......mesmerizing!! It starts off clunky in musicality, and some of the rhymes feel forced, but the overall result is stupendous. It has a "All Along the Watchtower" feel to it with a little J Alfred Prufrock for some added spice. Those refrains are absolutely brilliant, and they come at the right time, and the ending is simply wow!! There's a je-ne-sais-quoi feeling I'm getting that's saying there could be more to it - some minor tweaking just to get the musicality flowing better - but it could simply be me. BUT, I do have to call you on the F-bomb! Because your poetry is sooooo good, planting this "bomb" blows everything to smithereens. Because that's what bombs do! It's all pretty and beautiful, then the swear ruins it all, because it doesn't really fit in as well as you might think it does. And because it only appears once, it's amplifies the jarring factor by 100%, given it definitely shows it doesn't have to be there. Yes, you could justify its presence by the fact that it's common bar rat language, but it ruins the solemnity that the poem creates throughout its entirety. GET - IT - OUT - OF THERE!! Other than that, brilliant! Tweak the clunkiness at the beginning, and this would be a genuine gem!! Well freaking done!
Posted 6 Years Ago
1 of 1 people found this review constructive.
5 Years Ago
Did you do a thorough edit of this? For I just read it again, and it reads tremendously better!! read moreDid you do a thorough edit of this? For I just read it again, and it reads tremendously better!!
You don't have to take this comment seriously, now, it's just something that occurred to me now that the musicality issue has been dealt with. The musicality is a key part of the poetic experience for the reader, and because the musicality is simply divine now, and the ending is great enough to elicit a catharsis of sorts, the direct dialogue ruins the solemnity of these two "dreaming of the other side". The dialogue is great in its own right, so if you want to keep it, it's your choice. But experiment with this suggestion of sound and powers and then make your final choice:
Combine the two stanzas where dialogue appears, but take out the dialogue:
".....
So that you can hardly see
That it's kind of messed up, aint it?
....."
With that, you still have two men of different classes, sitting together at a bar, but you also have that solemnity of their silence as they (secretly) dream about having what the other has.....and drown their sorrow of being "broken" with the brew they're drinking. The dialogue just ruins the solemnity of the image, and therefore the power of it is undermined. Think about it. If you choose to keep it, that's your choice. This is just something to consider.
......mesmerizing!! It starts off clunky in musicality, and some of the rhymes feel forced, but the overall result is stupendous. It has a "All Along the Watchtower" feel to it with a little J Alfred Prufrock for some added spice. Those refrains are absolutely brilliant, and they come at the right time, and the ending is simply wow!! There's a je-ne-sais-quoi feeling I'm getting that's saying there could be more to it - some minor tweaking just to get the musicality flowing better - but it could simply be me. BUT, I do have to call you on the F-bomb! Because your poetry is sooooo good, planting this "bomb" blows everything to smithereens. Because that's what bombs do! It's all pretty and beautiful, then the swear ruins it all, because it doesn't really fit in as well as you might think it does. And because it only appears once, it's amplifies the jarring factor by 100%, given it definitely shows it doesn't have to be there. Yes, you could justify its presence by the fact that it's common bar rat language, but it ruins the solemnity that the poem creates throughout its entirety. GET - IT - OUT - OF THERE!! Other than that, brilliant! Tweak the clunkiness at the beginning, and this would be a genuine gem!! Well freaking done!
Posted 6 Years Ago
1 of 1 people found this review constructive.
5 Years Ago
Did you do a thorough edit of this? For I just read it again, and it reads tremendously better!! read moreDid you do a thorough edit of this? For I just read it again, and it reads tremendously better!!
You don't have to take this comment seriously, now, it's just something that occurred to me now that the musicality issue has been dealt with. The musicality is a key part of the poetic experience for the reader, and because the musicality is simply divine now, and the ending is great enough to elicit a catharsis of sorts, the direct dialogue ruins the solemnity of these two "dreaming of the other side". The dialogue is great in its own right, so if you want to keep it, it's your choice. But experiment with this suggestion of sound and powers and then make your final choice:
Combine the two stanzas where dialogue appears, but take out the dialogue:
".....
So that you can hardly see
That it's kind of messed up, aint it?
....."
With that, you still have two men of different classes, sitting together at a bar, but you also have that solemnity of their silence as they (secretly) dream about having what the other has.....and drown their sorrow of being "broken" with the brew they're drinking. The dialogue just ruins the solemnity of the image, and therefore the power of it is undermined. Think about it. If you choose to keep it, that's your choice. This is just something to consider.
http://eabulmanbooks.wixsite.com/books
Website!!
Hey I'm Pretty_as_a_poet, but you can call me Emily. I'm a poet, poetry is my passion and possibly the reason why I have been put on this earth.... more..