Are Books the Best Source of Information Out There?A Story by Jana OmarThis is me trying to explain that there are a variety of different sources of information, and that anyone has the potential to learn.Are Books The Best Source Of Information Out There? "Are you a nerd?
Yep. Do you read a lot of books? Nope. I'm not that of a bookworm. I
guess you're not a nerd, then." I do have this conversation quite often.
Why do people think that nerds read so much books? I mean: most nerds do
read a lot of books, but not all nerds do. Am I against reading? Not at
all. But I look at books from a different perspective. Are books useful? More
useful than you think. Like: how long does it take a writer to write a book? A
year? Two? Three? It takes A LOT of time. Now, think about this: you read a
book about politics. It took the writer two
years to do research and write the book. It took you a month to read that book.
Now, you just consumed the acquaintance the writer developed during two years.
Even though the book was about politics, I bet the book had some vocabulary
you read for the first time, and you (hopefully) must've learned some new
words. But, on the other hand, the book could've been biased. The writer may've
quoted some sayings, followed by his own thoughts to persuade the readers that
his point of view is veracious. Or, they may've written information that
you weren't willing to know, or focused less on (in your opinion) more
important information, that you need the most. Some books even include a lot of
excessive description, which makes finding the main ideas harder, and makes the
book long, and uninteresting. And I personally think that books may not be
practical for due-date research papers; the writer may not include all the
information you need, all in the same book, which would make you read several
books, and I think it's tiring and unpractical. A way that is, in my
opinion, more practical for gaining knowledge or finding information is the
internet. The internet provides short, summarized articles that could be more
practical for research papers. And, another thing that extremely increased my
general knowledge was that, I used to think of weird questions, and run to my
laptop and "Google" my question. I easily find the answers online,
and read short articles that had accurate answers without too much explanation,
which I do not like. When I find myself interested in a specific topic, I do my
own research and read the specific pieces of information I want to know.
Plus, the internet inspires me to discover new questions, and do more research
(and become nerdier). But, the internet isn't always the best source of
trustworthy information. Like: anyone could create a website and write
false information or rumors. And, unfortunately, if you "Google"
really weird questions like I do, then, I guess you probably
won't find an answer. In general, I think the internet is more specific, and
slightly more practical than books, but not as trustworthy.
After all, books may be
richer in information than the internet. But, the internet is
more specific and summarized than books, which I prefer, but at the end,
whatever you think is suitable for you, just read it. © 2018 Jana OmarAuthor's Note
Reviews
|
Stats
232 Views
1 Review Added on September 6, 2017 Last Updated on May 31, 2018 Author
|