the schizoid western scientistic (the cult of pseudo-inquiry) enterprise.
When Da says "I" is a koan" he is reminding the listener that "I" is a mental construct, a fleeting physiology egoically labeled, a paradox of identity, since inquiry reveals a Consciousness stripped of identification w/thought, self, form.
In a word, we don't know what anything is, in its unlabeled beingness, nor shall we ever. However, taking that peculiar reality seriously enables us to grow more accustomed to simply observing mind without identifying w/the bees in the bonnet. Science only does this w/objects apparently outside mind, narrowly. Subjectivity is where all the real work is, as per Buddha.
So. My, I've gone a frickin' core tangent.
You can't struggle to find meaning. You get quiet and it finds you.
Confusion is indeed a trick of the mind, and disillusion a sleight of hand. The same is true of faux clarities.
It's hopeless, really. But there is a crazy wise joke awaiting the absurdist poet.