FEATURELESS FACTITIOUNESS

This is an attempt at treating a specific outcome of this issue, not comprehensive. It will be an attempt to illustrate it.

The pervasiveness of the factitiousness is that it can be so permeating that it marginalizes other methods of gathering data and communication styles. It becomes predominate and therefore a primary choice of gathering arbitrary information and producing typesetting and labeling. Instead of mutual regard, this channels the communicator to depend upon and adhere to such methodology and so strengthens its usage.

The tendency with this method is to create reliance on multiple descriptions on a subject without addressing its essence. This leaves a peripheral, uncentered focus which only deflects and diffuses any approach toward core treatment of a subject. This in turn affects the way the mind trains its concentration. When diffuseness is widespread, the primary subject matter is marginalized and often not central.

 

In this approach, it is common to find the essence of an issue sidelined, averaged, then marginalized. After a period of marginalization, if not readdressed, the issue is further reduced, made into a minority which thereafter can be compartmentalized and not addressed as a whole or part of a whole by itself again. Then the next process is to standardize the result. This greatly reduces any chance of treatment or reconsideration of it due to diminished attraction.

Whole populations become subjugated. People become unfocussed toward addressing issues, thinking they are acting in complicit conformity. Numerous records are illustrated of being unfocussed is history wide.  Populations are subject to having certain characteristics collected and sorted out for them and live accordingly. Hence, populations feel featureless and vastly diminished in their values. Subjugation,using such methodology is found in ancient civilizations with populations rendered helpless, even when adversarial components are vastly outnumbered.

More recent, extreme, obvious examples are in Korea in the 1950's and on, where citizens are selectively oppressed and cowed so they do not resist a protagonist. In the Korean war, this was overcome once when citizens being used as human shields during an "exodus" finally turned on their captors mixed amongst them even at their own expense. Another large example is WWII concentration camps where captors were vastly outnumbered by the victims which yet most did not choose to defy their captors. In a similar contrivance, it can be found many African natives were treated much the same due to arbitrary exploitation of certain information. This tallies the victims just mentioned in this paragraph into millions and millions and will be generations before use of this practice is begun to be constrained due to its accessibility and those who may choose to exploit it to that end as well as being in education and training curriculums covertly and overtly placed.

Other takes and angles on this subject can be found in the past and present.

Note: This is an assay on the entropy of societies of today.