Assessing the scope of intelligence in life.

A discussion about humanity.

Life is inhumane. It's a foolish game, and only the vain, and insensitive want to play it. I think of how evolution took homosapiens, through a series of stages, before the state of intelligent life, and I can picture a tooth, stomach, or headache, hunger, or skeletal/muscular pain. The pain, and suffering endured until intelligence made us wise enough to realize, that an intelligent state is the ultimate pain, and suffering, and that the virus known as life, that evolved into a super agressive organism, is destructive, and should end with the recognition that procreating won't better the situation, it just prolongs imprudence. For, it is imprudent, to add to the vanity of masochism, and insensitivity.
The world is a constant state of war. The efforts of all labors amount to exploitation. The reason for this work, is to point out the degree of mental hygeine involved in building a fantasy environment, through tyranny, and pride, and the grandiosity involved in controlling the globe, for the pleasure of consumership by those enslaved through the impact of being born into a state of conscious, and being indebted to the criminally insane by way of tax, and adversity.
Assessing the scope of intelligence in life means taking a look at the current state of man, and seeing that malicious conduct is not intellectual. You mustn't reproduce to support malicious armies. Today's entity needs murderers for gangs, thieves for white collars, prostitutes for terrorism, and they draft your young as soon as they're born.

Would a madman do this?" - Edgar Allen Poe.

Author's Note

I came to the conclusion that life is vein based on the premise that reproduction is done at a codependent rate only to gratify ones need to cater to or be cartered to. In any ways having ambitions isnt helping society any, when all are taught that acceptable is a state of dog eat dog, and not a state of peace and law enforcement.

About intelligent life, I took a pathological look at the vicious cycle of evolution which is a chance survival of species through reproduction, and didn't state the obvious by saying it's a simile comparison of primitive, and historic pain, and suffering leaving the ones who pride in calling themselves intelligent to realize that no existence is a good existence, and reproduction only produces pain, and suffering unless proven otherwise.

I do believe my viewpoints are reasonable as I find that society insults my intellect on a daily basis, and I hope your not bitter about my suggestions on reaching a greater Utopia.

Reviews

[Spamalot]

"Life is inhumane. It's a foolish game, and only the vain, and insensitive want to play it."

Seriously? You believe this crap? I ask, because, based on this line, alone, the ONLY logical next thing is to admit that you're vain and insensitive, too, or stop playing the "game" and die. Because if life is a game, the only way to stop playing it is to end the game. Why does that matter? Because if you build your argument on a false premise you've lost at the first line. Every conclusion you build on the idea if built on a lie. And that's based on YOUR premise.

" I think of how evolution took homosapiens, through a series of stages, before the state of intelligent life, and I can picture a tooth, stomach, or headache, hunger, or skeletal/muscular pain."

Forgetting that the sentence makes no sense, you present evolution as a if it's a guided force with a goal. So the second line crashes and burns. And you use the term "Intelligent life" as if early homo sapiens had none. But that's nonsense. So I do not think that term means what you think it means.

Did you give any of your arguments and conclusions a reasonability test in the real world? It seems not. The problem I find with philosophers, especially the self-proclaimed ones, is that they sit alone in a room, spinning what-ifs, and reaching grand conclusions that simply don't work in practice. Want proof? How many governments have a state philosopher who they go to for advice?

Seriously, drop the self-imposed anger with the rest of the world, and ditch the self righteous attitude that says you know more than those you look down on and get out in the world. Test your theories and conclusion against the real world. You might also want to study philosophy.

[J. Roman Vega]

My dear spamalot,
I came to the conclusion that life is vein based on the premise that reproduction is done at a codependent rate only to gratify ones need to cater to or be cartered to. In any ways having ambitions isnt helping society any, when all are taught that acceptable is a state of dog eat dog, and not a state of peace and law enforcement.

About intelligent life, I took a pathological look at the vicious cycle of evolution which is a chance survival of species through reproduction, and didn't state the obvious by saying it's a simile comparison of primitive, and historic pain, and suffering leaving the ones who pride in calling themselves intelligent to realize that no existence is a good existence, and reproduction only produces pain, and suffering unless proven otherwise.

I do believe my viewpoints are reasonable as I find that society insults my intellect on a daily basis, and I hope your not bitter about my suggestions on reaching a greater Utopia. Cheerio!