LOVE'S SONG

LOVE'S SONG

A Poem by Bill Grimke-Drayton
"

An out-pouring of thankfulness of love as a new day of relationship dawns.

"

Through the sun-dappled shade,

pierced by the early dawn,


I listen in new, unchecked freedom,

knowing you sing for me,


from the innocence of day,

as pure water

from an overflowing

well of captivated pleasure,


never exhausting my thirst

for the source,

which created this

divine consonance.


© 2015 Bill Grimke-Drayton


My Review

Would you like to review this Poem?
Login | Register




Featured Review

I think you might be a little over-zealous in you vocabulary in this poem. Mellifluous, languorous, sempiternal--might be a bit much. Especially 2 right on top of each other in the last stanza! Also, I'm not sure you mean languorous. The rest of the poem is very positive imagery, but languorous, at least to me has a negative connotation.

I really like the 2nd stanza--the concept of being freer to listen because it is especially for you is lovely. The 2nd stanza then flows well into the 3rd stanza. I wish the first flowed as well into the 2nd. Mostly, I think it is the first line that is awkward. Your subject and verb are backwards or not quite all there? I'm not sure, but something isn't quite right. Then 2nd two lines, as I said are fine.

Does that make sense? Again, I really like the concept, just a little tightening of word choice!

Posted 9 Years Ago


1 of 1 people found this review constructive.

Bill Grimke-Drayton

9 Years Ago

I'll look at this, and come back with an amended version, for you to look at. I really appreciate yo.. read more
Bill Grimke-Drayton

9 Years Ago

Viola, you will see that I have deleted some words. I hope it sounds better this time. However, any .. read more



Reviews

Again much better. It still doesn't captivate me quite as much as your other poems--but everyone is going to have favorites. I think it is well done, though. I'd consider getting rid of "the" in the first stanza. I think it can read:
"Through sun-dappled shade,
pierced by early dawn,"
I don't think if feels grammatically incorrect, and the words have more emphasis or something this way.

Posted 9 Years Ago


I think you might be a little over-zealous in you vocabulary in this poem. Mellifluous, languorous, sempiternal--might be a bit much. Especially 2 right on top of each other in the last stanza! Also, I'm not sure you mean languorous. The rest of the poem is very positive imagery, but languorous, at least to me has a negative connotation.

I really like the 2nd stanza--the concept of being freer to listen because it is especially for you is lovely. The 2nd stanza then flows well into the 3rd stanza. I wish the first flowed as well into the 2nd. Mostly, I think it is the first line that is awkward. Your subject and verb are backwards or not quite all there? I'm not sure, but something isn't quite right. Then 2nd two lines, as I said are fine.

Does that make sense? Again, I really like the concept, just a little tightening of word choice!

Posted 9 Years Ago


1 of 1 people found this review constructive.

Bill Grimke-Drayton

9 Years Ago

I'll look at this, and come back with an amended version, for you to look at. I really appreciate yo.. read more
Bill Grimke-Drayton

9 Years Ago

Viola, you will see that I have deleted some words. I hope it sounds better this time. However, any .. read more

Share This
Email
Facebook
Twitter
Request Read Request
Add to Library My Library
Subscribe Subscribe


Stats

57 Views
2 Reviews
Added on October 23, 2015
Last Updated on October 23, 2015

Author

Bill Grimke-Drayton
Bill Grimke-Drayton

Nantwich, Cheshire, United Kingdom



About
I was with WritersCafe before, and found the site again. I have completely rewritten the information about myself. So much has happened in the last few years. Firstly and most importantly of all I ca.. more..

Writing