Tribalism WithinA Story by pia The need for security and a sense of belonging are natural
human desires. The requirements are satisfied when individuals with similar
mind sets and customs come together and amalgamate themselves into one
homogenous group. Hence, the formation of tribes started a thousand years ago, during
the Neolithic era (Stone Age), when primitive
man showed early signs of development. The natural instinct for safety
developed through the notion that man was safe in the company of another person
or a group, similar to the notion that people tend to feel safer when they
enter a dark room together rather than entering individually. People within tribes show a social connection to one
another. That very struggle for a sense of purpose and an identity is what
pulled people towards joining tribes in the olden days. In a book named
‘Tribe’; written by Sebastian Junger, it is noted that decades before the start
of the American Revolution, some American settlers found themselves joining the
Native American tribes. According to Benjamin Franklin, rarely did any Native
American choose to join the foreigners on that land. What the foreigners saw
was the heroism and freedom found within those tribes despite adopting PTSD due
to on and off wars. Early human need for raw freedom was satisfied by tribal
behaviour regardless of the backwardness they displayed. Being part of a tribe slowly started gaining importance.
Tribal behaviour meant: to protect ancient cultures and religious beliefs,
which were seen as sacrificial duties to those who were a part of one. These
duties still carry the same importance to the tribes striving in today’s modern
world. Tribes are described as a group of people ‘who have followed ways of
life for many generations that are largely self sufficient’ by anthropologist
Stephen Corry. The leader is chosen according to personal charisma and
leadership skills by the tribal people themselves. They don’t feel obliged to
rules and regulations laid down by government systems, which gives them freedom
and a motive to achieve self driven accomplishments within the tribe. The subcontinent is a region well distinguished for
embodying a vast spectrum of cultures and tribes. Pakistan shelters a large
number of disparate tribes that add historical significance and cultural
richness to the country. Ancestors of
these tribes originated from different locations before they settled in to the
area, bringing along with them unique customs and traditions. The oldest recorded history of ancient tribal settlements in
Pakistan was of The Soanion tribe. They were people residing in the Soan Valley
near Islamabad fifty thousand years ago. Tribal behaviour continued after them,
forming various different tribes in different locations with only a few
dominant ones. The Huns were violent barbaric nomad tribes men settled in
northern Pakistan. The ‘White Huns’ arrived in ancient India in the fifth
century bringing with them fierce wars and barbarism. They introduced the
belief of fire worshipping into the subcontinent which was in later times
destroyed by Muhammad Bin Qasim and his army of Arab soldiers. A part of these
invaders called themselves ‘The Arians’ and settled down in the areas of Sindh
and Punjab to become a tribe solely dependent on agriculture. Aspects and cultural traditions, in minute hints if not
blatantly obvious, have seeped into modern day Pakistan. These ancient tribes
have transformed into much larger ones that dominate the country’s politics,
economy and social status. The Punjabis, Sindhis, Muhajirs, Balochis, Pashtuns
and various others which hold valuable ancient history and are given polity in
government affairs of the country. In villages and rural areas, tribes and nomadic clans still exist today. However, individuals in cities, despite living progressive modern lives, are still devoted to their tribal heritage. The basic desire to belong to something or to have an identity, keeps people from detaching themselves from the grips of tribalism. A sense of purpose is developed when one feels the need to protect cultural traditions and beliefs, and that duty is fulfilled by staying with one’s tribe, be it physically or mentally Sometimes, that purpose leads to violence. Recently, on April 16th, three people were killed and six were injured when an armed conflict occurred between two tribal groups in Balochistan over insignificant dissensions. Before the creation of Pakistan, tribal affairs were rarely
interfered with and barely interacted in every day politics. After the
partition of the country, interactions of different ethnic groups increased
violence and rejected the idea of being controlled by foreign bodies (in this
case, the migrants from India). Many tribes saw themselves as important and
powerful as others. Ethnic violence sprung up in Sindh in 1952 between two
major groups; the Sindhis and the Muhajirs. In 1985, Karachi’s deadliest wave
of violence erupted when a college student, Bushra Zaidi, was killed in a
traffic incident by a truck driver belonging to the Phatan ethnicity. The
incident sparked conflicts between the Phatans and the Muhajirs, making Karachi
the hub of violence. Tribal instinct and protection came to the people
naturally. It felt like a duty to protect one’s sect leading to constant riots and ethnic violence across the country. Tribalism isn’t always seen in its primitive sense. It can
be seen in governmental and political affairs. It also can be seen in
Pakistan’s youth and has widened the ethnic divide amongst those who live in
the country. Smaller tribes are faced with inabilities to overcome the power
and influence spread by dominant tribes. These dominant tribes have managed to
take over almost everything in the country, from politics to simple businesses in
the local markets. However, the bigger these tribes became the more their
people got scattered. The dominant tribes became progressing and congruent to
the modern civilised world. The scattered progressives however, still tend to
show loyalties and attachments to the cultures and traditions their ancestors
were once a part of. Nationalism for the country and nationalism for a specific
tribe is becoming hard to decipher. We
can see tribalism as something that has seeped into the mind of the modern
progressive Pakistani. Completely removing tribal sentiments is a strenuous
effort. Accepting the cultural diversity and working on protecting the
interests of different tribes can lead to some form of tolerance if not unity.
Allowing the violence to occur in a country comprising of a large number of
tribes is unfavourable for the country itself.
And in Pakistan failure to stabilise tribes is a failure to stabilise
the country. © 2017 piaFeatured Review
Reviews
|
Stats
1497 Views
17 Reviews Added on May 23, 2017 Last Updated on May 23, 2017 Author
Related WritingPeople who liked this story also liked..
|