A new universe calculation?

Much credit is to be given to general relativity on describing the universe. But in recent decades, much more attention is given to the micro universe. Numerous findings, theoretical and observational, have given more depth to the nature of the cosmos than just bodies and gravity, which were useful before. Almost continuous discoveries about particles that are with little or no mass arise. Gravity does not play a prominent role with those. Parts of the universe are depicted as very smooth, so smooth that they don't interact with the mass and mostly positive bodies, e.g. neutrinos, dark energy, and even certain electromagnetic wavelengths. These are pervasive, not limited to mass. They may be more of a challenging frontier than prior endeavors.

These new features of the cosmos coming to knowledge will undoubtedly continue to pull the influence of cosmic studies in different detail and directions For one example, some studies are checking the relation between neutrinos, dark radiation, dynamic dark energy which may derive from dark matter decay.

With these new targets, one of the key measurements, among many, to study their nature is the redshift. It is, however, found that much of what has been researched before on the universe has been accomplished in the low redshift range. To gather pertinent information in the new range with any accuracy, it is found necessary to sensitize readings in the extremely high redshift energy range. While this has already started, it is determined for these measurements that scientists will have to build instruments that are even more sensitive to gather credible data in the high redshift. Example, the LHC is not equipped with proper adjustments to work on the high energy redshift and other particle natures, something better needs to be put into play.

Broadly speaking, there seems to be much more area which is represented by the micro universe and is much more pervasive than bulky matter, if one want to have a complete accounting of the cosmos. At these levels, geometric calculations would be more revealing. For example, we orient nature on direction, but in the quantum levels which are pervasive there is no arrow of time applicable to give direction.

To expand understanding of the nature of the whole, it is advisable to look also for the diffusion of material rather than just focus on concentric objects like condensates.

This illustrates, even more so with quantum but also in the maco scales, that the known universe is not precise, or that there is any plan or purpose or rhyme or reason to the way there are encounters past and present and are perceived. It is not immutable. The orderliness of it is only presumed by us and our brain wiring, as is increasing found by a growing number of scientists.

.