An Essay: On BeautyA Story by Aidan SingletaryThere is a frequently used saying that goes: “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder”. It means that one can find something to be beautiful and another can find it to be ugly. This notion is one that is widely accepted in American society. This notion is one that raises questions in my mind. After some careful thought, I have realized my problem with it: I believe there to be an objective standard for beauty. I wish to find out more about why I think this. - People have preferences. Preferences are as old as Eve(probably older) and have been the cause of many clashes, from arguments to wars. They seem to be a constant in the ever-unfolding course of human history. With the rise in availability and affordability of many modern luxuries, preferences now hold more weight than they ever have. With the past dictates of necessity slowly dropping away, preferences increasingly dictate the way we live. Each day, we stray further from a cultural consensus on what is truly good i.e. the ideal direction for our lives. More and more, we look within ourselves to find that desired direction. This increasingly inward-looking posture ties in well with our use of the saying, “beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” This saying (as it is used today) is a vague, undefinable argument disguised as a deep, philosophical thought. It is sometimes used to defend or justify our life's current direction to others who may take issue with it. This saying is exactly what this inward-posture wants. - But I argue that the inward-posture is something that we should not want. If only for the simple fact that, in one's inward dictates of direction for one's life, he may be wrong. He may have chosen the wrong direction. He may feel the wrong way about something. But how would he know if he has not looked outside himself to test that direction? What if a man sees something beautiful and pursues it for himself? Could he be wrong in his pursuit? What if he gave up all notion of responsibility to society in order to pursue this beauty that society thought disgraceful? What if this man were a murderer who thought death to be the supreme good and a most beautiful task? Or even that he might prefer murder above all other vocations. Would we then say that “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder”? Or would we disagree and say that this man is wrong? A problem arises with this saying; the danger of viewing beauty as subjective. I am not trying to make a case for the cultural consensus being the supreme good. In fact, I believe that such consensus’ are largely wrong. I am only trying to point us out of this inward-posture of self-satisfaction and back to something greater. - Viewing beauty as subjective is in my opinion dangerous in yet another way. If one feels passionate about something beautiful, yet that passion is simply the result of his preference, then for what reason would he have the passion at all, especially if he can not convince others of its validity? Seeing beauty as solely subjective devalues the true passion of man; the great drive within him that has enabled the taming of nature and its wild beasts, that has given rise and kept the great civilizations still today, through great pain and suffering, enables the endurance of hardships in life and death for the sake of the ones that he loves. Man’s passion for beauty and truth denotes an objective standard for what is true, good, and beautiful. Standards of this kind are found all over the world taking the form of religious texts to self-help books. The only one I have found to be sufficient for explaining and healing the hardships of this world is the Bible; God’s Holy Word. - That objective standard is what we should return to discussing instead of, like some do, reverting to the shallow notion that “we all see beauty in different things.” This argument is agreeable to me in some ways. One is that we all see beauty in things. But what I take issue with is the way this notion is used. I have seen it used to shut down arguments on the subject of what is beautiful. I believe this to be a gross misuse of the notion. If we all see beauty in different things then shouldn’t we be arguing about it in order to expand and also sharpen our view of beauty? We all see beauty in different things because there is something beautiful to see in everything. There is something there that goes beyond what we understand now. Take music as an example. Haven’t we all been “moved” or “changed” by a song? Why would we literally act differently after hearing a song if it didn’t contain something deeper than we had understood before hearing it? - Beauty shows us a glimpse into what we were made for. It is not just our conception of beauty that does this. It is a constant search for beauty that not all strive for. A beauty that some have the wrong ideas about and that we will be wrong about as well. We must seek to conform ourselves to what is truly beautiful instead of settling for second-rate sayings that excuse us from the uncomfortable pursuit. Beauty is a place in which we fit. So let us search for this standard in all things and test all things against the testament of the scriptures and of the creation itself. When we find true beauty, let us rejoice in it.
© 2023 Aidan SingletaryReviews
|
Stats
66 Views
1 Review Added on July 4, 2023 Last Updated on December 3, 2023 Author
|