E=timeA Story by neurostar burnsE=time (t). Currently, most attention is directed to E=mc2 as if it is the only function on large throughout the cosmos. But how, in addition, does one explain that things move with time? In the past it can be found that time was treated as inert and it was up to some thing to interact with it to provide evidence of its presence or observability. If that is the only way to ascertain a presence of invisible time, then by what is that measured? It may be presumed in our cosmos the observable way we detect time is when some thing interacts and then it can be traced. But how can some thing interact if time needs some thing to trace by? Is time a necessary precursor? Some thing needs in our cosmos to move or there can be no tracing for us. But what can move if it is inert or nonresponsive? No way to detect and measure. It seems the presence or gauging of time is detected only after an event had transpired or occurred. There must be some thing that produces measurable distance. Different from being inert, it is found energy can produce motion. It is said that energy has the tendency to spread out, not contract like gravity. Energy makes some thing detectable, otherwise there would be an unremarkable backdrop with no discernible distinction. In contrast, energy seems to make discernible difference. It follows that time is made detectable to us with energy It may even be said there is energy that causes the motion of time, since it seems by itself it has no motility to spatially relocate. (Time itself is not known to produce anything distinct. If by time itself is to be relied upon as producing the cosmos, then how, precisely, is it found how that came about?) Do modern scientists hold that the cosmos started with acts of energy, big bang and hot inflation, whence time is measured? Is it energy that sparked the universe where after time could then be measured, according to current thinking? Where does that place the relation of time toward nurturing a universe? [A persistent old earth adage from ancient times: Seeding-if one sows seeds on a fertile soil, the seeds will germinate. If one sows seeds on a barren place, well, no matter how much time passes be it millions or billions of years, if the place remains barren despite the passing of time, the seed will not germinate. Time does not appear to be an essential nurturing factor. This may have some influence on modern concepts of the conditional development at other planets, which would likely have more constrained conditions than earth, and even inception of the cosmos.] Note: the material herein is not necessarily a reflection of entropy of current societies. © 2018 neurostar burns |
Stats
435 Views
Added on July 3, 2017 Last Updated on January 11, 2018 Authorneurostar burnsPhoenixAboutAvid hot tea drinker, likes seafood and asian eateries and home cooked food including east asian, trail hikes, lecturing, being single, cosmology, sky watching, open natural vistas. more..Writing
|