Analysis and Freedom of Expression.

One could wonder if analysis and freedom of expression always complement one another.

Often, free expression is taken at prima facie values.

Analysis can reinforce those prima facie values, but more often because it is the nature of analysis to look more closely at or compare component parts, it tends to disassemble intended or assumed values. Critical analysis can bring to fore inconsistencies of something presented. Analysis results could even obviate an intended expression or value due to more focused examination of a topic or emphasis on a component therein.

Analysis and logic combined can produce strong lines of reason which can even be developed to be befuddling and/or irrefutable. They can produce their own 'truths' which apply at various levels, e.g. Kurt Godel produced a self-referential formula. Some which seem unexpected or incongruent with experiences. Tends to be used for depth sounding posited claims and explore the levels of components rather than surface claims.

Today, certainly strong analytic logics can lead to conclusions of insubstantialness and non-existence of anything, as in philosophy, dialectical analysis, math, cosmology, certain sciences, computer logistics, etc. and even in biology 'tho uncommon. 

Yet, these methods, putatively, are utilized to help extrapolate or further delineate understanding of experiences of the world.

So, whether freedom of expression is free, when considering the resultant expression which winds up ultimately free is expressed not or as non-existence of any form, really expresses the notion of freedom.

Note: the material herein is not necessarily a reflection of entropy of current societies.