U-united universe?

Once again, with modern readings, mass and energy. From earlier entries and other opinions of scientists, does the energy and matter ratio stand up to scrutiny or is it time to put it to sleep? On the macro scale of the universe, it has been posited there is interaction with a ratio, E=MC squared. It seemed to establish a reciprocal trade-off of energy and mass that would be part of the universe and could be relied upon. Are energy and mass mutually interchangeable, and with a consistent ratio?

If this is reliant of a ratio of mass, this logically could be questioned. Since the 2000's, the COBE satellite followed by some other readings indicate that there is reduction of star production, as well by GALEX, WISE, GAMA and Herschel satellites' data with studies released in early 2009 which means dissipation of energy for mass production which in turn means there will be less mass that will turn into energy, since the famous formula binds them. Indications are there is not enough matter to halt or reverse the expansion of the universe, and there is less mass now to convert into energy than at the inception. Visible light now only comprises 1% of the universe budget.

Subsequent studies also show the universe really has cut back on star production. With these two major factors in reduction, the famous equation does not live up to its fullest potential and hype, or else there is then evident signs the universe we assume to know is closing shop, in which case the properties of the equation does not apply for all time. The equation may not be found to be strong for application in the diffuse areas of the universe and at the higher energy levels. Plus, in the far future, there will be no more stars that burn, no more nuclear fusion. The outcome is big freeze. The famous equation won't be of much effect then. By then it would be difficult to determine if it has ubiquitous application. It should be determined which is the case, instead of vacillating and diddling on with figures and projection based on those assumptions.

The complete universe. So, why all the quibble about E=mc squared? Is it the whole?

By review, it is about m, m=L/c squared. So, endeavor and equation really focuses on explaining the presence of matter. This is about the story of matter, not necessarily the whole, but our biased homocentric interest in matter. That m=L/c squared, alone, does not exhaust explaining the universe.

Note: the material herein is not necessarily a reflection of entropy of current societies.

…………………………..

Suggested reading: "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Energy Content?", Albert Einstein, 1905.