The Global Hawk, A US Secret? (I would keep that secret! Who wants to show that as a weapon?)

See below...

The Global Hawk, A US Secret? (I would keep that secret!  Who wants to show that as a weapon?)

Probably does about MACH .75 at most.  A smooth move to try to lose the things hunting you.

Engine in the back and still thinking that one engine like the F-16 is better than being able to fly back to safety if your engine goes.  And, the intake is too small to be of use.  I note that twin engines get more thrust and...  Just the voom!  

I also note that even with that small engine the front by being raised may fall off.  That's a good view!

Cost, roughly 1.75 F-35s.  Must have expensive television habit by the AI.  And, showing smooth moves of no air superiority at 250 million an piece.

MY CIA group and I said, "Okay, but 25 million is a price we like and just a few that bad," almost certainly.

Who was that a*****e?

EDITOR'S LATER NOTE:

At least, it has a jet engine.  You doubtlessly do better at short takeoff and speed going with two, one under each wing.

Worse yet, we don't have a propeller in the back like the rest of the drones that we use regularly.  Who makes the blades fall off the propeller and also puts on too few of the blades?  I think that is the rule, but it may not be so!

If you need to say something about drones so far other than the CIA group and the Navy flying wing of 2025 done testing, I guess it would be "They are not the voom!"