THIRD COSMOS DECLARATION-ENTROPY

This is the third Cosmos Declaration

An irrevocable truth has humbly been submitted in science in the year 2016 by three scientists.

For centuries, there has been an open question of the world of science on the presence and functioning of time and the phenomenon of entropy. Do they interact? It is held that entropy provides the drive that makes time proceed in one direction, forward. Second question is whether this link up would be inescapable or unalterable.

Until now, the answer to the above last question has usually been yes. Entropy functions from low to high or vise versa has been deemed an inescapable force of operation, in at least a material universe, at least after being born by a (hot) inflation. This recent paper(s) obviates that and provides solid groundwork for that finding. This may be the very first successful work(s) toward obviating the interplay of entropy and time, at least on the macro level.

Throughout recent centuries, at least, it has been depicted that entropy and time were essential to a functioning universe and typically held that no cosmos or multiverse could function without them. They were a hallmark of physics.

It became traditionally accepted in the 19th century there would be two succinct clauses that describe the Law of Conservation in the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. The first was for the conservation of energy, which soon was counterpointed by others at the quantum level. Nevertheless, a nature of the presence of energy is to expand at least with the macro size. The second declares that the motion of events move in one direction and in this cosmos, they expand the cosmos, which is assigned to entropy and later became referred to as 'the arrow of time', the term is dubbed by Arthur Eddington. It seems the new papers concentrate on the latter clause of the 'arrow of time', but certainly could also have some of the proposal reflect on the first clause.

It becomes notable in the new work(s) that the accepted workings of entropy and time in the context of forward moving are traced in a reverse relationship. Which feature is dependent upon which to produce the implied function. It is not treated as a historical timeline, e.g. back to the utter beginning. It is a study on their interplay as function that has been touted up til now, usually stemming from (hot) inflation.

Whereupon, entropy is what gives time its direction to the cosmos, then the question is what provides the drive for entropy to expand the cosmos. For one directional time to exist, entropy must be driven by something to initiate and sustain expansion of the elements. Something monotonic. Which may make entropy an activity not totally unto its own, as had been worked out in the past with no further exploratory perspectives

In short, there likely will be no one directional, forward arrow of time if entropy does not expand. So the accepted versions of time and entropy having been perceived as subsumed subsequently relegates them to secondary forces. Interaction on the macro level would be rendered negligible. No entropy with directional orientation, then no time. A very tight constraint, at least for growth. Would a cosmos then be only static?
 
Profound in this study that time is dependent on entropy and one directional entropy is driven. Among other implications, that time and entropy are dependent features makes them SECONDARY nature and subsequently unessential to a universe rather than as has been before depicted and treated. It may be evident that entropy and time are not automatically part and parcel an essence of a cosmos.

For our cosmos, it may be that there is a monotonic energy that drives entropy to be one directional. This energy's presence does not provide any certain evidence that the interaction of it with other elements makes the process irreplaceable or inevitable. Typically the term applied to this monotonic force is dark energy or some say cosmological constant in relation to Einstein's derivation. So, at the very least, in this scenario, if there is no dark energy to drive the entropy, then there would be no time as believed for progressing from the beginning.

It may give pause to wonder how much the entropy concept has been occluding other features of the cosmos. The pervasive dark energy has only recently been uncovered which provides the monotonic drive to entropy. Yet it was not considered a factor until recently as 1998 when dark energy was ascertained. And it plays a very large role in the universe which otherwise was relegated to entropy up until now.

As mentioned before on the 2 clauses, the quantum level provides quandary here. At that level, it is believed quantum particles are so small that a sense of arrow of time or direction need not be found necessarily applicable. As to this point, a similar conclusion has been reached by Tobias Schaetz in Germany on his study of ion energy transfer.

A universe need not be subjected to or measured by nature processes of entropy and time

For a long time there have been attempts and papers addressing the arrow of time and entropy. No one seemed to be able to shake the ongoing dominance. The recent submission by three scientists appear to have turned the corner from many speculations of wonder to now illustrate grounds by which one can reason about the presence of processes without having to fall back on factoring in entropy as a background necessity.

In the early  1920's, Alexander Friedmann wrote in his paper, "The World as Space and Time, the monolithic Time is over thrown and becomes computational rather than untouchable as it was previously treated.

This paper is not intended as a review of the scientists' work on time and entropy. Their works are inspiration for those who wish to illustrate the story and physics  of the cosmos without having to base their reasoning on and resort back to those priorly prioritized believed natures.

'The deepest breakthroughs in physics took place when a contradiction forced researchers to re-evaluate their assumptions.', said Nathan Selberg.

Nevertheless, this topic is so special for the current times that at least one reference need be shared with those interested:
"Time Arrow Influenced by Dark Energy"-Physical Review E. 93.052125, 21 May '15.

Another source worth viewing:
rxiv.org 1605.0225.

Note: this is not necessarily a reflection of entropy of current societies.