The grayest tear beneath the eye Lets loose, lets go and seems to fall Until it starts to fly. Little vagabond, most shy, Most dim, your look is sly And makes enormous motions sprawl Upon the sheet’s enormous caul, As lightning through a long and smokey hall.
II.
Svelte sculpture Amidst a pursy mob, Your image melts and then Congeals and melts, Congeals and melts again, With a swallowed throb, Like a guzzled gob Of gossip among ganders.
Your composite cells and ours Are of a selfsame origin, And all our pious bells and towers Are ringing in the swelling and the shaking of your skin. We, the fat, should be most thin Without your buoyant bursts of boiling flowers, Erupting, rattling, cracked into a grin, To wink at lesser powers.
Your belly trembles, Do you laugh or sob?
III.
You should not be strange and beautiful If you were not changeable and crass" A daughter of an angry miracle, Being cut from pocked and speckled glass. With each uprising gasp of raspy matter, Through clattering lips and eyelids, you present New starry fruit upon a celestial platter, Changing, warping, aging, but never spent.
In an angel-haunted world, that form is truth And sweetness which is sharp, rough, hard and spare; Nothing wears colors of patience, love and ruth Like a rainy statue in a rainy square. The limit of a performative portent Is as we shall ascribe, while time is lent.
Be wary of criticism on here until you've navigated your way around a bit. Critique is one thing; tearing down good work is another. There's a fine line between the two. Some people know the line, some do not. I have found that there are amateurs who pounce on good writers trying to prove that they know more than the writer (alas I have had the most trouble with English majors in college). I have found thatb the professionals at heart will leave something alone if they do not like it, or will gently offer definitive clear suggestions.
I am happily dazzled by a lot of the words and phrases here. This is my first reading and I'm a little wonder struck. So I will read again. Have to come back ^-^
Yeah, I'm not sure where to go with her. This was meant as a tribute to the style of Stevens, but id.. read moreYeah, I'm not sure where to go with her. This was meant as a tribute to the style of Stevens, but idk if it works 100%.
I have shared your work with a fellow writer with whom I think you will find confluence in style and thought. His pen name is Clockwork. You are both Classical stylists- a tough genre to both write and aprpeciate. I caution him sometimes about writing too abstractly for the audience to grasp the meaning of th work, and I would caution you the same. That said, this is wonderful. The imagery and descriptions are well-penned, an I can see the admiration for the unperfect, the angry miracle itself perhaps, shining through this. It is not often that we see poetry so focused on small detail any more, and that is a pity. We have lost the art of contemplation, it seems. Thanks for sharing- if for no other reason than bringing contemplation back to life again. High marks, my friend. You are off to a great start.
Well, I figured, when's the last time someone wrote an ode to the moon? Miranda's always been one o.. read moreWell, I figured, when's the last time someone wrote an ode to the moon? Miranda's always been one of my favorite celestial bodies, just because she is such a quirky mess.
12 Years Ago
Just as Diana was always one of my favorite goddesses. :-)
12 Years Ago
Btw, I suck. I overslept for Westkill. Idk if I want to get chores done tomorrow or do it tomorrow.
Be wary of criticism on here until you've navigated your way around a bit. Critique is one thing; tearing down good work is another. There's a fine line between the two. Some people know the line, some do not. I have found that there are amateurs who pounce on good writers trying to prove that they know more than the writer (alas I have had the most trouble with English majors in college). I have found thatb the professionals at heart will leave something alone if they do not like it, or will gently offer definitive clear suggestions.
The way you set up this poem is very intereting I've never seen it done outside of a textbook. good vocabulary as well but it kinda clashes I like ryme I just think it would have been less docter suesey if you had made the placement of the ryme different. As it is it seemes a little forced in my own opinion. I dont mean it badly the intent and structures all very good you just need to work on rythme and ryme a bit.
Posted 12 Years Ago
0 of 1 people found this review constructive.
12 Years Ago
Hmm, what do you mean different placement of the rhyme? To be specific, I was intending a syncopated.. read moreHmm, what do you mean different placement of the rhyme? To be specific, I was intending a syncopated feel for it, as if it was always threatening to break into a regular rhyme and meter, but not quite getting there.
12 Years Ago
if you differ the sentence lengths more and vary the placement of your ryming words that should add .. read moreif you differ the sentence lengths more and vary the placement of your ryming words that should add a more traditional ryme
12 Years Ago
Hmm...i'm still not quite seeing what you mean. Could you give an example? Sorry if I'm being thick.
er Im not rly sure how to describe it rly ... its honestly something that just happens, itll proball.. read moreer Im not rly sure how to describe it rly ... its honestly something that just happens, itll probally come with experience .
I want to apologize to any friends on here for how long I've been delinquent. I need to get back on here, clear my backlog of read requests and get writing again. Best wishes all. more..