There are great moments, such as the first two stanzas, which are powerful on their own and in the piece. There are also great images and touches, the swirl of slender and incongruous adjectives around the ghost's hands, the delicate crimson flame...
But there are moments that could sing better, or burn brighter, perhaps if they told a little less and showed a little more. The phrase "mine own" in the context of the rest of the language seems a little contrived. The stanza with the line about the undiscovered Picasso left me a little cold - the clinical distance of the comparison is dry when settled next to the passionate colors and feelings of the surrounding lines. Things like that. I love the direct, imagistic language, it gives the poem a sense of mood and intensity, but when the descriptions become detached or abstract, when we leave the world of sensation for the world of statement, it sizzles less.
There are great moments, such as the first two stanzas, which are powerful on their own and in the piece. There are also great images and touches, the swirl of slender and incongruous adjectives around the ghost's hands, the delicate crimson flame...
But there are moments that could sing better, or burn brighter, perhaps if they told a little less and showed a little more. The phrase "mine own" in the context of the rest of the language seems a little contrived. The stanza with the line about the undiscovered Picasso left me a little cold - the clinical distance of the comparison is dry when settled next to the passionate colors and feelings of the surrounding lines. Things like that. I love the direct, imagistic language, it gives the poem a sense of mood and intensity, but when the descriptions become detached or abstract, when we leave the world of sensation for the world of statement, it sizzles less.