Bravo! I always like it when someone chooses to write in form - I think forms are drastically underappreciated. I did have someone tell me a few years ago that, in modern poetry, people tend to like to read forms where the poet was able to stick to the rhythm without reorganizing/detouring from conventional sentence structure - just some food for thought.
I like where your poem is going. Some of the images stir deep emotions, but others are still a little vague.
DaughterNature: You also mentioned: "I think forms are drastically underappreciated" My question is "by whom?" I guess only by those who are not real poets or decent critics of poetry. Many smiles and, please, keep in mind that when you express generalizing opinions, you should always provide solid evidence to support your, up to then, strictly and solely personal point of view.
Could you also please explain the literary meaning of the expression "drastically underappreciated". The "three" words do not combine well, you know. In (metrical) verse or in prose. :)
DaughterNature: I have just read the poem three more times to discover where it becomes "vague", as you have commented. I found nothing that would support such a characterization. It is a nicely written, impressionistic (metrical) verse that does not stir deep emotions, and does not become vague, either. As for the "food for thought" you have mentioned, I always cook my own, considering the fact I am among the best chefs in the world. Thank you. : )
Bravo! I always like it when someone chooses to write in form - I think forms are drastically underappreciated. I did have someone tell me a few years ago that, in modern poetry, people tend to like to read forms where the poet was able to stick to the rhythm without reorganizing/detouring from conventional sentence structure - just some food for thought.
I like where your poem is going. Some of the images stir deep emotions, but others are still a little vague.