Guns and Shooting the shooter?

Honorable shooting the shooter in an educational setting? For some communities, if not an assigned patrol, a teacher may or not take training to allegedly deter or shoot an invader. Nice preventive cause? Perhaps many insist that this be done in all or most schools. No one wishes the children harmed by an invader.

The point of watch tho, is the guns. For those who do invade the schools, they are men, and the great majority of those teachers who want to "protect" the school by being able to shoot a shooter are also men. It seems there is a culture of men who like to shoot!! That is not statistically debatable. One should have the trained choice to disarm or simply wound an assailant, for the assailant should be held for future questioning. Consider bullets can go astray even if one constantly practices. Weapons are harmful and produce many victims. Will extra-judicial violence ever be considered civilized?

There may be those who wish to not resort to guns as being protective. Some communities have morals not to do harm and are not obligated to follow potentially violent means. In addition there are, of course, those who follow faithfully established methods of nonviolence of a social system of religion, which some think are a bedrock of this nation and its exemplified, good morals. It seems rather than promote armed camps of a school, they pursue the sanctity of a nonviolence atmosphere over escalatory opportunities. Some of them say, let there be peace and let it begin with me.

                                                                      ADDENDUM

A review of national sources on shootings has strongly linked the mass killers of recent past, including those where their close relations said there were no previous violent tendencies of the shooter, have taken medical prescriptions which are even advertised with warnings that they may lead to changed moods, violent behavior and extreme behaviors.