Geography of SpaceA Story by neurostar burnsIt is said that our known cosmos is quite large. Observations seem to make it larger everytime we look outward. For decades, physics has been one of the leading disciplines describing this large body. Yet, for all that, it is still incomplete. It seems, among other things, that what is described for the early cosmos is almost exclusively focused on energy and matter. Has the research on the early universe been exhaustive? Would there be other factors that factor in at the beginning which have not been explored or brought to light? Certain, other features may fill in what seems to be absent in research but are not done so due to over focusing on limited factors. Likewise, when viewing the larger expanse of the universe, there yet are being found features that have not been fully anticipated. Perhaps it is appropriate to more prominently include other disciplines for describing the universe. It is known, of course, there are many cataloguings on space and its bodies. At present they are not well integrated to produce a single, comprehensive view. One example is that Judd Bowman, just using a viewing device half the size of a ping pong table with one antenna, called EDGES. is detecting the hydrogen concentrations at the birth of the universe. Judd Bowman, from Arizona State University, had been calibrating in the outback of Australia since 2009. In February 2018, he announced the detection of an absorption signal. It is said that while neutral hydrogen absorbs radiation with a wavelength of 21 centimeters, the universe expansion of billions of years stretched it out to 385 centimeters. Data from planet planner, Gaia, has Adam Reiss and Teresa Antoja speculating about discrepancies of how accurately stars are measured for a 3D map or are there true differences in measuring distance on the Hubble constant. Is there more material to be measured out there? Adam Reiss said, 'Not only confirmed but it is reinforced.' He further said, if the discrepancy is real, it means that something is wrong with our models of the universe's evolution. And it's looking more and more real. Atmospheric dynamics and geography and other approaches by disciplines may aid to filling in details of the universe that are not fully evident with present pursuits. They proceed by different paradigms which may shed light on features not yet fully known.
© 2018 neurostar burns |
Stats
308 Views
Added on May 10, 2018 Last Updated on August 4, 2018 Authorneurostar burnsPhoenixAboutAvid hot tea drinker, likes seafood and asian eateries and home cooked food including east asian, trail hikes, lecturing, being single, cosmology, sky watching, open natural vistas. more..Writing
|