Start Here

At the heart of everything

Overview http://www.writerscafe.org/Jack%202.0/blogs/Overview/19425/

 

NOT FOR ACEDEMIC USE [non-peer theory]
 

According to popular theory and a host of evidence...

Everything is made from this set of subatomic particles:

            q           l                      Spin      Mass              Charge

Neutrino         v                      ½         < 1 eV                 0

Down  d          (v|e)                ½        1/3 proton         -1/3

Up       u          (e|v)                ½         1/3 proton       +1/3

Electron          e                      ½         > 0.5 MeV          -1

q = quarks , l = leptons, collectively called Fermions  

Spin http://www.writerscafe.org/writing/Jack-2.0/928722/

 

Mass http://www.writerscafe.org/writing/Jack-2.0/928869/

 

Charge http://www.writerscafe.org/writing/Jack-2.0/928887/

 

 

 

                               O & T Theory

 

O = Oriented at the origin

(Right = z to x to y to z... Left = z to y to x...)

 

T = Terminated at the teminal

 

Simplified with O&T, where O --> T = 80 eV:

 

                    Oxyz               mass=

 

Electron        OTTT             T cubed

Up                OTVT             T squared x V

Down            OVTV             T  x V squared

Neutrino       OVVV             V cubed

 

Antimatter:

 

L is an inverted T (because there is no inverted T on the keyboard)

 

                    O ------------ T     Tx  is on the blue pole

 

  L ------------ O                    Lx is "anti" on the yellow pole

 

  L ------------ O ------------ T     Vx  is on the yellow/blue pole

 

A is an inverted V

 

  T ------------ O ------------ L     Ax  is on the blue/yellow pole

 

                zxyOxyz       

 

Positron    LLLO

 

Photon =   LLLO  +  OTTT  =   OTTT + LLLO

                [ T and L cancel: still there but hidden]

                                   O~O

                             

Photon        O~O

Gluon          OcO   (c indicates "color")

Weakon       OwO  

 

Reorientation:

 

                   Ox_y_z      

 

Neutrino       OV V V    superimposed  on another OV V V

                   point O (origin) of the second neutrino

                   fits between two axes of the first neutrino

               

Mu neu         OVOV V  (second neutrino reorients at X and Y)

 

Mu neu         OV  VOV (or it can reorient at Y and Z)

(ortho)

                   The mu-neu can be reoriented to yeild...

 

Tau neu        OVOVOV

 

                   If the the tau-neu is reoriented, it will

                    no longer be a Fermion (lepton or quark)...

                    rather it becomes a Boson...

 

W+/-             OVOVOVO 

  (note that it begins and ends with O, like the photon O~O)

 

 

END OF THIS SECTION *********************************************************

 

unpaired fermion = 1/2 of the pair, times sum of numbers of O and T symbols all over number of axes (3)

Mass = T(mass) raised to number of T, times V(mass) raised to the number of V

 

[G] as 6.6917625e-11 = (10)^(-10.1744595)

it has been postulated that the

numerical value of the gravitational constant is exactly the same as the

numerical value of the product of the magnetic constant and the square

of the fine structure constant , which has different units. Because of this

and other seemingly coincidental numerical exactitudes that occur only for

this value of [G] , it is thus postulated that the system of units in use is

 in need of reconsideration.

 

 

 

 

(c) 2009 O&T Theory / BB Jack Presents

Author's Note

Technical Reviews Only

Reviews

[Muse]

Aaaaa...English please?

[Jack 2.0]

Thanx Muse :D

Remember that Jules Verne wrote about an atomic submarine 100 years before any such thing was realized -- lucky guess? Maybe, but in any case he used snippets of science for his fiction novels. Ahhh... so this material here is the kind of stuff that gets put into English in the form of science fiction. The math you see here will be sending ships to the stars 100 years from now -- and readers will wonder if this was just a lucky guess -- hmmmm -- or maybe I'm a time traveler ;) -- or....

[Muse]

HG Wells The Shape of Things to Come. :)

[Mockingbird]

this looks like it should be on the blackboard of an advanced physics class at harvard. i do believe there is poetry in numbers even if another doesn't understand why.