Imagined Cosmos

Adumbration:

Geometry, configurations, numerals, numbers, are they just devised representative designations by humans of the cosmos?

Since the departure of Stephen Hawking in early 2018, there are reviews of many recent conjectures of how the cosmos comes about.  Evidently, the current, dominant ones do not match to the 100th percentile every aspect currently known or understood of the cosmos. This is bore out by results of observations both in space and particle testing.

"It's quite naïve of us to suppose that the laws of nature would take the form that is the most convenient for us.", says Emily Adlam of University of Cambridge.

There are several conjectures that suggest quite a different nature in science which depict the cosmos' aspects derive from a nonphysical state. Some find that they can do away with the presence of matter.

These papers reflect on activities at the quantum level may which mature in the macro level.

The following will be attempted summations:

1) It is proposed in culmination of a recent 2017 paper by Hawking and Hertog that the composition of the cosmos is done in a state of fluid imagined mix with no constraints like we currently tend to assign. Then it appears to us in the conditions that we perceive

Working from Hartles' 'no boundary' layout, it is even feasible there could be found ways to explore parallel universes by holographic constructs .

However, from this paper it should be noted that there is a lot of layout for a state or stage where the quantum combination can detach and operate in a imaginary state with virtually no constraints and then reappear in the classic universe.

Alexander A. Friedmann in early 1920's noted in his works, for world metric, "the interval should be purely imaginary at all points of the world and for all events, having the same space coordinates."

2) By entirely different scientists, similarly has the cosmos derive from a nonphysics composition with little or no known constraints that is fluid

Bei Lok Hu noted that models of warped regions of space-time of fluid looked essentially identical with the dominant models of today and concluded space-time not only looks like it would be fluid, rather, it is fluid. [there is a report developed from a special satellite probe in recent years which illustrated that water element could be present throughout the universe.]

Taking cue from that, D. Oriti conceived atom-like particles may be condensed and grouped in a steam-like way difference. When they were introduced to space-time geometry, the "atoms" resisted being funneled to a squeeze like many current theories say, but rather they bounded away "phoenix-like", which could suggest a ekpyrotic function (which may also be found with brane theories).

The atoms also enter a mix upon which there are not determinate ordinates, it would be no-when and nowhere in relating to the situation of atoms there. What is experienced by us is phase-in atoms*.

With these considerations based on smoothness or quantum scale worlds, it seems that matter is depicted comparatively bulky and cumbersome. It has to be worked around, and such, there is no compelling use of matter's presence in such worlds when it is found other much more refined elements work in the universe. There appears no compelling reason that matter must be formed to fulfill the necessity of a universe.

An aside, it may be this also points to the tendency of make work scientists that dwell so much on the miniscule facts which really don't contribute to the larger understanding, they may shoot past the intended outcome or goal.This could result in by-passing important treatments which could result in contributions by overshooting the scale of pertinent research.

It could be that there is more than a flat universe. The flat universe may be an isolated portion of something much larger that present instruments do not register. It could be that the flat universe is encompassed by a much larger field which to present instruments and calculations appears devoid or extremely sparse or dissipated. In earlier decades, Alexander Friedmann in the 1920's used the term "hypersurface" to depict a universe which is embedded with a larger.

On these subjects, there are of course many others who have addressed these conjectures previously and will be long after.

*neurostar coined the word "phaseoverse" a number of years ago. Meaning a phasic cosmos, it always is going through phases, not static or stationary.

Note: the material herein is not necessarily a reflection of entropy of current societies.