Healthcare Administration Study

About the quintessence of actions in ensuring the uninterrupted operation of health care institutions during the period of administration in a medical institution

dministration in healthcare setting is a quintessential act in ensuring smooth running of healthcare facilities. It requires proper decision making system and implementation of the functions of management to ensure that decisions relating to the service delivery are made fast. Unlike other organizations, administration of healthcare organizations must be conducted with the highest possible degree of efficiency because they have a direct impact on quality of services which translates to saving of lives. In other words, administrative activities undertaken by various personnel such as doctors, nurses and other medical practitioners are crucial in meeting the specific needs of customers either directly or indirectly. It is also important to note that the goal of administration in health facilities is to ensure coordinated efforts geared towards ensuring improved health outcomes for patients. Thus, it is important to analyze rationalize for specific research methodologies that are applicable in answering the research questions for the buy pre written articles in quality-essay.com

Research Problem and Research Questions

Breakdown in administrative activities affects quality of healthcare services. For instance, poor works structure can cause delay in treatment and making of decentralized decisions such as type of procedures to use and determination of payment plan for the health services accessible to the patient. Also, interdepartmental coordination is hindered whenever there is no clear administrative framework in the hospital. Undoubtedly, a failed leadership in healthcare is the onset of problems in service deliver. Hence, it is important to address this problem to identify ways through which healthcare facilities can establish the right administrative framework on which all other activities revolves around.

In regard, it is important to use qualitative research methodology to answer the following questions; what are the administrative duties of doctors that ensure the patients receive the needed care? What are the challenges barring patients from receiving timely quality care from healthcare facilities? What is the impact of healthcare administration on patient’s access to Medicare insurance required to handle diverse healthcare needs? How can doctors improve administrative framework in healthcare facilities? How are patients affected by administrative structure of a healthcare facility?

How fieldwork and observation can be used to answer the research questions

Fieldwork can be used to gain firsthand experience on different health facilities to obtain information from the right personnel about key issues that the research seeks to address such as the role of doctors in improving administrative frameworks and different administrative frameworks employed in various healthcare facilities. Notably, fieldwork provides the research on the field a more clear and realistic experience and perspective than any other 2nd hand pre-analyzed/digested account. It also gives the researchers the platform to establish network of scholars of same might to share important information concerning the same field site. Furthermore, taking a fieldwork enables researcher to examine policy and political processes while occurring to allow complementary perspective to diachronic or historical analyses. In this case, it will allow complementary ideas on patient’s access to Medicare insurance plan. On the same note, observation enables researchers to collect empirical data which are hard to obtain by employing other means. The information gathered through observation is more accurate than other means of data collection. This is because researchers can gather primary data directly from the target areas to ensure a more accurate delineation and interpretation. Besides, observation gives the researchers room to observe the subject for enough length of time which can promote greater validity and security in interpretation of and description. In addition, under observation, the subject of inquiry can easily be observed in their natural state thereby excluding artificiality in answering research questions. Therefore, credible and accurate answers to the research questions for this study can easily be obtained by observing the administrative activities and individuals involved in healthcare facilities.

How interviews can be used to answer the research questions

Interviews provide instant answers to research questions and when recording are obtained from multiple interviewees, researchers can analyze them for common themes and words that relate to the questions. Besides, the respondents can be asked to directly respond to the research questions. This makes information obtained through interviews more reliable and accurate than data collected through observation that is more reliant and vulnerable to bias from the researchers on the ground. Interview can also be used to ask follow-up questions to obtain clarity on various answers provided by the respondents. As a result, the researchers would have eliminated errors and inaccuracies in the data provided by the respondents. Importantly, researchers can select suitable candidates to view based on their credibility to provide the right information required. As such, the answers provided to the research questions will be valid, reliable and relevant also coupled by the fact that interviews enables interviewers to establish a short term relationship with interviewees that enhances trust. This trust is quintessential in receive clear and honest answers from the respondents without fear of information being used to cause harm to the respondents in any way.

Use of electronic interviews would be the most suitable. First, electronic interviews are convenient and time saving. As a result, researchers can collect data from as many respondents as they possibly can. On the other hand, meeting individuals face to face may take a long time especially in setting up a meeting place and carrying recording equipment. Electronic interviews also improves the ethical aspect of the research especially anonymity. Keeping the respondents anonymous gives them confidence to provide specific and accurate information without fear of reproach or suffering the consequences of airing his/her views. As a result, the study benefits by obtaining accurate information that promotes data integrity. Despite the fact that face to face interview enables researchers to observe non-verbal cues to gauge honesty of the respondents, electronic interviews can also be conducted via video calls that allow face to face communication. Under electronic chats, the researchers can also keenly monitor cues such as amount of time it takes to respond and deleting of sent messages to gauge level of honesty of a respondent.

Participants would be interviewed individually and not as a group. First, individual interview provides enough time to know each participant to the extent of building trust that is vital is fostering data integrity. Despite this being time consuming, the researchers can increase the amount of time available for data collection. Secondly, individual interviews create diverse pool of responses. Diversity is important in ensuring data accuracy and preventing imitation whenever respondents are interviewed as a group which makes some personalities to be more outspoken than others. Focusing on individuals enables respondents to answer questions freely and boldly regardless of their personality type. Thirdly, interviewing individuals gives room for adoption of different approaches to enhance creativity and maximize outcomes. In other words, researchers can adopt different approaches to asking questions depending on the personality type of the respondent, gender, communication skills and relationship to the subject in question. Therefore, interviewing individuals will enable researchers to overcome limits and setbacks posed by group interviews such as competition, control issues, conflicts between respondents from the same study area such as individuals working in the same office and lack of a creative approach during interviews.