![]() THE DEMAND FOR ENERGYA Chapter by peppino ruggeriI now turn to the
future, focusing first on the demand side. I start with various dimensions of
energy consumption in 2021 and then I analyze the forces that drive energy
consumption over the following 29 years. Dimensions of
Energy Consumption in 2021. The percentage
distribution of world energy consumption in 2021by selected country groupings
is shown in table IV-1 and is compared to the shares of the population. In four
of the seven regional groupings, the share of energy consumption exceeds that
of the population. The largest ratio of
the shares is found for North America (Canada, the United States, and Mexico),
a region that in 2021 consumed close to 19 percent of world primary energy
although it accounted for only 6 percent of the world population. Compared to
the entire continent of Africa, North America consumed 3 times the energy
although it had roughly one-third of the population. High ratios are also found for Eurasia and
the Middle East. Among this group, the lowest ratio of shares is found in
Europe where the share of energy consumption exceeds the share of the
population by only 51 percent. Among the remaining regional groups of
countries, the highest ratio is found for China where the share of energy
consumption is approaching the share of the population. The lowest ratio is in
Africa whose share of energy consumption is one-third of its population share. The second part of
table IV-1 contains the ratio of shares for five country groupings based on
real GDP per person (GDP, PPP US $2017). Starting with a mean value of GDP of
$17,760, I selected the following boundaries for the five groupings. Top group:
GDP per capita in excess of twice the mean; upper middle: 50% above mean to
twice the mean; middle: mean to 50% percent above mean; lower middle: mean to
50% below mean; low: less than half of mean. We notice that in 2021 the top
income group of countries consumed 40 percent of the primary energy supply
although it accounted for 14 percent of the population. At the other end, 21
percent of the population consumed only 6 percent of primary energy. Comparing
the top two groups with the bottom two bottom ones shows that 19 percent of the
world population (those living in the higher income countries) consumed more
than twice the primary energy of 59 percent of the population (those living in
the lower income countries.
Table IV.1 Shares
of Primary Energy Consumption and of Population by Selected Country Grouping,
2021
Region
Percent of
Ratio
P.E.C. Population North America 18.26 6.41 2.85 United
States
14.98 4.28 3.50 South and Central America 4.67 6.67 0.70 Europe
13.49 8.93 1.51 Eurasia
6.74 3.21 2.10 Middle East
5.70 3.02 1.89 Africa 5.97 17.51 0.34 Asia
Pacific
45.17 54.25 0.83 China 25.70 18.16 1.42 India
6.47 17.78 0.36 Japan
2.70 1.60 1.69 GDP per
Capita Top
39.93 14.41 2.77 Upper Middle 8.37 4.32 1.94 Middle
29.47 21.94 1.34 Lower Middle 16.22 38.53 0.42 Low 6.01 20.80 0.29 Source: Author’s calculations based on IEA (2022), World
Energy Outlook 2022, Table A-5, p. 450 (Total Energy Supply, Stated
Policies) and Table B-1, p. 464; The World Bank (2023), GDP: PPP (Constant
2017 International $), data.worldbank.org/indicator/ NY.GDP.MKTP.PP.KD
Table IV-2 shows the shares of primary energy
consumption by major final demand sector. We
notice that in 2020 the industrial sector used one-third of primary energy
consumption, as defined in table IV-2. An additional 21 percent was used by
transportation. This sector can be viewed as ancillary to all other sectors and
includes the transportation of raw material to industry and finished products
to wholesalers, the distribution of final goods to consumers, and the
transportation of people. While in the first two functions transportation is a
necessary input in the production and distribution of final goods and services,
in the transportation of people it involves a high degree of discretion. Nearly
one-quarter of primary energy was consumed by the residential sector (lighting,
domestic equipment and appliances, and space heating and cooling).
Table IV-2. Shares of Primarya Energy
Consumption by Final Consumption Sector, 2020
Sector
Share (%)
Industry
33.1 Transportation
20.6 Residential
23.0 Commercial and Public Service 10.8 Otherb 12.5 Total aIt
represents domestic demand and includes final energy demand plus electricity
generation and transmission losses, and oil refinery transformations; oil
refinery transformation was assigned to the industry sector while electricity
losses were allocated according to a sector’s consumption of electricity bIncludes
energy used in agriculture, fishing, forestry, and unspecified industries. Source: IEA
(2022), World Energy Balances, XLSX Tables; IEA (2002), Key Energy
Statistics: Final Consumption. Table IV-3 presents some indicators of energy consumption by region. Over the 29 years from 2021, the IEA projects that under the Stated Policies Scenario global primary energy consumption will increase at an average annual rate lower than that of the population (0.59% versus 0.74%), but there are wide regional variations in this relationship. In North America, energy consumption is projected to decline. Still, by 2050 this region will account for a share of global energy consumption nearly three times its share of the population. A faster rate decline in energy consumption is projected for Europe. As a result, is share of energy consumption is converging to its share of the population. In Eurasia, energy consumption is projected to remain flat. Despite the moderate increase in its population, its ratio of energy-population shares will remain the second highest at a value in excess of 2. Inside the Asia Pacific region there were conflicting forces by sub-region. A large decline in population of Japan and a smaller one in China will be balanced by a large increase in the population of India. Correspondingly, flat energy consumption in China and a decline in Japan will be offset by a large increase in India, leading to an above-average increase in energy consumption. By 2050, this region will have a share of energy consumption equal to that of the population. The largest changes are projected for Africa, where both population and energy consumption are projected to rise by about 2 percent per year, 3.4 times the global growth of energy and 2.8 times the growth of the world population. Table IV-3. Changes in Indicators of Energy
Consumption: 2021 to 2050 Region Energy Consumption Population Ratiob
Change Share Change Share Percenta Share
in 2050 Percenta in Share
in 2050 North America - 0.26 - 3.76 14.51 0.50 - 0.43 5.98 2.43 United
States - 0.44 - 3.78
11.30 0.44 - 0.35 3.93 2.88 C./S. America 1.27 1.10 5.77 0.48 - 0.47 6.20 0.93 Europe - 0.58 - 3.65 9.84 - 0.05 - 1.81 7.12 1.38 Eurasia 0.08 - 0.08 5.90 0.23 - 0.41 2.61 2.26 Middle East 1.59 2.03 7.73 1.12 0.38 3.59 2.15 Africa 2.00 3.12 9.09 2.07 8.15 25.66 0.36 Asia Pacific 0.68 1.98
47.15 0.37 - 5.41 48.84 0.96 China 0 - 3.71 21.99
- 0.10 - 3.89 14.27 1.54 India 2.003 3.39
9.86 0.70 - 0.87 16.91 0.58 Japan - 1.01 - 0.97 1.73
- 0.60 - 0.52 1.08 1.60 World 0.59 0.74 aAverage
annual percentage change from 2021 to 2050; bRatio of energy
consumption share to population share in 2050. Source: Author’s calculations based on IEA (2022), World
Energy Outlook 2022, Table A-5, p. 450 (Total Energy Supply, Stated
Policies) and Table B-1, p. 464
The level of
energy consumption (EN) is identically equal to (1) EN = EN/GDP x GDP/P x P where GDP is real
gross domestic product and P is population. According to
expression (1), the growth of energy consumption is determined by the
combination of the growth of energy intensity (energy consumption per unit of
GDP), labor productivity (if the employment-population ratio remains constant,
the growth of GDP/P equals the growth of GDP per employed person), and
population. The average annual growth rates of these variables over the period
from 2021 to 2050 are shown in table IV-4. For the entire world, total energy
consumption is projected by the IEA to increase at the average annual rate
slightly higher than the growth of the population (0.59 versus 0.74 percent).
The growth of GDP per person, which increases energy demand, is more than
offset by the decline in energy intensity. As a result, energy consumption per
person is projected to decline by about one tenth pf one percent per year. The
interaction among the determinants of energy consumption differs among regions
and countries. In China, energy consumption is projected to remain stable from
2021 to 2050 as the annual growth of GDP per person (3.5%) is totally offset by
a large decline in energy intensity (- 3.5%) and a small population decline (-
.10%). In Europe and Japan, even a below-average decline in energy intensity
leads to a substantial decline in the growth of energy consumption because a
below-average growth of GDP per person is associated with declining population.
In North America, the fall in energy consumption is smaller than in Europe (-
0.26%) although its energy intensity falls at the average rate because its
population is projected to increase by half a percentage point per year. By
contrast, energy consumption in Africa is projected to grow at the rate of 2
percent per year in line with its population growth because the decline in
energy efficiency simply offsets the increase in GDP per person. In India, an
equal growth of energy consumption is determined primarily by a large increase
in GDP per person (growing at more than double the average rate) which more
than offsets a large decline in energy intensity (62 percent more than the
average) and a moderate growth in population. The interactions
among these determinants of energy consumption lead to a wide differences in
energy consumption per capita. In 2021, each person in North America on average
consumed more than eight times the average person in Africa, four times in
South and Central America, and more than three times in the Asia Pacific
region. The average person in the United States consumed nearly ten times
his/her counterpart in India. The projected change in energy consumption from
2021 to 2050 also differs by region. For the world as a whole, the consumption
of energy per person is projected to decline at the average annual rate of
slightly over one-tenth of one percent. A similar decline is projected for
Africa and Eurasia. Much larger declines are projected for North America,
Europe, and Japan. Substantial increases are projected for South and Central
Americas, the Middle East, and the Asia Pacific region. For the latter, the
positive change is caused largely by a large increase in India. Table IV-4.
Components of the Growth of Energy Consumption: 2021-2050 Region Average Annual
Percentage Change
EN/P P GDP/P EN/GDP EN GJ, 2021 % Changea North America 0.50 1.50 - 2.26 - 0.26 221.9 - 0.75 United
States 0.45 1.56 - 2.44 - 0.44 272.8 - 0.88 C./S. America 0.48 1.92 - 1.13 1.27 54.49 0.52 Europe - 0. 05 1.65 - 2.16 - 0.56 117.6 - 0.51 Eurasia 0.23 0.77 - 0.92 - 0.08 173.1 - 0.14 Middle East 1.12 2.08 - 1.61 1.59 138.1 0.47 Africa 2.07 2.03 - 2.08 2.00 26.5 - 0.07 Asia Pacific 0.37 3.23 - 2.92 0.68 64.8 0.31 China - 0.10 3.50 - 3.40 0 110.0 0.10 India 0.70 4.50 - 3.19 2.00 28.4 1.42 Japan - 0.60 1.30 - 1.71 - 1.01 132.1 - 0.41 World 0.74 2.06 - 2.21 0.59 79.8 - 0.14 aAverage
annual percentage change Source: Author’s calculations based on IEA (2022), World
Energy Outlook 2022, Table 2.1, p. 108, Table A-5, p. 450 (Total
Energy Supply, Stated Policies) and Table B-1, p. 464. Table IV-5 suggests that energy consumption per person
is positively related to the material standard of living as measured by real
GDP per person. As shown in this table, the ranking of regions by energy
consumption per person is closely related to the ranking of real GDP per
person. The only outliers are Eurasia and the Middle East, where the economic
structure id dominated by the energy sector. When these two regions are
excluded, the ranking association between the two variables is perfect. Table IV-5. Rank Comparison of GDP per Person and
Energy Consumption per Person, 2021 Region GDP per
Person Energy Consumption
$000s Rank GJ per Person Rank Africa 5.59 11 (9) 26.53 11 (9) India 7.36 10 (8) 28.36 10 (8) C. and S. America 15.00 9 (7) 54.49 9 (7) Asia Pacific 15.16 8 (6) 64.84 8 (7) China 19.41 7 (5) 110.09 7 (5) Eurasia 23.98 6 (n/a) 173.15 3 (n/a) Middle
East 23.99
5 (n/a) 138.10 4 (n/a) Europe 43.21 4 (4) 117.54 6 (4) Japan 45.22 3 (3) 132.10 5 (3) North
America 56.02 2 (2) 221.91 2 (2) United
States 70.16 1 (1) 272.84 1 (1) Source: Author’s calculations based on IEA (2022), World
Energy Outlook 2022,Table 2.1, p. 108, Table A-5, p. 450 (Total
Energy Supply, Stated Policies) and Table B-1, p. 464. Because countries differ with respect to climate,
industrial structure, political organization, and traditions, a more detailed
analysis of the above relationship is more meaningful when conducted for a
single country. I have chosen the United States for this exercise because it is
large industrialized country and it is a heavy energy consumer. Table
IV-6 shows the average annual percentage change in energy consumption per
person (EN/P) and its two major components, energy intensity (EN/GDP) and real
GDP per person for selected periods from 1950 to 2022. Over the entire period,
energy consumption per person increased at the rate of 0.4 percent per year as
the growth of the material living standard (measured by GDP per person)
outpaced the decline in energy intensity.
The trends over the entire period were dominated by the changes during
the three decades after 1950 when energy consumption per person rose by 1.4
percent per year and the growth in GDP per person exceeded the decline in
energy intensity by a large margin. During the following two decades, the
transformation of the industrial structure from goods-producing to
services-producing industries accelerated the strength of the energy intensity
decline leading to a minor increase in energy consumption per capita. The
decline in energy intensity remained strong over then past twenty-two years, but
the pace of GDP per capita fell drastically and led to a decline in the growth
of energy consumption two-thirds of a percentage point. Period EN/P EN/GDP GDP/P 1950-1980 1.39 - 0.59 1.98 1980-2000 0.10 - 2.64 2.74 2000-2022 - 0.67 - 1.83 1.16 1950-2022 0.40 - 1.53 1.93 Source:
Author’s calculations based on EIA (2023), Monthly Energy Review, June
2023, table 1.7, p. 19, and appendix table C1, p. 246. The
transformation of the industrial structure also led to a shift in the relative
shares of energy consumption among the major energy use sectors. In 1950,
energy consumption in the United States was dominated by the industrial sector
with a share close to half of the total. Over the seventy-two years from 1950
to 2022, the shares of energy consumption by the residential, transportation,
and commercial sectors expanded at the expense of the industrial sector. The
latter experienced a decline in its share nearly two percentage points every
ten years, which accelerated to 3 percentage points over the next twenty years,
and subsided to about 1 percentage points over the past 22 years. It seems that
in the first three decades after 1950 the trend in energy consumption per
capita was determined by the increase in output within an industrial structure
dominated by heavy industry. As technical advances and changing consumer
demands lead to a progressive shift in output from goods to services, energy
intensity declined at a faster rate. As the pace of transformation of the
industrial structure slowed down, so did the decline in energy intensity. The
major effect of the industrial transformation was a shift in energy consumption
shares between the industrial and commercial sectors. While the latter lost 14
percentage points from 1950 to 2022, the commercial sector gained 7 percentage
points. Thus, the combination of industrial and commercial sectors lost only 7
percentage points over seventy-two years.
Table
IV-7. Changes in Energy Consumption by Major Sector: USA, 1950 to 2022 Sector Shares of
Primary Energy Consumption (%)
1950 1980 2000 2022 Residential 17.31 20.19 20.69 21.80 Industrial 46.89 41.00 35.05 32.77 Transportation 24.54 25.24 26.86 27.43 Commercial 11.26 13.57 17.40 18.09
Average Annual Percentage Change
1950-1980 1980-2000 2000-2022
1950-2022 Residential 3.28 1.31 0.30 1.81 Industrial 2.29 0.39 - 0.23 0.99 Transportation 2.84 0.89 0.17 1.65 Commercial 3.39 2.45 0.25 2.16 Total
2.75 1.18 0.08 1.49 Real
GDP
3.67 3.37 1.93 3.06 Growth
Rates: Real GDP minus Energy Consumption 0.92 2.19 1.85 1.57 Source:
Author’s calculations
based on EIA (2023), Monthly Energy Review, June 2023, table 2.1a, p.
40, and appendix table C1, p. 246. Transportation
is ancillary to the other sectors. If we assign the transportation of people to
the residential sector, we form a new sector that we may call “household”
sector. In an earlier paper1
I show that with this adjustment the share of energy consumption by the
household sector in the United States in 2019 increased from 21 percent to 37
percent, exceeding the share of any other sector. In that paper I analyze the
two components of household energy consumption " residences and transportation
" and suggest for each component it is useful to distinguish between standard
and optional energy consumption. I
define standard energy consumption as what is needed to satisfy household
needs. For example, the household need in the residential sub-sector is shelter
and household equipment that offer security from the elements and an adequate
level of comfort. Similarly, motor vehicles serve the purpose of satisfying
people’s basic transportation needs. Two opposite trends are notable in the residential
sub-sector from 1985 to 2019. First, there was a substantial decline in the
size of the American household, which fell 6 percent from 2.7 in 1985 to 2.5
percent in 2019. This decline resulted from the high growth of non-family
households which outstripped the growth of family households by a factor of
2.6. Second, during the same period the average size of residential units rose
by 14 percent from 1,846 square feet in 1985 to 2,095 square feet in 2019. The increase
in the average size was due to two main factors: the rising share of detached
units, which increased by 1.3 percentage points, and the increasing share of
larger homes. As a result, the gap between the mean and the median size
expanded from 200 square feet in 1985 to 466 square feet in 2019. In the case of passenger transportation, three major
trends are notable. First, light-duty motor vehicle registrations increased at
1.7 times the rate of the population 15+. In the United States in 2019 on
average each person registered one light-duty vehicle. Registrations also
increased faster than households by a factor of 1.43, and registrations per
household rose from 1.72 to 1.96 between 1985 and 2019. Basically, in 2019 an
average each US household registered two light-duty vehicles. Second, there was
a change in the type of vehicle purchased. In 1980, more than eighty percent of
light duty vehicles (LDV) produced in the United States was a sedan or a
station-wagon. No car SUVs were produced, and truck SUVs accounted for less
than 2 percent of LDV production. Forty-nine years later, the share of cars in
annual LDV production dropped to one-third and that of truck SUVs rose to more
than one-third. The combined production of car SUVs, pick-up trucks, and
pick-up SUVs accounted for nearly two-thirds of total production, 4.5 times
their combined share in 1980. Third, the change in the vehicle mix was
associated with an increase in the weight of all LDVs. After declining from the
mid-1970s to the early 1980s, vehicle weight began to rise steadily. From 1985
to 2019 the average LDV weight rose by nearly one-third (over 1,000 pounds). Some of these changes in the residential sub-sector
and passenger transportation represented optional demand. I estimated that 29
percent of energy consumption in the household sector in the US in 2019 was
optional. Nearly two-thirds of the optional energy use originated in the
residential sub-sector and one-third in passenger transportation. The above
optional household energy consumption was equivalent to 11.2 EJ, an amount to
satisfy the total combined energy consumption of France and Belgium in 2020. At this point one may ask: what gains in the quality
of life are generated by optional energy consumption? This question was
addressed by Jackson et alias (2022). These authors related national per capita
energy use in 140 countries (IEA data) for 2018 to nine metrics of well-being:
access to electricity, air quality, food supply, income inequality, happiness,
infant mortality, life expectancy, prosperity, sanitation. Using “non-linear
quantile regression” to determine the upper limit of the energy constraint on
human well-being, they reached three important conclusions. First, as one moves from countries with low
per capita energy consumption to countries with high consumption, the “average
normalized metric score” first increases rapidly and then it reaches a plateau.
Second, the plateau is reached at an average per capita consumption of 74 GJ,
slightly lower than the average world per capita energy consumption in 2021.
Third, in countries with high per capita energy consumption, reducing this
consumption would lead to “little or no loss in health, happiness, and other
outcomes.” According to the above results, in the countries with
per capita energy consumption in excess of the plateau, a portion of this
consumption is “wasted” because it does not generate any increase in human
well-being. According to my estimates discussed above, in the United States
this waste may exceed ten percent of total energy consumption. A wasteful
approach to life is not confined to energy. It is also evident in the food
distribution, preparation, and consumption.
One third of food production for human consumption is wasted each year
and this waste is enough to feed 2 billion people. In developing countries,
waste originates primarily in post-harvest and processing activities while in
developed countries it is generated largely by consumers and the retail sector2
In the United States food waste is equivalent to 30-40 percent of food
production and id generated mostly by grocery stores and restaurants (40%) and
at home (43%).3 When waste and excessive energy consumption are
included in the evaluation of energy trends, an additional ethical dimension is
introduced in the analysis. This issue will be discussed in more details in the
final chapter. Notes 1Giuseppe Ruggeri, 2022,
“Household Energy Consumption in the United States, SSRN.4275933. 2World Food Programme, 2 June 2020, 5 facts about Food
Waste and Hunger. 3Eco.Logic, “What Does Food Waste Have to Do with
Climate Change?”. Reference Robert B. Jackson,
Anders Ahlstrom, Gustaf Hugelius, Changao Wang, Amilcare Porporato, Anu
Ramswami, Joyashree Roy, Jun Jin, “Human well-being and per capita energy use,”
Ecosphere, ans ESA open access journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3978. © 2024 peppino ruggeri |
Stats
37 Views
Added on April 28, 2024 Last Updated on April 28, 2024 Author![]() peppino ruggeriHanwell, New Brunswick, CanadaAboutI am a retired academic. I enjoy gardening, writing poems and short stories and composing songs which may be found on my youtube channel Han Gardener or Spotify under peppino ruggeri. more..Writing
|