Thomas, not being familiar with all of the names this piece invokes finds me on the outside looking in, but writing on such a sensitive topic is thoughtful and very compelling. A lot of states in the US are still wrestling with the issue, so it is still a very topical subject and I applaud your open-minded thinking.
Very well done, sir! take care...dan
Thomas, not being familiar with all of the names this piece invokes finds me on the outside looking in, but writing on such a sensitive topic is thoughtful and very compelling. A lot of states in the US are still wrestling with the issue, so it is still a very topical subject and I applaud your open-minded thinking.
Very well done, sir! take care...dan
The legal issues of spousal responsibilities and abilities. A partner IS a next of kin - personally, medically, and legally until a law decided by majority vote strips away their right to have a voice or legacy.
Be told you can't be beside your partner of ten, twenty, or more years ...because you AREN'T family. Lose the only home you and your partner shared for YEARS because your commitment to each the other isn't recognized in a court. Work benefits denied, emergency benefits questioned, credit and purchasing power restricted ...in some countries the phobia goes so deep as to threaten as well as the taking of their lives. Religious morality is NOT enlightening nor tolerant - ever ...but peoples' can be when backed by the structure and strictures of followed and equally-enforced Law. I came back Thomas - seems it ISN'T just about you now - doesn't it.
Interesting to look back on this so long after the fact. I have always scoffed at people who believe that giving people the right to be treated the same as everyone else somehow undermines their own foundations.
I'm looking at same sex relations ... and then marriage ... and I figure ... it works best married to the woman ... and meeting the friend under the moon ... in the mind of self vanity ... i.e. ... if the wife says its okay.
Thomas. Such an interesting paradigm, taking neither side, as it were, until...the day of the vote? By the seat of your pants?? (no pun intended) This is something that borders on the absurd, only because it's a debate at all. No heavy thinking necessary. No hand-wringing. No sleepless nights. Yay all the way. Yes. If the stodgy old whatsits think men and women are going to stop having babies because two men, or two women, want to get married (you know, the original reason for marriage, good ole procreation) then *they* should look at all the children in quote-unquote orphanages and foster homes who need good homes a same-sex couple can, and would provide. Nice write, though...I love anything that gets me riled up ;-)
We have had same sex marriage in Canada and have had it for a while. In builds empathy and understanding and fosters the belief that though we may all be different at some point we are all the same.
To all who know by now - I love you.
For those that don't, I review a lot of work on here, and I expect the same in return, friend me but make sure to have conviction! I'm a horror writer mostly bu.. more..