Potential Emergency for Internet, c. 1995.... again c. 2000

See below...

I have a question that it might not be safe to ask.

When do you think that CIA magical supply will let the President into the supply rooms for the:

  1  Wireless listening device, finds a network and listens to the traffic on stray whatever rays

  2  The All-In-One listening device for cable modem, DSL, AT&T Uverse, and others that are still popular?

I mean, don't you just login your network through an internet connection that is not encrypted for all traffic and, perhaps, all of Langley (for example) could be on one allinone listening device that allows it all to be trapped and saved and analyzed?

Or, do I not get your -350 trillion dollar b***h-a*s experiment in security on The Web right?

I thought that competent software and hardware engineer might try something like that soon, or fly the missions that get you the training that allows the computer (or are they people) to finally let you into your own national secrets and devices?

An ah!  I will try a bailout by my country bid that is big of me for the Internet at-999 trillion dollars.

EDITOR'S LATER NOTE:

I suggest that an internet connection to the internet is a two-way or one-way access that does the thing.  Therefore, what you seek must be there.

I am not saying it is time to give up on these cheese dick expedition into the unknown, but you best hope that somebody makes some changes to the structure of the Internet soon!

EDITOR'S NOTE:

To a Russian who gave me a "I rock hits!  I am on the Internet!"  The thing that came to me was a "that is so, so, so, so stupid (of you to be on the Internet!)"

Yet it passed some people some time ago that we rely upon this for about everything from writing papers to finding shopping supplies over more secure than THAT internet connections no doubt!

EDITOR'S NOTE:

The teacher has a much better plan than that.  What about just using the servers (I am not a server person) to supply AT LEAST EMAIL that is local WEB and FILES SERVING all locally?  That would seem to be better security, right?  How much time do you think we have before they... call us "complete idiots?"

EMERGENCY NOTE LATER STILL:

I guess it would be okay and more safe to go back to dhcp instead of dynamic settings for a network, right?  And, you might be surprised at what gay magical voices might say about getting settings on the servers back in time because people might want to use them some day.  Let us pray.

Now, my best offer is about 1800-1900 USD negative, and you know the basis for that!

Still, people want to get the daily news and Facebook hot chix report, right?

EMERGENCY UPDATE LATER STILL:

It is apparently "the hope to save television" that is the reasoning back in time as to why such settings would be allowed.

Now, how this could save television, and Internet thing, is beyond my immediate grasp.  You have to cater to the morons that we hit with such spells, and that is so dear to work on, more television as if people will stop watching it...

EDITOR'S NOTE LATER ON:

So, I think that I had to tell my father who agreed, "I don't think I can support and protect your computer from search without magic."  Word!  So, you got to hope that... 

Whatcha wanna do with this mess?  You might suspect that given the theory of this quite some time ago and other matters, it was a lost cause and needed some people whow would work for government wages (free) and protect the people and some preliminary steps and some security along the way.  Word to that!

EDITOR'S LATER NOTE:

I guess that using PGP privacy that the US government has not broken from about 1996 to encrypt email is not that bad or BIN-HEX or UUencoding would do some.  Well we know that some is better than none.

EDITOR'S LATER NOTE:

I guess that the compatibility tests seem to indicate that a 386 program will run in Winblows 8, 8.1, so we could...

EDITOR'S LATER NOTE:

I guess somebody could get started on the (with some hm.. factor) a program that applies a "skin" approach to your #386 MS-DOS 5.0 program to make it show up on the screen better with simulated color blends and better resolution?  That might satisfy people some, but who worries so much about the look of this a*s-out Internet?

EDITOR'S LATER NOTE:

I guess the service could be localized instead of a "mystery meetup and hookup of computers on the Internet for their reasons" and the sheer force of the argument, "But, it works, most of the time!"  Most?

EDITOR'S NOTE:

I meant that static IP is better than DHCP (dynamic for me), right?  That was a thinko for a bit.  Of course, I can look in a book or on the Internet but that is not quick enough for real time writing, unfortunately, and I can't remember everything and anything...  Never could!

EDITOR'S NOTE:  

Here is a move called "Biting the Big One," getting the servers to say MUSIC: "There's nobody in here."  Really?  just a server on teh network.

That works in theory.

EDITOR'S NOTE:

The thing that came to me was "the huge, gaping vagina."  I guess that means claiming more comptuers than you have?  Who wants to win the gaping vagina and try to eat that s**t out?