Exit- Dark Energy?

Since its detection, "Dark Energy" being sustained has been contentious in the science field. Many articles about it for over 25 years have been submitted, including that it doesn't exist.

Recently, entries via Royal Astronomical Society have brought a model contesting its existence including evidence the team has to back it up. The paper was submitted in Nov. 2024 by David L.Wiltshire, Antonia Seifert, Zachary Lane, et al of New Zealand. An article was released Dec. 20th, 2024, "Dark Energy 'doesn't exist' so can't be pushing 'lumpy' universe apart", the physicists say.

They preface that Dark Energy runs the universe's acceleration via reasons with material density of general relativity and Friedmann's equation which have been followed for 100 years to base their calculations on. The lambda was utilized to explain the ability to have acceleration of the expansion.

The authors claim that with improved instrument sensitivity on supernovae light curves is found the revolution. In short, the authors say that via analysis by many earlier, the expansion is attributed to kinetics. "the signature of emergent kinetics spatial curvature of voids has now been identified in cosmological simulations using full numerical general relativity without" lambda. They note that the strength of the TImescape model readings will be found below the values empirical Statistical Homogenity Scale, SHS,

With the void fraction, Fv, they factor in, the voids are found that time travels much faster than in cosmic material conditions which is said to be more pertinent than current models for explaining the acceleration phenomena and perception.

This could affect values at the early and current situation of the cosmos. It could reveal a better analysis by using TImescape by which to gauge, since it would address information gathering from a more uniform source. They say that there is no Dark Energy that accelerates the cosmos but rather it is through the voids  where times moves comparatively faster that the perception of acceleration occurs.

The principle paper alludes to further studies on its theme to be done, e.g. peculiar motion and expansion.

The paper of Wiltshire and Seifert, et. al, does not show a comprehensive covering of the cosmic landscape. Several features included for cosmic completeness  are not addressed therein directly. For example, S8, the lumpiness measure alluded to in the Dec. 20th article is not discussed in either published issue.

.................................................

A cited, supporting paper can be found:

"First investigation of void statistics in numerical relativity simulations"

Michael J. WIlliams, released in Dec. 2024