Your first paragraph is 981 words long. That's about four standard manuscript pages without a paragraph break. If the reader looks up and loses their place they're not going to find it again without more work that a reader is willing to put in. Aside from indicating a change in subject, paragraphs are invaluable as a means of helping the reader know where they are on the page.
But more than that, have your computer's Narrator program read this to you, to hear it as the reader does. Do that and you'll see the primary problem: This piece is meant to be performed, not read. Without the emotion you would place into that performance the reader has only punctuation, which means the reader will hear your words in a monotone, where for you, the narrator's voice—your voice, is filled with the proper emotion. Remember, when verbally telling a story, how you perform it matters as much, perhaps more, than what you say. And that entire performance, vocal as well as visual, vanishes on the page. Think of the places where you pause for a moment, to allow the listener to absorb and understand the significance of the words. For the reader that pause isn't there (especially because of the missing paragraph marks).
And as if that's not enough (sorry 😂), one of the most critical skills a writer needs is the ability to edit from the seat of a reader, who has no access to either context you don't provide, or your intent as to meaning.
You say, for example, "There born was Nur, to the gray she wolf (should probably be she-wolf) who warmed his cold body with the fur of her dead pups." But if she birthed him, that makes him one of her pups. And a mental picture of a she-wolf, abdomen bulging to the size of a pregnant human, legs not reaching the ground, seems a bit over the top—as does the child nestled among the rotting carcasses of dead wolf pups for a year or more.
That's certainly not the image you held, or intended the reader to get, but it is what the words tell the reader, who has no access to either your intent or the context you have that makes it meaningful.
My goal with this isn't to upset or discourage you. I did a critique because no one tells us that the writing skills we're given in school are nonfiction, which won't work for fiction. And that's a problem, because, but not knowing what, or why more is necessary, lots of writers turn to recording themself telling the story aloud to ad the emotion that the words, alone, don't seem to provide. But because such an approach works for the author, whose understanding is guided by intent, the reader's problem won't be noticed. And since we'll never address the problem we don't see as being one, I thought you would want to be made aware of it.
The solution? Simple: add the tricks of the fiction-writing profession to your current writing skill-set and there you are.
Obviously, though, simple and easy aren't interchangeable words, so there is the usual study and practice that goes with learning any new skill. But since writing is something you want to do, it won't be hard labor. In fact, it's more like going backstage at the theater. And once mastered, the act of writing becomes a lot more fun. So what's not to like?
There are lots of books in the fiction-writing section of the library, by pros in all parts of the publishing industry: teaching, publishing, and writing. So time spent with such a book in your hands is time wisely invested. Personally? I’d suggest Dwight Swain’s, Techniques of the Selling Writer, which recently came out of copyright protection. It's the best I've found, to date, at imparting and clarifying the "nuts-and-bolts" issues of creating a scene that will sing to the reader. The address of an archive site where you can read or download it free is just below. Copy/paste the address into the URL window of any Internet page and hit Return to get there.
You might also check some of the writing articles in my WordPress blog. They're meant to show the differences in approach between fiction and nonfiction writing, to give you a feel for where you need to focus.
So...I wish such news was easier to break, given how hard you've worked, and the amount of emotional involvement that goes into something like this. There might be, but I've not found it, and as I said, I thought you might want to know.
Jay Greenstein
https://jaygreenstein.wordpress.com/category/the-craft-of-writing/the-grumpy-old-writing-coach/
Posted 3 Years Ago
1 of 1 people found this review constructive.
3 Years Ago
Thank you Jay for your review! Honestly I posted on Writer's Cafe to get criticism so that I could s.. read moreThank you Jay for your review! Honestly I posted on Writer's Cafe to get criticism so that I could see better what I am missing in my writing. I downloaded the book you suggested and am looking forward to read it and learn more on how to write.
Your first paragraph is 981 words long. That's about four standard manuscript pages without a paragraph break. If the reader looks up and loses their place they're not going to find it again without more work that a reader is willing to put in. Aside from indicating a change in subject, paragraphs are invaluable as a means of helping the reader know where they are on the page.
But more than that, have your computer's Narrator program read this to you, to hear it as the reader does. Do that and you'll see the primary problem: This piece is meant to be performed, not read. Without the emotion you would place into that performance the reader has only punctuation, which means the reader will hear your words in a monotone, where for you, the narrator's voice—your voice, is filled with the proper emotion. Remember, when verbally telling a story, how you perform it matters as much, perhaps more, than what you say. And that entire performance, vocal as well as visual, vanishes on the page. Think of the places where you pause for a moment, to allow the listener to absorb and understand the significance of the words. For the reader that pause isn't there (especially because of the missing paragraph marks).
And as if that's not enough (sorry 😂), one of the most critical skills a writer needs is the ability to edit from the seat of a reader, who has no access to either context you don't provide, or your intent as to meaning.
You say, for example, "There born was Nur, to the gray she wolf (should probably be she-wolf) who warmed his cold body with the fur of her dead pups." But if she birthed him, that makes him one of her pups. And a mental picture of a she-wolf, abdomen bulging to the size of a pregnant human, legs not reaching the ground, seems a bit over the top—as does the child nestled among the rotting carcasses of dead wolf pups for a year or more.
That's certainly not the image you held, or intended the reader to get, but it is what the words tell the reader, who has no access to either your intent or the context you have that makes it meaningful.
My goal with this isn't to upset or discourage you. I did a critique because no one tells us that the writing skills we're given in school are nonfiction, which won't work for fiction. And that's a problem, because, but not knowing what, or why more is necessary, lots of writers turn to recording themself telling the story aloud to ad the emotion that the words, alone, don't seem to provide. But because such an approach works for the author, whose understanding is guided by intent, the reader's problem won't be noticed. And since we'll never address the problem we don't see as being one, I thought you would want to be made aware of it.
The solution? Simple: add the tricks of the fiction-writing profession to your current writing skill-set and there you are.
Obviously, though, simple and easy aren't interchangeable words, so there is the usual study and practice that goes with learning any new skill. But since writing is something you want to do, it won't be hard labor. In fact, it's more like going backstage at the theater. And once mastered, the act of writing becomes a lot more fun. So what's not to like?
There are lots of books in the fiction-writing section of the library, by pros in all parts of the publishing industry: teaching, publishing, and writing. So time spent with such a book in your hands is time wisely invested. Personally? I’d suggest Dwight Swain’s, Techniques of the Selling Writer, which recently came out of copyright protection. It's the best I've found, to date, at imparting and clarifying the "nuts-and-bolts" issues of creating a scene that will sing to the reader. The address of an archive site where you can read or download it free is just below. Copy/paste the address into the URL window of any Internet page and hit Return to get there.
You might also check some of the writing articles in my WordPress blog. They're meant to show the differences in approach between fiction and nonfiction writing, to give you a feel for where you need to focus.
So...I wish such news was easier to break, given how hard you've worked, and the amount of emotional involvement that goes into something like this. There might be, but I've not found it, and as I said, I thought you might want to know.
Jay Greenstein
https://jaygreenstein.wordpress.com/category/the-craft-of-writing/the-grumpy-old-writing-coach/
Posted 3 Years Ago
1 of 1 people found this review constructive.
3 Years Ago
Thank you Jay for your review! Honestly I posted on Writer's Cafe to get criticism so that I could s.. read moreThank you Jay for your review! Honestly I posted on Writer's Cafe to get criticism so that I could see better what I am missing in my writing. I downloaded the book you suggested and am looking forward to read it and learn more on how to write.