PhoneeA Chapter by Martin CarterSome unusual phone usesLike
the old phone in the opening chapter telephones with umbilical cords are fast
disappearing. (Witness the number of second hand ones available for little more
than a pound or so in charity shops and at car boot sales) Most people ourselves
included, who still have the traditional “land lines” as well as numerous
mobiles now have one of those “walk around the house phones”, those where the
handset and the main body of the contraption don’t have the twisted umbilical
cable joining them together and thus enable you to move out of the way when you
talk on the phone rather than obscuring Granddad’s view of the telly. These
handsets are “connected” to the base by radio signals, which vary in range but
usually work when the bit you talk into is up to about sixty metres from its
base unit.. For those who still think in good old imperial measurement, that’s
about sixty-six yards or equivalent to three rods, poles and perches, or
about five sixteenths of a furlong. These
are very versatile gadgets their mobile functionality being extremely useful
both inside and outside the house. I
find either when you need to escape to somewhere private to have your
conversation (which is why I have just invested in a hands free kit for the
“land line” which is now fitted to the handlebars of the lawnmower) or when the
call of nature becomes more pressing than the telephone call. After a bit of
practice one can quite happily continue the conversation whilst divesting
oneself one handed of ones trousers in the loo leaving the caller totally
oblivious of ones plight, position, choice of décor, loo roll colour or, most
importantly, angle of dangle. Probably the most useful feature of these phones
in this situation is the hands free facility. I
understand that we have entered the digital age and that anything “analogue”,
the old technology is now considered totally primitive. Now don’t ask me what
the difference is since technically I really couldn’t tell you. That digital
gadgets are more sensitive I concur since with my new digital hearing aid I can
detect the opening bars of soap opera
theme tunes that much earlier than with my old analogue one and thus
grab the TV remote, hit the “Mute” button or change channels that much more
quickly. Some
embarrassment I understand can be created when using the latest digital phones
since their increased sensitivity in comparison to the old analogue ones can
quite easily pick up the sound of flushing water, the incessant hammering on
the door of the next desperate would be incumbent or even that of a hastily
repositioned fly zip. I
have it on good authority although not from personal experience that such
sorties to the loo should not be practiced when using the new video type phones
for reasons, which may, or in the case of my reliable informant actually DID,
in his case, actually become obvious. Satellite
communications have of course begat the era of mobile phones. The first
communications satellite experiment was the USA SCORE (Satellite Communication
Orbiting Relay Equipment) launched in December 1958. In
orbit its greatest distance from the Earth was nine hundred and twenty six
miles. It received messages and recorded them on magnetic tape before
re-transmitting them. SCORE operated for thirteen days until its batteries ran
down. It was destroyed on re-entry to the earth’s atmosphere in January 1959. Incredible
numbers of communications satellites have been launched in the last few
decades, their size, weight and thus capacity being mirrored by the increasing
power and thus capability of their launch vehicles, examples being the Delta
rocket of the 1970’s, the Titan and the Ariane of the 1980’s to the now
familiar, albeit discontinued, space shuttle. 2002
saw the launch of the Astra 1K, weighing some five and a quarter metric tonnes,
six point six metres high with a span of thirty-seven metres, which, again, for
those of you that have never wished to embrace the metric measurement system
either, translates to nearly 22 feet and a little over 121 feet respectively. In
April 1972 a man, whilst walking along the pavements in New York City suddenly
stopped and took out a strange looking “brick” from his pocket. That man was
Martin Cooper of the Motorola Company. As he started talking into it, the age
of the mobile phone was born. Early
phones were not strictly “mobile” as we know them today but were
“transportable” being designed more for permanent installation in, for example,
cars. The growth and improvement of “cellular” technology during the 1990’s
with new base stations located relatively close to each other saw the
disappearance of phones about the size of house bricks and the age of tiny hand
held instruments come about. Setting
aside for a moment the argument surrounding both potential health issues which
mobile phone signals may or may not create depending on which side of this
particular fence you sit and the growth in number, size, shape and ever
increasing degree of physical intrusiveness of the associated masts, for which
this is neither the time nor the place to enter into that debate there is
little doubt that the mobile phone has to be one of the greatest inventions of
the last few years However,
such is now the degree of sophistication that our normal expectations of such
devices have and continue to climb to even dizzier heights. Twenty first
century homo sapiens is no longer satisfied if his communication device simply
enables one individual to talk to another. To be even considered by the
discerning individual as being remotely worthy of being part of his or her
essential paraphernalia it now has to have the ability to send and receive text
messages, connect to the internet, send and receive E mails, warn about speed
cameras, regurgitate a whole host of screen savers and ring tones and,
certainly in the case of phones for “Him”, have the complete functionality to
surreptitiously photograph for example and later admiration, scrutiny and
comparison in full glorious colour and mega pixels, without the telltale flash
and with zoom if necessary, the voluptuousness of the female sitting in the
next seat on a number 9 bus. There
are of course functions, which as I write mobile phones cannot perform,
including: - o
Reversing the call
charges automatically. o
Correctly predicting the
National Lottery numbers. o
Scratching that itchy
bit of your back whilst you’re driving whilst remaining in the “hands free”
position and thus remaining within the law. o
Making the tea. I
have it on equally good authority however (indeed the same good authority whose
advice on not using video phones in the loo is outlined above), that mobile
phones just might include these functions within the next year or two since
many hundreds of scientists are furtively experimenting away in top secret
research laboratories around the world seeking to provide solutions to these
functions amongst many others. Confidential
information has however reached me that research into a potential mobile phone
tea making function has recently been abandoned. Whist the technical issues of
making a small enough heating element to fit in the body of the phone and that
of getting not only the requisite water but also (optionally) milk and sugar
into the thing via a suitable orifice had, I understand, been overcome, early
experiments in attempting to boil the water actually flattened the battery in
an average of four point two nine seconds thus resulting in a total malfunction
of all the other functions and attributes more usually associated with mobile
phones…like, for example, making or receiving phone calls. Later
experiments centred on attempting the tea making function whist the phone
charger was actually attached and switched on. This had a somewhat better
(though not convincingly substantiated) result in that the water continued to
heat for one hour, thirty eight minutes and twenty odd seconds and reached an
estimated temperature of eighty two degrees… the lack of accurate centigrade
substantiation resulting from the fact that the liquid crystal display window
had misted up too much by that time to read the temperature figures properly. In
their final research report leaked prior its official publication to the press,
it appears that the research boffins have apparently finally conceded that even
if the water had reached the claimed eighty two degrees it would still be
rather tepid, would hardly brew a spoonful of Earl Grey, and, in any event, if
one was in a situation of being able to use mains electric power to be able to
run the phone charger, it would, irrespective of whether the phone was green or
not, probably be simpler, easier, quicker and certainly more thirst quenching
and environmentally friendly to put the kettle on instead. The
report also revealed that early research had dictated that actually putting the
tea bag into the phone had not caused a major problem since automatic cassette
loading of tea bags of a regular size, shape, weight and granular content had
been almost perfected, the problem of ejecting the wet soggy swollen remains
from the back of the battery compartment afterwards appeared insurmountable. Of
greater concern was the damage done by escaping tannic acid to the battery
terminal, which, the report described succinctly as, “terminal.” It
was not considered practical to include a cup. This was originally intended to
be overcome by using a hermetically sealed double wall glass lined case in
which the whole phone would be carried. The probability that this would
increase the bulk and the weight of the total resulting product making it
perhaps less attractive to the discerning buyer featured only slightly lower in
the project risk register than not actually being able to hear the damned thing
ring. Reaction
to the report has been mixed although significant concern was expressed by one
of the main network operators that the vast revenue potential for their “pay as
you brew” service would not be realised.
A spokesperson from another network operator indicated that plans for an
advertising campaign for the tea making service had been scrapped, less due to
the cancelled research than the fact that they couldn’t find a teetotal
suitably well known celebrity daft enough or greedy enough to star in it. Like
many inventions though the mobile has its down side. Constantly
we are hearing in the media about the Government or this or that educational
body’s concerns about falling standards of even basic reading and English. Is
that really surprising when parents stick a mobile in their kids hands and then
praise them to the hilt when they break the family record of 7.4 seconds when
texting……… L
O OW R U 2 Day Naturally,
such hi tech is expected to work at all times in all extremes of climate
ranging from the searing heat of the Gobi Desert, the Indian monsoons, the six
forty five train to Paddington, too, of course, the streamlined air conditioned
fresh vegetable aisle of the local superstore. Another
controversial issue, again not perhaps the subject for debate here is the use
of phones when driving. Talking on a
non hands free phone whilst driving creates what is considered to be perhaps
the most dangerous activity whilst in charge of a moving vehicle. In
recognition of this it has quite rightly become an offence and there are
punitive penalties for being caught with a phone in one hand and a steering
wheel in the other. To
be more specific the offence also….”prohibits the use of other hand held
devices that permit two way communication, speech, text or other forms of
data.” One presumes therefore that the use of semaphore flags is covered by
this same prohibition. Personally
however I don’t believe that talking on a mobile phone is THE most dangerous of
activities. My belief is that it ranks third. Drinking comes first. (For my
personal views on the second ranking, see the Global Positioning chapter). By
drinking too I don’t mean drinking as in alcohol consumption. I would never suggest
that drinking too much alcohol and then driving a vehicle is anything less than
a crime worthy in itself of the reintroduction of capital punishment. No,
I mean drinking as in consuming the contents of a can or bottle of any drink,
not necessarily alcoholic, whilst at the wheel. Let
me give you a for instance. Some while ago I was short of time and driving to a
meeting. My mobile phone was on the passenger seat of the car and began to
incessantly ring. I picked it up and answered it. Shouldn’t have done. I know
that. Completely illegal. Guilty as charged. However, I was driving an
automatic and therefore didn’t need my left hand to change gear with. My eyes
and concentration were firmly fixed on the road ahead. Suddenly there was a
squeal of brakes behind me closely followed by the squeal of tortured rubber.
Fortunately the then expected impact of his front bumper against my back one
didn’t happen The driver of the car behind had been trying to extract the last
dregs of liquid from a drinks can and had thus angled his neck so far back that
not only was his concentration not on the road but at that particular instant
his eyes must have been gazing up through his sunshine roof. Whichever
of those two scenarios you might consider the most dangerous in respect of
driving, without one single shadow of a doubt an environment which must be
considered to rank very highly on the list of abject dangers faced daily by
homo pedestrian, to which no other single human activity even comes close, is
people, particularly the male of the species, with a mobile phone in one hand
and a supermarket trolley handle in the other. I have the bruises to prove it. The
problem is exasperated by the fact that along the aisles even simple driving
rules like “keep to the left” don’t apply. It’s more like the fairground
dodgems. I
strongly advocate that mobile phones are banned in shops. Either that or
trolleys have to be fitted with rear view mirrors, or, much more importantly,
brake lights. I
applaud the landlord of a local village pub the door to which displays a sign
banning mobile phones from the premesis. The
trouble is that because communication is now so simple, and, by comparison with
the days of early telephony, so very cheap, much of the telephone traffic and
in particular text message traffic has sunk to the depths of total and abject
trivia. An
example…. Take
the case of one particular couple of my acquaintance who once and only once,
and with disastrous results, experimented with this new phone technology to
achieve the simplest, albeit one of the most tedious of domestic chores…food
shopping. They
live in a lovely country village in the middle of nowhere. There is no village
shop, the last one having long since succumbed to the pressures of the
supermarket. . She
doesn’t drive. He
does. The
village has a nominal rural bus service to the nearest town which is about
twenty miles away about once every two hours so it takes her several hours out
of a day if she runs out of some vital domestic commodity and has to go
shopping. He’s
gadget man. He
buys all the latest digital toys. He’s
the sort of man who, if someone ever invented a digital mousetrap would beat a
www dot path to the web site. She
by contrast has not the slightest interest in such things and even has trouble
turning the telly on. He
doesn’t know the supermarket layout. She
does. He
works in the town. She
doesn’t. He’s
appalled by the fact that she still used a pen and paper to compile her
shopping list so he’s tried to teach her to send it to him as a text message so
that he doesn’t have to drive home twenty odd miles to pick her up and then
drive all the way back to town again just because she’s managed to run out of
Brillo pads. She’s
reluctantly and none too successfully tried to learn. So,
on this particular Friday she compiled an electronic shopping list which she
has more by luck than experience succeeded in texting to him so that he can do
the shopping after work. Well that was the theory. Lists
or instructions, whether written down or in electronic form are, of course,
open to interpretation. Lists sent by text from an inexperienced texter can be
even more so. He’s
ended up that Friday evening standing in the superstore, empty trolley by his
side by the deli counter, phone in hand trying to read the text and he’s becoming
completely confused. This
was the result. First Call. “Hi Luv. It’s
me. Yes
I’ve got the list. I’m
trying to understand it. It
says “been”…with to e’s and no “s”. Do
you me beans…or do you mean you’ve been on the bus and got the beans already? What’s
that..? Oh a spelling mistake. OK.
You haven’t got the beans then? So,,,Do
you want baked beans, runner beans, or broad beans….fresh or frozen? Oh…kidney
beans….. For the chilli… Fresh
or frozen? Oh
…tinned. One
tin or two? One
large tin or two small ones..ok….or see if they’re on “buy one get one free” Right.
OK I’ll get some. The
rest of the list? Fine I think. I’ll call you back if I have a problem. Bye.ee.ee…..e.” Second Call “Hello
Luv. Me again. Yes
I know I said I could understand the rest of the list but this bit wasn’t
showing on the screen display when I called last time. It
says ‘ere “peppers”..Do you want ground peppers, black peppers or both? Oh,
neither…Green peppers and red peppers…for the chilli. What’s
that? Right. One of each except if they’ve
got yellow ones in which case get two. Is
that two yellow one’s instead of green
and red ones…or instead of? Instead
of. OK. The
rest of the list is ok I think but I’ll call you back if I have a problem. Ok
Luv Got that…By.ee.eee. Third Call “Me
again Luv. Yes
I know I said I understood the rest of the list. I do. I know what you want.
What I don’t know is where are they? Where
are what?….The peppers…. Where
am I now? In
the supermarket of course. Where
EXACTLY in the supermarket? Er…well let me see…I’m facing the front of
the shop with the fridges with milk and stuff in on my left, and the chiller
full of cream, yoghurt pots and these sweet things that you dip those finger
biscuits in to on my right. What’s
that? Slowly
luv…the reception in here’s none too good. ….Ok…..
I think I’ve got that but let me just run over that again. Turn
right…no..no.. left at the frozen veg, hard right by the cheese counter. What’s
that again? I
must charge this phone up its losing volume…. I
said, I must charge this phone up its losing volume… Did
you say…Get a French Camembert? It’s
not on the list. What’s
that? It’s not on the list cos you couldn’t spell it. Oh…Add
it to the list. OK. Then
it’s what…? Straight on past the cooked ham…. Yes…..… Do
what? Say again. The signal in here is none too good I
said the reception in here is none too good. If
they’ve got one of those small round cooked bacon joints grab one of those
while your passing? While
I’m passing what? Oh,
the counter with those small round cooked bacon joints on. It’s
not on the list. It’s
not on the list cos you’ve only just remembered it. OK.
I’ll add it on. It
should be the next shelf on the right, about waist height? What
should? Oh…the
place where the peppers are. The thing I asked in the first place. Hang
on love I can’t hear you they’re making some kind of announcement over the
loudspeakers. What
announcement? I
don’t know what announcement I didn’t hear it I was trying to listen to you. If
there’s a queue at the Delli, you reckon I should turn left and go round the
block by the mushrooms. Sorry
luv….. Say that again…. Someone
went by with a squeaky trolley. What’s
that? Did
you say go by the mushrooms as in walk past them or buy them as in get some? Get
some. They’re
not on the list. They’re
not on the list cos you’ve only just remembered them But
you want some…? Add
them to the list…OK. Open
cup ones or the little buttons? Either… Ok…What
for? Oh…..of
course….For the chilli…. Before
I go is there anything else you need added to the list? What’s
that? Did
you say bread love? Say
again. The signal in here is none too good.. I
said the reception in here is none too good. Hang
on love….Just a minute… I’ve
got to go now love. I’m sorry but I might not be able to get it all Why
not? Sorry
love did you say why not? Because
of that announcement. What
announcement? The one I said I didn’t hear properly earlier because I was
trying to listen to you. I’ve
got to get to the check out, cos the shop shuts in five minutes time…Its Friday
so they shut at ten o’clock…….” Total
human logic……? Zilch!. It
really does make you wonder if, to misquote the old cliché, was the end was
really justified by the beans? And……. Considering
the majority of major retailers, conscious of the fact that their customers do
on occasions become confused, disorientated and indeed sometimes totally lost
in the vast expanses of their ailed and freezer perimetered emporia, do
specifically employ umpteen keen happy smiling, staff to ease the trauma and
stress of shopping and guide their customers on an unencumbered path to the
awaiting checkout. There,
subject to giving the correct answer to two mandatory questions:- “Do
you need any help with your packing?”…. to which the customary answer is “No.”
(especially when all you’ve bought is your morning newspaper and a litre of
milk)..and… Have
you got a points card?”…to which the usual answer is “Yes … (and I expect my
loyalty to be recognised even though all I’ve bought is my morning newspaper
and a litre of milk even though it’s worth probably less than three loyalty
points).” Whilst
I do not suggest that these personnel are always easy to spot, I have it by
experience, duly now passed on that those with phrases not dissimilar to “I’m
here to help” or “Can I help you” emblazoned upon their store logod tee shirts
are as good a place as any to start. Realising that the dramatic increase in mobile phone traffic
between the customer and his or her home base has considerably reduced the role
of such personnel in fielding such traditional questions as “where might I find
these new green energy saving light bulbs?” or countering such complaints as
“Why is it every time I come in ‘ere to buy just one and only thing it seems to
be the one and only thing that’s got a “Sorry we’re temporarily out of stock
sign” on the shelf” … the more enlightened retailers have taken the opportunity
to re-deploy these staff having first trained them to achieve qualified status
in counselling such ailments as PCD
(Post Checkout Depression), and the ever increasing other stress related
shopping malady that all too often manifests itself as MTR (Manic Trolley
Rage). © 2016 Martin CarterAuthor's Note
|
Stats
94 Views
Added on December 28, 2016 Last Updated on December 28, 2016 Tags: phones, IT, communications, gadgets AuthorMartin CarterWorthing, WEst Sussex, United KingdomAboutRecently retired. 40 plus year career in the Procurement and Supplies profession I am writing a series of humorous short stories/sketches on the developments in IT in my lifetime. The first is backgr.. more..Writing
|