The biggest joke/invention in human history: Lawyers

Aka a******s who were able to sit through a test consisting of statutes which the common man would never be able to understand let alone interpret hence creating a cult of pretentious suit-wearers who don’t bat an eyelash at these obscurely written rules if it means they can still convince clients that they need someone to fight their useless battles only after forking over retainers so they can argue with another of their kind before a judge hoping they were better at interpreting bullshit

Contrast these fucktards with their real purpose:

Upholding justice

Who’s idea was it to delegate the delivery of justice to certain people as if the common man can’t advocate for his rights?

Let me tell you how I think this nightmare unfolded: the first early human thought he was too good for discomfort. He wanted a way to artificially manufacture life, liberty, and happiness as if these concepts can be deduced to formalities.

The law is born.

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but our lives end, we are rarely liberated, and by in large, unhappy. None of these things are wrong or unbearable. We were born to die, we can’t do whatever the f**k we want without consequence, and we are equipped with emotional hardwiring designed to make us feel crazy. So what does this create?

Entitlement: the idea that you should be immune to anything inconvenient.

In laymen’s terms, we’re narcissistic a******s.

And who is responsible for perpetuating this attitude? Aside from our own incompetence and inability to access self-awareness, I blame s****y lawyers. And Hitler.

For every noble lawyer who fights for justice, there is one who fights only for profit. Yet we look to them to serve our own selfish interests and they look to us to serve theirs.

We pay people to pervert the law.

Human beings are permanent paradoxes: we seek predictable patterns while simultaneously craving freedom and choice.

Ultimately, there is no such thing as predictability and there is no such thing as choice. We live chaotically and strangely. Yet we accept obscurely written rules of conduct. We’re primal and impulsive. Yet we think we’re civilized and prudent. We’re reactive and volatile. We think we should be regulated and mild-tempered.

The difference between how we should live and how we do live is the most important distinction to make. Who the f**k thought it was a good idea to tell humans what to do and how to think? It’s the perfect storm for defiance and irrationality. We don’t like to listen to rules and yet don’t like feeling out of control. We deluded ourselves into thinking rules maintain order and feelings aren't meant to be fully felt: we're prisoners of systems that obliterate justice and passion in favor of corruption and conformity.

The truly great and noble say f**k it to convention. They produce a contagious zeal, the kind that gives you stomach aches when an event or person violates the implicit human capacity to distinguish right from wrong.

So why do we trust lawyers? Because we can’t trust ourselves. We have this idea that someone else knows better. We don’t know how to fight for what we believe in and we don’t know how to feel.

We're cold and calculated followers with the underlying desire to change the world as we know it.

Who changes the world? Law breakers. Fearless individuals who aren't afraid to say "this f*****g sucks and everyone knows it so why don’t we change it?" People who believe they know a thing or two about ethical principles and human decency. People who actually do know better than the rest of us with the modesty to never boast about their capabilities and credentials because they often didn't have any to speak of.

If you believe in morality and complete understanding of the human condition, you're a delusional idealist.

(Welcome to the club.)