An Essay on why we should study LiteratureA Story by R. M. Suarius-Heilig"Strangely enough humankind longs for progress, but insists on repeating the same mistakes and injustices of the past."An essay on why we should study literature. Attending the invariant need of a capitalised world, to
produce enough work force with the sole purpose of developing products which value
is mistakenly measured by its price; literature -not to mention the humanities
in its entirety- are often reckoned as fields doomed to failure. So much so
that the search for such courses are facing a significant decline over the last
years. However, it’s dangerously naïve to think of this trend as a mere demand of
globalisation when it’s actually a successful colonisation of thought. In the allegory of the cave, Plato intended to “compare the effect of education and the lack of it on our nature” using a series of metaphors to make a balance between ignorance and enlightenment. The cave represents the world and the prisoners its inhabitants. The shackles preventing them from freedom represents ignorance, for it deprives them of the truth. The shadows cast on the walls represents the illusions of the world and the freed prisoner represents the person who can now see the world from what it really is, therefore he can separate the truth from the illusions. Having said that, the deprivation of the masses from
literature or any other subject which purpose is to not only philosophically
enlighten the individual, but also train them to question their own reality;
serves the maintenance of a halter designed to keep those in power free from
the shackles of ignorance and in control of others, which in turn are conditioned
to sub-existence. It’s only natural that a system such as this deprives the
individual of such subjects; that is to say; deprives them of knowledge.
Looking back, the white upper-class men have always been fighting to maintain a
hierarchy of knowledge using a deranged justification called meritocracy. To
them, the merit lies on the nobility of caste rather than in the effort one
makes to be freed from the darkness of illiteracy. However, the theory that literature -or humanities- is
a dispensable subject falls into contradiction as the globalised market
requires a high degree of “critical thinking, communication and cultural
perspective, which cannot be taught by business schools, for it hasn’t the
expertise to teach philosophy, history and English” says Emad Mohammad, the
director of the Business and Humanities program of McMaster’s DeGroote School
of Business. A sign of this segregation can be seen on the vast curriculum on
the humanities field offered by renowned schools throughout the world that can
only be patronised by privileged “costumers”, whilst the rest dreams of an
unaffordable higher education. Moreover, literature plays a vital role to the
enlightenment of the shackled individual, thus, when used alongside other
disciplines of humanities, business, and the exact sciences enhance greatly
one’s sense of identity and place in the world. Naturally, any attempt to
subvert the long-stablished norm is viewed and labelled as unacceptable, for
the subject who thinks is an unruly one. © 2020 R. M. Suarius-HeiligAuthor's Note
Featured Review
Reviews
|
Stats
282 Views
2 Reviews Shelved in 1 Library
Added on May 6, 2018Last Updated on September 30, 2020 AuthorR. M. Suarius-HeiligAboutMy work focuses mainly on communication and literature. Using language and philosophy as paramount engines, I find in the dialogue between these two strands an artery for a direct intervention to the .. more..Writing
|