Beginnings, revisited

Presently, most science writings portray the existence of our cosmos as derived from energy at the known inception. But a famous equation has reasoned that energy and matter are interchangeable. Even implies being mutually interchangeable.

It leaves a dilemma. If the cosmos started extremely small and the only thing moving it was heat, then where did it come from? That famous equation implies there must then be the presence of matter, m. If everything then known is at millions of degrees and is radiation or fluid, how can any matter be present? It truly appears irreconcilable. Thus, it seems that matter cannot be the precursor of energy but only the other way around.

Unless, there is another way that matter in a particular state could be the precursor to energy. This could come from a state of unbreakable frozenness, but not an ice floe or block. Super frozenness can produce heat, e.g. freeze burn. Put very shortly, the frozenness state would present the matter but in a way that energy from the frozenness can break off splinters very occasionally from its exterior, whereupon the splinter may provide the matter that energy needs to sprout from and continue on in the way scientists currently trace the beginning of the cosmos. In that way, perhaps, energy and matter may be found interacting mutually.