The Metropolis and the Nemesis
A Chapter by Kuandio
I wandered the peripheries of the enormous city's central
sector, where massive sky-rises cut deep into the noon sky. The district I
navigated was nearer the outskirts; here most buildings existed in states of
squalid disrepair, spray-painted, windows shattered. Still, the myriad of
constructions made for a seemingly endless urban sprawl, punctuated by higher
structures here and there, blocking out most of the horizon. Constantly I
scanned the surroundings. Dangerous individuals had long been hunting me.
Though I'd had no runins or close calls for weeks, and there was no clear
indication they were closing in, I knew they were attempting to track me down
even now. I sensed it like a faint tremor beneath the surface of everything.
Hoping to throw off any potential hunters, I diverged
from the streets, pushing past a gate and roaming into a vast parking lot. Not
quite a parking lot, I soon discovered; something between that and a storage
zone for vehicles, and to some extent a junkyard. Most of the cars stationed
here were vans of a few different models. Surely, people would return for these
vehicles, and just as undoubtedly, others would leave more vehicles here,
temporarily, and permanently. No one else was to be seen in this area of immobile
transports, and the environs looked safe; nonetheless, a subtle fear persisted,
one that stalked me, akin to a distant shadow, and somehow reaching within me
as well.
Far in the distance, huge, bulky buildings, dozens and
dozens of stories high, loomed. That was where I needed to go. Somewhere beyond
existed the way out of the metropolis. Threading between the vehicles and
mechanical ruins, I advanced towards the structures.
I must have made it a third of the way through the
depository, when I descried, roughly a half mile ahead, a man with a dog. The
only souls thus far. My instincts told me to avoid them. Neither appeared to
have noticed me, occupied as they were with scrounging about the mechanical
detritus. Why their presence triggered fear, I cannot say, but it was
sufficient to be alert and ready for anything. Fortunately, not long after
spotting them, they became lost amidst the uneven maze of autos and scrap metal.
Surely they had gone their way, elsewhere, and so I advanced, freer than
before.
Later, when turning around a deserted bus, I was so lost
in musings of a better future, that I was caught off-guard and suddenly found
myself standing less than a dozen paces from the stranger and the dog. The man
was decades older than I, somewhere nearer a grandfather's age than a father's.
He lay on his back, arms behind his head, resting against the hood of a large,
dilapidated van. The dog was medium-sized, perhaps a german shepherd and golden
retriever mix, though its coat was reddish-brown coat, and its tail fluffy. It
eyed me neutrally. Then, to my slight shock, I noticed what I had overlooked:
One of the man's pant legs was cut off not far below the hip, revealing a
completely bionic leg, all black metal components engineered into a powerful
build, with a foot, less like a human's and more like a bird' large talons. The
old man casually smoked a joint, and greeted me cordially.
After initial salutations and introductions, we got along
surprisingly well, and I was quickly put at ease. Up close, I could see - more
importantly, I could sense - that these two were no threat. The old man gave
the air of a man who didn't have a care in the world, and this easy going vibe
helped me relax further. Even the dog was quite friendly. The old man explained
that whenever he went about to scavenge for mechanical scraps or units of value,
that the dog aided him, for he had trained it to sniff for an array of things,
as well as food, of course.
The van that he rested against was his own. Within, he revealed
to me that it was equipped with a variety of rudimentary as well as
technological conveniences which he maintained, including a number of defensive
measures, including weapons. There were also many curiosities in the way of
gadgets and what not, stacked and strewn. The old man informed me he survived
by collecting recyclable materials, and at other times salvaging machinery,
usually damaged or discarded, which he then repaired, reequipped, and sold.
Some parts he kept for himself. I also learned that he was a veteran of one of
the major wars several decades past. Being on the losing side, and having lost
his leg, he was shunned by society, discarded like these appliances and
vehicles, to entropy, or oblivion. Therefore, this was the life he was forced
to lead, to survive day to day, him and his dog. My first impression had been
true; the man had been on his own for a very long time. Regardless, he was
quite a positive individual, and this inspired me, to a certain extent. He even
expressed that he felt freer, and less stressed now that he lived on the
forgotten fringes of society than when he had once tried to partake of the
expectations of its endless, cycling, toil.
After revealing some of my plight, and that I was lost,
the old man agreed to help by showing me the way ahead. I nearly objected, but
I could see no reason to deny his aid. From the guts of the van, he un-racked
two plasma handguns, and a short-rifle. One gun he gave me, the other he
strapped under his jacket; the rifle he secured beside his beige backpack.
Forthwith, we set out. He wielded a mechanical staff, that had the look of a
covert weapon also. As we walked through the enormous depot, we talked now and
then. The old man and his dog provided pleasant company, and before long I felt
he was a friend I had known for much longer than the brief time I actually had
spent in his presence. Conversation and a steady advance helped the time pass.
An hour or two further on, we left the depot behind, and
came to another zone, this dominated by huge, industrial buildings on either
flank. Although I could not see it yet, I knew that where I wanted to go,
needed to go, was on the other side of this series of massive complexes.
Beyond, a network of roads and other forms of transportation awaited. This I
knew by the maps of the city I had studied. If only I could reach that unseen
zone, then I could find my way out of all this. Yes. Freedom was near.
Roaming deeper into the sector of hulking structures, we
came to a vast, sprawling marketplace. It was comprised of multiple levels,
roofed, and circulated by thousands and thousands of people. Well lit neon
signs advertised food, wares, and other services, some of these unprincipled.
Rivers and streams of humanity were transported up and down giant escalators,
as well as bridges, and moving causeways. The hum of their voices, of music, of
numberless things happening at once, was like a sustaining ocean.
The route we followed guided us through the very center.
On all sides I observed just about every manner of good, and other forms of
commerce, being bartered and bought, while music played in various stalls, and divers
merchants shouted in an attempt to fish for customers. The old man confirmed my
suspicions: We were in the metropolis' Black Market.
Amid the hubbub and churning masses, and knowing that my
future lay not far ahead - though I could not yet descry the roads and
transports - I suddenly felt a new peace, and expansiveness. Finally, I had
reached a higher stage in the journey of my life. Once I reached the transportation
zone, I would go far beyond this city that had long tried to devour me. I
breathed deep, contemplating the flowing progression of people along the
escalators and other reaches, here, there, up, down, one way across, then the
other, and on a movable staircase so colossal that I had never dared imagine
such a thing could exist. Little by little, I felt I was watching a vision of
humanity being recycled, over and over - a wheel turning, of fate, lives, and
more, of things I was not sure I even wanted to understand.
Plodding alongside me with his metal staff, the old man
imparted some wisdom, more or less saying that people think they see something
profound when they are at this stage of the journey, but that when you get
further, your vision will clear, and then you will understand better. The truth
was I did not fully understand these mysterious words, yet somehow they rang
deep and true, as if touching the contours of a place where truth converged
with revelation.
We neared the transport zone. Despite this area still
being obstructed from view, I knew my destination was close at hand, for signs
indicated the way, and there were individuals I noticed who were making their
way there. However, as we navigated the black market, an obscure intuition
awoke, stirring fear. My mind quickly pieced together clues that during the
past hours since arriving to the commerce zone, it had failed to recognize, and
had only been tangentially aware of ...
Someone, or maybe more than one person, had been tracking
us. Yes, I had spotted the same figure several times, through the crowds, far
behind us. Looking over my shoulder now, it was not long before I descried him
again, several hundred yards back. Surely, it was one of them.
The old man and I hurried through the presses. I tried to
be calm, and act discreet as I stole glances behind us, yet panic was quickly
building in me. To evade this unknown persecutor, the old man diverged into a
series of aisles where wares of less common make were being shown. Here were
far less people, which was at the same time reassuring as it was disquieting.
Had they sent one hunter against me, or several? My mind raced. There was no
security in this market, no law city enforcement, no one to turn to; yet even
if there had been, it would have likely been to no avail.
Despite my anxiety, time passed and we were untroubled;
the steady hum of market life went on, and I relaxed by degrees. It seemed we
had lost the killer. Perhaps there had never been one in the first place.
Besides, how would they know to look for me here, of all places? Since of late
I had so often been besieged by paranoia because of the dangers that stalked
me, my traumatized and overworked mind had been overreacting.
Calmer now, I browsed the items and considered purchasing
a few things for my travels, provisions, and even a gadget or two for leisure.
Envisioning the journey that awaited me, away from this city, perhaps from the
entire world, I was turning down an aisle when a tall, powerfully built figure
emerged at the other end of the aisle, and stood there, eclipsing my fate.
Suddenly frozen, I was forced to face it.
The android had passed unnoticed through the multitudes,
so perfectly crafted was its human appearance; resembling a middle-aged man,
with brownish-blonde hair and moustache. Over wide shoulders he wore a thick
coat, open. The rest of him was clad in drab hues, with gloves, and black military
boots. His stance was wary, arms akimbo, as if ready to draw a weapon. Cold,
unblinking eyes fixed on me with fierce precision. The old man was somewhere
else, a few aisles down, nowhere to be seen. I was alone against this nemesis.
Mere heartbeats after locating me the android charged. I
tried to draw the pistol but it fell from my panicked hands. No time to
retrieve it. The diabolic machine fought savagely to annihilate me, and I did
my best to avoid its crushing blows. Aisles were turned over, and the few
people in the vicinity scattered like birds from a pouncing cat. The world
turned in madness. Items clattered to the ground. I used anything to my avail
to smash against the attacker. Regardless of my best efforts, it could not be
defeated, only slowed. With heavy despair collapsing on me, I realized my
struggle would soon prove in vain.
The dog had found us and was barking wildly, providing
just enough of a distraction for me to leap out of the machine's destructive
path. I tried to flee one way, then the other, but the android swiftly cut off
any escape route. We faced each other anew. I cursed the artificial creation
and my life's broken hopes.
Movement in the periphery of my vision caused me to turn.
The old man had arrived, moving between me and the nemesis. Without stopping, the
old man flipped his metal staff horizontally, manipulating a lever and a
switch, then firing the staff like a long rifle at the android. From the base
of the staff exploded a powerful pulse of electric-blue energy. The blast sent
the machine reeling through stalls and aisles, until it lay amid ruins of
merchandise, its body crackling with the charge.
We both knew the android had only been temporarily
incapacitated; and sure as gravity, it had already given signal to the other
androids in the area as to our whereabouts. Therefore I the old man, followed
by the dog, turned on our heels and fled.
Once we had merged back into the flow of souls, and back
on course to my destination, we moved faster than before, no longer taking any
care to conceal our urgency. I could only pray we would lose the machine long
enough.
Further ahead, between towering buildings, I caught my
first glimpse of the destination I had long dreamt of, and was in awe. To
behold such a glorious vision, was like finally feeling the sweet caress of the
ocean for the first time. Multiple levels of freeways ascended, in lanes and tunnels,
with many vehicles and other transports zooming, lights aglow.
My heart continued to rise with the first real hope I had
known in years, perhaps even longer, indeed, perhaps my entire life.
If I could only reach the transports, I would get away,
and could find true freedom. A salvation that joined with the limitless skies.
© 2018 Kuandio
Reviews
|
• I wandered the peripheries of the enormous city's central sector , where massive sky-rises cut deep into the noon sky.
What hit me first, was that given that I have no idea of where we are in time and space, who I am, or what’s going on, this statement is meaningless. If I don’t know what city you mean, how can “the peripheries” bring any mental picture? You, of course, begin reading with the full knowledge of all that. So for you, this has context. In short: You can’t talk about what the reader has no context for till it’s introduced. A reader needs to know the three things I’ve mentioned (Who am I? Where am I? And, what’s going on?) as they read, to provide. context.
You talk about a “sky-rise” To a reader it could mean a tall building, an orbital elevator, or anything else. So for that reader, context is everything. Remember, your intent does not reach the page.
• The district I navigated was nearer the outskirts; here most buildings existed in states of squalid disrepair, spray-painted, windows shattered.
What you’re doing is transcribing yourself telling the story, and trying to give immediacy by substituting “I” for “he.” But that’s not first person viewpoint, as a publisher views that. And like any verbal storyteller you’re setting the scene before beginning the action—in effect, history instead of story. But would that work in film? No. The viewer expects to see the scene, not hear about it. In a film, in a glance, the viewer would know everything it takes thirty or more seconds to read about.
Can it work on the page? No for many reasons.
a) First is that you’re opening with a meaningless (to the reader) overview. The reader is told that “dangerous people” may be hunting our protagonist, whose age, occupation, etc, is unknown. Dangerous because they’re trying to serve a warrant? Trying to kill him/her? Dangerous because they’re insane? Bounty hunters? Radioactive? There could be hundreds of reasons, and as many definitions of what “dangerous means to him/her. But without even a hint of what world we’re on, or the smallest thing about the city, the statement they they are after him/her has no context for the reader. In fact, art the end of this we still don’t know the protagonist’s gender, and there has been not a word of dialog. So clearly, we are with the storyteller, not the one living the events, and hearing a synopsis of the events.
But story happens. And it happens in the moment the protagonist calls now, just like our lives do. And the moment you change to someone not on the scene, talking about it, you kill any feeling of realism, because it’s someone talking, not someone living. Our goal isn’t to make the reader know what happens, and what the protagonist felt. It’s to make them feel what the protagonist IS feeling. Think about yourself. If you’re reading a horror story. Do you want to know that the protagonist is frightened? Or do you want them to make YOU afraid to turn out the life?
b) Only you can hear your golden voice telling the story, because only you know how you expect to speak the words it as you perform. But the reader can’t know what a line will say, and after it’s read, it’s too late. And they don’t know your intended meaning. All they have is what the words suggest to them, based on their background. Have your computer read it aloud and you’ll hear that what the reader gets is far different from your performance. For them, all too often, it’s an emotion-free voice talking to them about things they have no context to understand.
Worse yet, the gestures you punctuate with, the expressions that illustrate emotion, and your body language are all missing, too.
And without your performance, what’s left but dry, emotionless words? In other words, you’re working hard, but using a tool-set inappropriate to the page.
Is it a matter of bad writing? Absolutely not. Talent? No again. It’s that because you, like all of us, leave your school days not knowing that we’re taught only how to write nonfiction, you’re trying to make use of the storytelling skills you own, and assume they’re what’s needed. And who’s to tell you you need more? Those who went through the same system, as it prepared us to hold a job?
See the problem? You’re working hard. You’ve shown the desire and the necessary perseverance. You have the story. But the simple fact is that if we want to write like a pro we need to know what the pro knows.
It’s not hard to find the information you need, once you learn that you need it. Nor is it expensive. It does take time to learn, integrate, and perfect those skills and tricks of the trade. But that’s true of any skill, so it’s no big deal.
Is this good news? Hell no. I was pretty upset when it was my turn to discover how much there was to learn, and that my “perfect story” was far from perfect. But it is something we all face, and after fixing the problem I sold my next novel, so the result is worth the effort.
Your local library system’s fiction writing section is filled with useful data, and well worth a visit. My personal suggestion is to seek the names, Dwight Swain, Jack Bickham, or Debra Dixon on the cover. You might also want to dig around in the articles in my blog, for a kind of overview of the issues.
But whatever you do, hang in there, and keep on writing.
Jay Greenstein
https://jaygreenstein.wordpress.com/category/the-craft-of-writing/
Posted 6 Years Ago
|
6 Years Ago
Thank you JayG, for taking the time to read this little piece. It is not very often I critique a cr.. read moreThank you JayG, for taking the time to read this little piece. It is not very often I critique a critique, but I thought I should mention a few things.
Maybe I should have put a disclaimer at the beginning letting readers know that this is not really a story, but a dream I had which I later wrote out. However, you can see this under the "book" titled "Dreams" that this chapter has been compiled to, and that the purpose of these writings is more for storage, to possibly flesh out later in life
So if you approach this piece knowing it is a dream, maybe you'd enter the first lines with a slightly different perspective; idk, but I would imagine this would be the case at least to some extent. Knowing that the identity is a, or the, "dreamer," then all three of the context issues you pointed out are addressed in the first paragraph
I've been hearing the term skyrise my entire life, and just take it to mean a tall building, never once an "orbital elevator" - but I could be wrong
The danger to the protagonist is unknown, because, when I dreamt this dream, it was unknown to me as well. Even if it was known, and this piece was an attempt at a short story, one could also argue that keeping the nature of the danger a mystery (at the beginning at least) would serve to entice a reader to want to know more, instead of doing the opposite - which you seem to be suggesting - and dropping absolutely everything into the reader's lap within the first paragraphs
Is it necessary to have dialogue?
The protagonist is just me dreaming, so there's no need to mention identity. Also, it could be whoever who is dreaming, as if providing an opportunity for the reader to enter that vehicle through which to experience the story
I really don't understand why it would ever matter what city or world we are in at this point. Telling those kinds of things to the reader would be obtrusive on part of the narrator. The protagonist already knows what city they are in. It is not something they would think of. Do you remind yourself you are on planet Earth when walking through town? Sure, I amidst sometimes I do that, lol, but at this stage in a piece of writing, telling the reader that would reek of exposition
I won't get into point b and everything that follows, since once again, this is a dream
All of your feedback is mostly valid if this were a story I were looking to publish. Of course, that which you provided, and that which anyone can provide in terms of advice, is only guidelines, never rules
I've been writing an average of three hours a day for the past 17 years (a few stints as a teenager and child as well). Most of what I have written is not good at all - I have most definitely come to realize that quite a few years ago. I've received many, many harsh critiques over the years, attended writers' groups, and read half a dozen plus books on craft, so I know where you are coming from when you delivered this critique.
Despite everything I said, I definitely appreciate your time and insight, and I will try to check out your blog
|
|
6 Years Ago
• Maybe I should have put a disclaimer at the beginning letting readers know that this is not real.. read more• Maybe I should have put a disclaimer at the beginning letting readers know that this is not really a story, but a dream I had which I later wrote out.
Who cares what the genesis is? You wrote this as a transcription of yourself talking—as if the reader can hear the emotion in your voice, see the expressions with which you illustrate emotion, and view the gestures you would visually punctuate with. And that can’t work, no matter your motive. On the page you can’t talk to the reader with the expectation that they get any of the emotion and feelings you do as the words make you recall the dream. Remember, your intent dribbles from the words at the keyboard, so for the reader, that’s gone. And that also means your intent for what a given word is to mean to the reader is gone, too.
The problem is that a given reader is probably from a different area, different age group, perhaps different cultural expectations. And, there’s a 50/50 chance their gender preceptions and biases differ. That matters a great deal because the reader has only what your words suggest to THEM, based on THEIR background, not yours. If you take that into account, and give them your perspective, as-the-dream-progresses, and in real-time, they won’t learn about it, they’ll experience it. As a side note, you’re trying way too hard to be literary. As an example, you say, “I diverged from the streets, pushing past a gate and roaming into a vast parking lot.” Eighteen words to say, “I ducked into a parking lot.” Does the reader care that there’s a gate? No. If you move to the lot is it necessary to say you’re no longer on the street? No. Does it matter if the lot is vast or not, given that your meaning for vast and the readers have no real basis for commonality? No. Does it matter what color the dog is? Things like that are visual details that matter in a film, but little to the story, so mentioning them serves only to slow the narrative.
• So if you approach this piece knowing it is a dream, maybe you'd enter the first lines with a slightly different perspective; idk, but I would imagine this would be the case at least to some extent.
No. It doesn’t work for the reasons I gave in the critique. Your goal in writing this is to inform the reader of the details. But you tell it as an overview, a synopsis presented without the context that would make the words meaningful. Telling someone they’re in a city, without placing that city in time and space renders the word “city” meaningless, because it has such a broad meaning over time. The fact that it’s a dream changes nothing because you DID NOT PROVIDE THE AMBIANCE of that city, as the one living the event perceives and reacts to it. In other words, you’re telling about the dream instead of making the reader experience it—showing.
People read to be entertained. So whatever you present it has to be entertaining. But is a report entertaining? Is a history-book type presentation entertaining? Given how many history books are sold for light reading I’d say no.
As I said, it’s not a matter of talent or potential, it’s that you’re trying to use the tricks of storytelling for another medium, in one that doesn’t support them. And like it or not; good intentions or not; hard work or not, it cannot work. And something to keep in mind is that I never simply view one piece of writing, when there are others available. My comments on the approach to writing this fit your other posted work, as well. In all of it, you, the storyteller, are talking TO the reader ABOUT the story, in a voice the reader cannot hear. I strongly urge you to have your computer read it aloud, to hear how different what the reader gets is from the way it sounds when you read it. Sol Stein addressed this problem with:
“Each Friday afternoon at three, while other students decamped for their homes, the lights were on in the Magpie tower high above the rectangle of the school. There Wilmer Stone met with Richard Avedon, then a poet, who became one of the most famous photographers in the world, the editor Emile Capouya, Jimmy Baldwin, myself, and a few others whose names hide behind the scrim of time. What went on in that tower was excruciatingly painful. Wilmer Stone read our stories to us in a monotone as if he were reading from the pages of a phone directory. What we learned with each stab of pain was that the words themselves and not the inflections supplied by the reader had to carry the emotion of the story.
Today I still hear the metronome of Wilmer Stone’s voice, and counsel my students to have their drafts read to them by the friend who has the least talent for acting and is capable of reading words as if they had no meaning.”
I respect the time and hard work you put into your fiction. And I know this is not what you wanted to hear, any more than I did when I found out why my six novels were all rejected. But if it helps, after reading Dwight Swain’s, Techniques of the Selling Writer, a book I recommend to all writers, my next submission sold. And given that I spent a good part of my time reading that book whacking my forehead and saying, “Why in the hell didn’t I see that for myself,” I think the time spent reading that and a few others was definitely not wasted.
As a sample, here’s an article that condenses one of the more famous of his techniques. Chew on it for a time, and I think you’ll end up wanting to know more. It has the power to make the story so real that if someone swings at your protagonist the reader will duck.
Hang in there, and keep on writing.
|
|
6 Years Ago
You make many valid points, but it is surprising you continue to treat this piece like a story inste.. read moreYou make many valid points, but it is surprising you continue to treat this piece like a story instead of mainly what it is: notes to myself that I might later use to develop something
To be honest, it is very difficult to understand some of what you're saying, especially in the first half of your response. I had to reread it several times and was still left in confusion because of the convoluted way many things were expressed. But I could tell there were valid points within it all
* "On the page you can’t talk to the reader with the expectation that they get any of the emotion and feelings you do as the words make you recall the dream."
- All I am doing is recoding the emotions and feelings as they came to me when awake, without filtering the language. There isn't more really to be shared, unless this was to be developed further
I agree, I try too hard to be literary. But "way too hard" - I definitely doubt that. This is also a highly subjective point you are making, in your all-or-nothing approach. Is "diverged" really that hard to understand? What age group are we writing for? It hasn’t been established. Also, there's the possibility that this is the way the pov character thinks, or would recount events
* "Does it matter if the lot is vast or not, given that your meaning for vast and the readers have no real basis for commonality?"
- I agree it could be done better here. At the same time readers can use their own visualization of "vast." Most people know roughly how big parking lots are, and understand they don't go on forever. I will trust the estimate their minds conjure. At the end of the day, the use of an adjective such as this can serve to jumpstart their own imaginations, instead of force-feeding them exact descriptions and information, which can also be obtrusive. The most important thing is that the dreamer is being followed and is trying to get somewhere
* "Does it matter what color the dog is?"
- this is getting ridiculous. Of course it doesn't matter to the plot, but it is a detail I remembered from the dream, and, if in a story format, such details provide texture, depth for the senses to be able to grip and feel the story. It can overdone of course, if I were to go on describing the dog for many sentences. But your observation absolutely does not apply here, since the dog is pretty much one of the three characters, and therefore some detail is called for. This a moment of contradiction in the points you are making. At times you want more ambiance, and then less detail such as this. Which is it?
* "Telling someone they’re in a city, without placing that city in time and space renders the word “city” meaningless, because it has such a broad meaning over time."
- Also coming out of left field. Within the first sentences you can figure out this is a modern city, and it is huge. Whatever the reader wants to imagine using this information, so be it. You could even start to get this dystopian future context from the title.
At this point showing and not telling doesn't matter much. And how can I (as the dreamer) know where in the universe I am while within the dream? Not being specific at this point adds to the surreal quality of the dream state. I feel like you are really trying too hard to prove your points.
* "But is a report entertaining? Is a history-book type presentation entertaining?"
- I would never recommend someone to write fiction in such a fashion, but the answer is yes, it can be entertaining, even more so than fiction. It all depends what is being told and how
* "I strongly urge you to have your computer read it aloud, to hear how different what the reader gets is from the way it sounds when you read it."
- Yes, thanks. I think anyone who is half serious at being a writer has done this early on in their endeavors
I'm glad you looked at the other stuff I've posted. I know it isn't as bad, regardless if you paint it all with the same grossly broad brush. I know it is not that wonderful either. Most of it was posted years ago, and it's been quite a while since I've had a chance to go over new drafts and rewrites with those wips
I might take a look at the author you recommended. But it's getting to a point of oversaturation.
I've heard your points, even though they are mostly obscure and broadly generalized in the way they are expressed. Nevertheless, I will honestly do my best to integrate the little I was able to glean from it all - and for that, you have my thanks. On the other side of the coin, you didn't pause even for a millisecond to consider the perspectives I offered you. There are shades of gray. It gives the sense you are too preoccupied with banging on your own drum to even notice what someone else says, and that, unfortunately, casts a degree of doubt on your ability to critique
I'm glad you published a few things, maybe even made some money. But when I encounter someone who can find no redeeming qualities in someone's writing - and I have encountered many to be sure - their opinions are devalued to a certain extent, because it gives you a sense of the mental lens they put on before they read.
What can I say? There are some published authors who've read what I've done and they like it much more than you do, and some who don't. Same deal with aspiring authors. Regardless of our little back and forth, I am totally open to always learn, and admit my shortcomings, and adapt. Then again, even when I have already done this according to the opinions of dozens and dozens of other writers, both aspiring and published, there is always going to be someone who perceives only shortcomings. Not to compare myself to successful published authors, but that would be the case with one's work even then
|
|
6 Years Ago
• All I am doing is recoding the emotions and feelings as they came to me when awake, without fil.. read more• All I am doing is recoding the emotions and feelings as they came to me when awake, without filtering the language. There isn't more really to be shared, unless this was to be developed further.
You miss the point. The technique you're using for this is identical to that you use in all your stories. You're telling, when you should be showing the action in the protagonist's viewpoint, which is a guaranteed first paragraph rejection with any publisher, or reader of self-published work. And I say that not as personal opinion. It's the professional judgment of someone who owned a manuscript critiquing service before i retired. It's not a matter of talent or potential, it's that you're using techniques of verbal storytelling in a medium that can't reproduce your performance.
Clearly, you can write in any way you care to. But if your hope is to someday gain a publishing contract, you must take the time to learn what publishers, and readers expect, and react well to.
And since it is not my objective to make you unhappy, or argue, I'll bow out of the thread.
|
|
6 Years Ago
Lol. I wasn’t upset except for brief moments, and nothing like back in the day. Everyone except fo.. read moreLol. I wasn’t upset except for brief moments, and nothing like back in the day. Everyone except for true angels are going to have some ego. More than anything though, I found this exchange hilarious and have been trying not to laugh out loud while at the coffe shop by myself.
|
|
|
|
Stats
213 Views
1 Review
Added on January 28, 2018
Last Updated on January 28, 2018
Author
KuandioCA
About
I started drawing comics when I was about four or five (not much better than dinosaur stick figures). Over time I found I couldn’t express enough through just drawing and was always adding more.. more..
Writing
|