First, Rhyming couplets work best in short pieces. On an extended poem they tend to give a choppy feel.
Of more importance, you're forcing the line to the rhyme, and reader's don't react to that well.
From a reader's viewpoint:
The first line tells me that I feel a "sudden jolt." That could refer to either physical or mental, and the uncertainty is confusion, not mystery. And if I feel something I should know what it is. But of most importance, you newver say what it is, or relate it to the rest of the poem.
The second line clarifies, but only to an extent, so the reader is expecting you to clarify further. But you don't. You tell me that "the world in front of ME fades away. But since you haven't placed me in any world, nor created any situation—and since my world, clearly has not faded—I have no clue of what you mean.
And the fourth line mixes tenses, and talks about things for which the reader has no context. You know what's going on, but you have intent guiding you. And intent doesn't make it to the page.
And when you say, "Chip off like an old mansion's mosaic tiles" I can tell you from personal experience that mosaic tiles do not chip away by time, and When removing them you do not chip them away, and y more than you would bathroom tile. But you needed a rhyme for smiles, so you dripped in a non sequitur to make the rhyme, as you did the line that carries serenading, and more.
Ideally, the rhyme should seem almost accidental, and the words—which carry only the meaning they suggest to the reader, based on THEIR background—express the thought so perfectly that the reader is moved to say, "Damn, I wish I could say it as well."
Sorry my news isn't better, but you did ask, and I thought you would want to know.
God Sage! This is such a powerful piece of penmanship! The fall and further fall of a king! The poetic meter and content blend in seamlessly and the rhetoric is perfection. What I most like is that your write is not pretentious and despite talking about lofty ideals it does not resort to labored devices of Old English just to sound intelligent. Keep up the good work, and thanks for sharing this.
Hi there Sage. I've dropped by this poem 2 or 3 times. I'm inclined to agree with JayG about the sets of 4 lines rhyming (or nearly). However, I hesitate when I say that, because some kinds of chanting or rap would happily work with this style.
What I do like, however, with no equivocation, is the way the poem introduces, then discusses, then closes down. It's very well shaped, if you will. The summary ties everything off.
One spelling error - They feeling gets strong (should be 'The')
It's interesting the way the poem depicts the noble king as having somehow fallen, lost his principles, etc, all of which makes perfect sense. But if I wanted, I could probably argue that he survived rather than having his head chopped off or being killed in battle. I could argue that survival - live to fight another day - was actually the smarter thing to do. Just a thought to ponder :=)
Wow! Deep and a lot think about in this one Sage...You are truly gifted and I agree with Coyote 100 percent...thank you for the opportunity to challenge my motives and loyalties...GREAT write, valiant attempt at Rhyme...you have a way of getting to heart of men and challenging all of us not to turn a blind eye to world events .... because world events affect us all.........bless you dear....keep writing...
I enjoyed the poem. You gave strength to the ending with the story told in the words.
"It will be accounted for word to word
Because the pen is mightier than the sword
Your deeds will always be remembered
To remind people that their days are numbered"
The above lines. Left a lot for the reader to ponder. Thank you for sharing the excellent poetry.
Coyote
First, Rhyming couplets work best in short pieces. On an extended poem they tend to give a choppy feel.
Of more importance, you're forcing the line to the rhyme, and reader's don't react to that well.
From a reader's viewpoint:
The first line tells me that I feel a "sudden jolt." That could refer to either physical or mental, and the uncertainty is confusion, not mystery. And if I feel something I should know what it is. But of most importance, you newver say what it is, or relate it to the rest of the poem.
The second line clarifies, but only to an extent, so the reader is expecting you to clarify further. But you don't. You tell me that "the world in front of ME fades away. But since you haven't placed me in any world, nor created any situation—and since my world, clearly has not faded—I have no clue of what you mean.
And the fourth line mixes tenses, and talks about things for which the reader has no context. You know what's going on, but you have intent guiding you. And intent doesn't make it to the page.
And when you say, "Chip off like an old mansion's mosaic tiles" I can tell you from personal experience that mosaic tiles do not chip away by time, and When removing them you do not chip them away, and y more than you would bathroom tile. But you needed a rhyme for smiles, so you dripped in a non sequitur to make the rhyme, as you did the line that carries serenading, and more.
Ideally, the rhyme should seem almost accidental, and the words—which carry only the meaning they suggest to the reader, based on THEIR background—express the thought so perfectly that the reader is moved to say, "Damn, I wish I could say it as well."
Sorry my news isn't better, but you did ask, and I thought you would want to know.
I'm a college student, chose electronics, aspire for astronomy and love writing. Reading might be a nice feeling for people. Writing is probably the best thing mankind has stumbled upon.
I write bec.. more..