Infinite space of. Knowledge.

Nothing but knowing the deciphering eye.

Is there infinite amounts of space, knowledge, and time beyond the eye's cornea, versus the sums of Zion. If we spend every day looking to inculcate the slothful, distasteful, architecture of our surroundings and contrive to vivify what makes this world's innocence even better we'd be making an ameliorating era of time usage sagely. Needless to say that we are no longer a civilization that needs to cognize every increment of life as we know it. The very just of who we can see using our peripheral vision isn't the intended eye thought relinquished through what we are believed to see. Only an intellectual being may concur with the pronounced calling that the universe possesses. All of the predecessors of the mind are in obligation to have a many conversations with the dealt outsiders. Sometimes Commonsense is abstruse when conglomerated with intellects of 100-114 and subjacent. We may jazz up the known but the unascertained will only be unmasked through the prevailing winds of dauntlessness. This piece of writing isn't what the norm predominantly utilizes to categorize what you scrutinize with precise adumbration, through human perspectives. We may animate or breathe one's last breathe, we may discuss the justice of life's leisurely walk, or contend the latest issues of Obama's wrath, but indeed we need to condense the collective nature of our thoughts.

Author's Note

Distinctive thought, and distinguish thoughts.

Reviews

[Trigorin]

You've got what looks like an interesting piece, but once you really get down to it, what exactly are you trying to say? It seems at points that you've chosen words simply because they're big and impressive, and in other places you've made up your own words. Spellcheck, work on your grammar, and consider breaking this up into paragraphs. As it is, it's somewhat of a strain to read because it's a machine-gun spray of thoughts coming right at the reader and it's somewhat difficult to discern what you're actually saying.

[Legitimentality]

The entire point is to take the misunderstood, and the ridiculous elaborate words in this case, and to find your own meaning to what the somewhat large statement says. Read the quote at the top then reread. Knowing the deciphering eye, which means what you believe it to be; what you think it is or should be.

[Legitimentality]

Also my friend, it takes a creative mind to surpass the superficial. Who's to say that grammar should stay the same till our days are up. We are human we created the so called grammar with technological advances such as spell check as well.