COSMOS DECLARATION I & III: updates

As of August 2017, further observation and probes by the South Polar Telescope and Dark Energy Survey (DES) collaborative are indicating for the modern epoch and probably future, as opposed to most studies that center on the early universe or CMB, may be advised that the future of the universe is set now and that there may be an inevitable rip. That is dubbed by some scientists as Phantom Energy.

 

New studies of current galaxies and clusters, not the past, indicate that not only may gravity lose to Dark Energy forces but also Dark Matter is being out stretched by Dark Energy. These studies due to their focus, do not match with prior cosmos models and Planck data.  Much of the indications are from the data of the first of five years from DES. They contrast data from the early universe and that of which is accrued for present and future projection. There are, of course, earlier studies on the same subjects done by other researchers.

Most explorations and studies for the universe have focused on the CMB and earliest developments. Perhaps a hot inflation has interceded. Most studies seem to not indicate, so far, for the earliest cosmos that any expansion driven by Dark Energy was present. Although it is indicative that the cosmos did start expansion due to a repulsive energy. Yet Dark Energy has since been indicated after that epoch. Its force has increased its influence on the substance of the cosmos ever more. Because of its later appearance, some scientists describe its activity as a second expansion of the cosmos. If that is precedence, particularly since the cause of the second expansion will is not well understood, will it be the last expansion or will there be more?

The two dark forces seem to share major parts of the cosmos. They are recently discovered. Dark Matter is usually thought of as an attractive, boundary supporting and clumping activity for matter. A preliminary from the recent studies indicate that Dark Energy is stretching the cosmos faster than Dark Matter can aggregate it. That is based on data from studying the positions of galaxies and clusters. One data from the study shows the Planck Satellite giving Dark Matter energy in the early cosmos at 34% but the DES comes up presently with only 26% of the energy of the universe, implying that Dark Matter's influence may be decreasing. This Dark Energy is said also to help flatten the geometry of the cosmos while expanding.

The report is based from data of the 4 metre Victor M. Blanco telescope in Chile. A member of the 400 DES project, Daniel Scolnic provided information. This is also considered by Catherine Heymans of U. of Edinburg in of Dec. 2017.

If untethered, the expansion of the material of the cosmos will continue speeding up and eventually a rip will develop at some point that may sunder clusters, galaxies, star systems and forms of matter including atoms. The only other scenario under similar premise is like the de Sitter "big freeze" of endless expansion and distancing of bodies after the stars burn out their fuel and no longer heat or provide building elements to the cosmos. An essentially atomless cosmos scenarios but may remain a universe.

Indeed, if radiation is gone from the cosmos equation factor and so is matter, what else other than subtle forces would remain in the universe?

…………………….……………………………………..

Alert! Negative energy (not dark energy):

A study on variations of Dark Energy and its density opens with paper of Yuting Wang indicating capacity for other results than have been previously produced. Other ways of measurement find disagreement with Planck readings. Suggests crossing of energy density below -1. Submitted July 2018.

Catherine Heymans conjectures in 2017 development of Negative Energy, perhaps through the quintessence model. Where the density may at time fall below zero to -1 or more as a flux. If it falls below -1, then it will strengthen the energy and its tendency. This might fall under the term Phantom Energy. This assumes dark energy does not remain stable, and hence may induce a cosmic rip at -1 or greater.

This topic also has appeared as a scenario recently with K. Dutta. Ruchika, A. Roy in a paper, "Negative Cosmological Constant with Cosmological data". They confer a possible observational data and work out a crossover of the density to -1 or greater. "This is probably the first time, that there are observational suggestions for the presence of a small negative cosmological constant. Its presence predicts definite observational signatures in large scale structure formation in the Universe..."

Note: The material herein is not a reflection of the entropy of current societies.