X17-real?

Comes again in recent time that there may be evidence of a cosmos phenomena called fifth "force". Presently, it has been held there are four fundamental "forces" within the known universe.  The four fundamentals are: gravity, electromagnetic, strong and weak, each supported by bosons.

The possibility of a fifth fundamental "force" rests in part with findings that all measurements of the known universe's activities do not totally add up to 100%. Present models might not provide the data to complete a whole picture and hence there is some room for other solutions to come forth. The Standard Model, which does not admit gravity as a 'force', comes up incomplete in explaining goings on known in the Universe via the four fundamental forces.

X17 is a dubbing for a fifth force presence, although hard to discern in particle physics. Some scientists will explore more for substantiating evidence, several sources have reported over some time. Early hints were viewed in 2016.

In short, the earlier workup is derived on beryllium 8 decay, a radioisotope. There is regard on the activity of the nucleus energy transition of the excited  helium nucleus. The angles of divergence seems wider than normal, implying something else additional is at work which affects the decay from the nucleus more so than seen in past studies.

There is now a new device in Italy which may rerun collected data. It is the Positron Annihilation Dark Matter Experiment (PADME). It's results regarding a fifth force may come in 2021, according to the spokesman Mauro Raggi.

Note: the material herein is not necessarily a reflection of entropy of current societies.

Reviews

[...]

This writing is for me too technical and cold. Maybe you can use your imagination to more expore. What kind of impact on humanity it will be if x17 real exist. Are we product of it. Or are we losted children of our own existence?

I think your wrtting can reader more think about life ,universe and everything. Just need to put more emotional imaginery.

This is just my personal option not real review or critic. So don't take too seriously. All the best with your universe.

[JayG]

From Wikipedia: The same group had claimed to find various other new particles earlier in 2016, and abandoned these claims later, without an explanation of what caused the spurious signals. The group has also been accused of cherry-picking results that support new particles while discarding null results.

So, I wouldn't hold my breath.