What is reality, fu

Sources provide more input coming to understand reality.

This may range from vernacular and naïve ideas to various depictions in theory and potential models and their efficacy.

Usually humans start with the commonplace sources in vernacular. Like relying on the input from senses to be the first source that impacts, although they also can extend that, for example we don't live alongside the many stars but we can see them. That may lead toward some naïve reasoning. Some are satisfied that tangibles provide reality.

Some of that may be further augmented toward some refinements with the advent of microscopes and telescopes which may expand the perimeters of what may be known to comprise reality. Analysis of assumed, given data eventually sent the scope of composition more into interconnections as assumed ideas on never ending pursuits and levels of categorizations. Is it tangible to comprehension or abstract? Many attempts by theory and computer simulations are used to draw out what may be reality or identify characteristics of it. Can it be part of our experiences, measured?

Science has measured into the trillionths, for what practical worth that is, and still have not come to any resolve of ultimate nature.

Yet, others have wondered how secure that information is toward making a basic case of reality, or is there more or some other way of searching for verity. Others wonder whether there should be any definitive reliance on what we assume or pursue. Is reality anything we can recognize or live with? Is 'reality' itself an intrinsic or distinct nature, or is it described by an sundry of changing elements at total random or otherwise? Is reality the same everywhere?  Is it in some way prefaced?

How do we come to get to comprehend it or what, and understand our relation with it? 'If you want a theory of everything where it all fits, I see no hint that we're close-zero', voices Carlo Rovelli.

Many, many have tried to give voice and definition. Or, are we asking the right questions by which to proceed?

Daniele Oriti indicates the term is frustration. 'I sympathise, but get used to it.' Reality, it seems, is truly beyond words.

Phase transition, fundamentally indescribable. Even the word 'before' is inaccurate, says Oriti. 'The notion of time ceases to apply'. In theory, phase transitions should be reversible. Even 'future' doesn't hold meaning.

Or, does everything rest on Nothing? (Like a leaf temporarily floating upon water, or a watery image.) And when what we allegedly perceive or conceptualize reaches their limit, does it perhaps revert back to Nothing?

For Nothing is unconstrained and so any development may or not occur.

[Here, also, at this realization, all learning comes to a full STOP!! There is nothing to learn toward reality.]

There are presently, of course, proffered many other takes on reality by others.