4th line evokes Prufrock for me. Not sure if it's supposed to, but I like it for doing that. And I like the buried, embedded cadences being washed over by the high tide and smoothed out as we reach the end of the (dare I say it?) OVERWHELMING question.
Posted 11 Years Ago
1 of 1 people found this review constructive.
11 Years Ago
Great poem on many levels. I agree Eliot-like, the evocation of a history, of a past and a future wa.. read moreGreat poem on many levels. I agree Eliot-like, the evocation of a history, of a past and a future washed away by the tide of now.
4th line evokes Prufrock for me. Not sure if it's supposed to, but I like it for doing that. And I like the buried, embedded cadences being washed over by the high tide and smoothed out as we reach the end of the (dare I say it?) OVERWHELMING question.
Posted 11 Years Ago
1 of 1 people found this review constructive.
11 Years Ago
Great poem on many levels. I agree Eliot-like, the evocation of a history, of a past and a future wa.. read moreGreat poem on many levels. I agree Eliot-like, the evocation of a history, of a past and a future washed away by the tide of now.
I love this poem for so many reasons. It is all one sentence, one thought, and one question. But a question with many parts, all related, as in one passage or story. And the question is a real one and a good one, as it plumbs why there is poetry and the poets who create it. Science cannot answer everything. And that is where poetry takes over.