Big Bang Obviated

[From Neurostar]

At present time (2015), most cosmologist circles like to conclude the Big Bang (whatever its real size) exploded into

existence and its presence is without precedence. Most still hold that the universe (at least of what we detect as the

observable universe) expands its frontier with no precedence before it. So they state

that the universe does not expand into anything.

More recent understandings postulate the precedence of our known universe comes from  yet undetected sea(s) of

virtual particles that pop in and out of existence which in some way eventually allow a combination to build without decay and so the building blocks may proceed.

It is irrational to hold that a universe births alone when there must be rudimentary elements to contribute to that composite birth. Further, it is irrational to hold that it is a singular presence, where it is held that there's a whole sea of virtual particles that it arose from. Hence, it can't be determined solitary in that way. In and of itself, the event of the Big Bang is dependent upon the virtual particles for foundation and could not be considered an unique, solo event.

With the presence of sea(s) of virtual particles, not only can there not be a solitary or unique presence, it is neither rational

to declare that universe expands its frontier in an unprecedented manner since the virtual particles would be

everywhere. The sea(s) of virtual particles are not believed to have known boundaries.

In this case, this depicts the universe as background dependent.

If the Big Bang must depend upon being an unique or solitary event, then the occurence of virtual particles and

any way of combination for arising cannot be attributed for the arising of the universe(s). If so, then the chances

of Big Bang occurring again are greatly reduced without there being the sea(s) of virtual particles to accrete.

The Big Bang, as named, further requires a separation. A separation from previously known state of the universe, e.g. dark, unlit and unknown at macro level. That requires thermal ignition. One needs to wait for the combination that allows by chance a thermal ignition from a cold environs. With such odds, it may not be a necessity of a cosmos to have a thermal ignition.

(For further discussion on similar topic, please read "Cloaked Cosmos).