american articleA Story by neurostar burns"The key difference with the 1943 case is the lack of evidence here that any compulsion has been employed. The school principal and Richard's teacher both attested that no student is required to recite or to stand during the pledge, and Sherman presented no evidence to the contrary. The law itself contains no penalty for refusal to participate." "The Supreme Court ruled in 1943 that no one can be forced to say the Pledge of Allegiance, declaring that 'no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.'" (Sherman, Wheeling Township, Illn., ca. 1979) "It is possible to foster both patriotism and tolerance for those who reject it-" note: the material herein is not necessarily a reflection of entropy of current societies.
© 2019 neurostar burns |
Stats
114 Views
Added on April 20, 2019 Last Updated on April 30, 2019 Authorneurostar burnsPhoenixAboutAvid hot tea drinker, likes seafood and asian eateries and home cooked food including east asian, trail hikes, lecturing, being single, cosmology, sky watching, open natural vistas. more..Writing
|