GHOSTING GRIEFA Story by Carol CashesMaybe after the Holidays?GHOSTING
GRIEF Part 1 *The first two months after my mother’s
death and the burial of her and all my siblings I was numb, detached, possibly
shell shocked. The last two months I
have been “ghosting” grief" : by nurturing and devoting most of my time to a
renewed interest in music and the politics of our current society: gender, free speech, feminism, racism, etc.* I am appalled and horrified at the level of
ignorance and intolerance of today’s college students, and am only slightly
surprised at the willful ignorance of (too many!) adults. I remember college as an open forum where the
free exchange of ideas and theories and opinions was considered vital to
rounding out your academic education and the expectation was that you would discard
those abhorrent to your values and, after pursuing the FACTS regarding
information that intrigued or troubled you, form opinions based on logic and
reason. It was a time of smoky pubs,
cheap pitchers of beer and days-long debates about the pros and cons of
everything from the best pizza to the world economy or politics punctuated by varying
degrees of drug and sex experimentation; a time of embracing or abandoning
religious beliefs and of course, finding your true calling and adjusting majors
and minors to facilitate your goals. Hmmm…okay, I have onions...I
need eggs, milk…look! Shrimp’s on sale, perfect
gumbo size, too…Oh! Mama’s traditional
Christmas Eve gumbo…NO! Oxford University, you know, that centuries-old super
prestigious establishment located in England, adopted a ban on clapping. Clapping…as in forcefully smacking your palms
together quickly to show approval of a performance or a speaker’s words. The evil act of clapping has been replaced
with “jazz hands”: arms up and back and forth movement of the hands and
fingers. Why? Because there are approximately 3.5 (or less--I’m being generous) percent of the population who have noise-triggered anxiety
and it is apparently all of our job and responsibility to ensure that all
legal adults--not under another’s
guardianship, and who are considered competent to conduct their own affairs--feel safe…not the reasonable expectation of safety in public places, but the
new “safe”: not stressed… or upset…or triggered…or
expected to ensure their own survival and well-being in this big, cold world…*blink…blink*
Oxford…I’ll let that sink in…. Is that the Eagles? Desperado?
Leah loved that song…NO! I am reluctant to use labels that, in the past, I
would have used to ensure clarification of which side of an issue I was
referring to. However, I have noticed
that “liberal” and “conservative” are no longer terms used determine which
point of view/perspective/belief someone might be associated with, but beginning
a debate or discussion, (and by that I mean heated argument), by
addressing or labeling your “opponent” as one or the other is a blatant attempt
to bias the readers/listeners with pre-conceived opinions about that
person. All conservatives are not
Trump supporters and religious zealots and all liberals are not socialists and
abortionists. I have watched video
clip after video clip of grown-a*s people screeching at the top of their lungs
at anyone who dares to offer an opposing or even slightly different point of
view. When reason and facts are removed
from discussion and replaced with emotion (usually accompanied by spittle) and
misinformation or any factual information, you have created an
atmosphere of intolerance and hate. I
cannot understand how the irony escapes someone who claims to be championing an
oppressed faction of society or the “rights” of certain individuals can be
moved to red-faced name calling and even violence that far exceeds what they
declare the opposition to their cause is guilty of. Damn! I should have
cleared out this bookcase a long time ago…aww, look! Mama’s books on quilting…NO! Which brings me to the art of debate and it’s
disappearance in public forums. Debate
requires assertion of facts, countered by the opposition, point by point, with
other facts, and the “audience” can come their own conclusions. You know…weighing the veracity of each sides’
statements, deciding whose argument was more compelling and arriving at an
informed, logical and reasonable opinion.
That’s not what I’ve been seeing lately.
I see assertion of “facts”, maybe a valid rebuttal, but more often than
not, one side is going to go rogue…off point, loudly and dramatically. There is an assumption that the ignorant masses
also have short attention spans and that within thirty minutes we, the masses, will
be passionately supporting an ideal or cause that wasn’t even on the agenda! I
resent and am offended by these tactics employed by too many “experts”, politicians, and speakers and who
have too damn many letters after their names to justify use of such tactics to
win a debate. I immediately (and scornfully!)
dismiss their entire platform/cause because I can only assume that they cannot
validate their position and must rely on redirection and distraction…in other
words, they’re completely full of s**t. And that is my logical, reasonable and
informed opinion… © 2019 Carol CashesAuthor's Note
Reviews
|
Stats
212 Views
3 Reviews Added on November 13, 2019 Last Updated on November 13, 2019 AuthorCarol CashesBiloxi, MSAboutI'm very cynical, jaded, just this side of bitter and the only reason I haven't crossed that line is a good man loves me. I am extremely empathetic, but seldom sympathetic. I can be a ferociously lo.. more..Writing
|