NEWS STORY OF INTEREST

NEWS STORY OF INTEREST

A Story by June D Johnson
"

Northgate MarketFiles Lawsuit Seeking to Block Workforce Multifamily Housing Developmentin The City of Riverside in the Midst of a Housing Crisis

"


Recent legal action filed by family-owned Hispanic supermarket Northgate Market seeks to prevent development of multifamily workforce housing in the City of Riversidedespite the City of Riverside’s and State of California’sdesperateneed for more housing


The Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, will hear an appeal from a lower court’s ruling enjoining a 450-apartment unit project known as Magnolia Flats, located adjacent to Northgate Market in Riverside, California.  Northgate Market filed a lawsuit seeking to prevent the housing from being built because it would (allegedly) interfere with its delivery trucks which currently drive through an easement-protected drive aisle between Northgate and the housing site sought to be developed.  The Magnolia Flats developer has stated thatthe project has accommodated Northgate’s desire to drive their delivery trucks across the Magnolia Flats development site with multiple ingress and egress options.


Magnolia Partnership LLC (“Magnolia”) is the owner of 16 acres of mixed-use zoned property at 10481 Magnolia Avenue, Riverside, California (the “Magnolia Property”). Magnolia purchased the Magnolia Property toconstruct an attractive mixed-use commercial development consisting of desperately needed workforce multifamily housing (450 apartments) and 9,000 square feet of retail space (the “Magnolia Project”). Magnolia’s goal in developing the Magnolia Project is to provide much-neededworkforce housing for hundreds of middle- and lower-incomefamilies in the Riverside community. This new multifamily housing development would also greatly help the City of Riverside achieve compliance with the State of California’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (“RHNA”) requirements. The City of Riverside is required to provide a minimum of 18,415 new housing units for the 2021-2029 Housing Element Cycle. An added benefit of the Magnolia Project would be additional customers frequenting the businesses surrounding the Magnolia Property, businesses which include the proposed Northgate Market grocery store. However, Northgate seeks to block the development of the Magnolia Project because of purported easement andaccess concerns.


Magnolia went through an arduous two-year process designing and entitling the Magnolia Project which culminated with the Magnolia Project recently being approved by the City of Riverside. The City’s approval incorporated review of noise and drive aisle design considerations, which are governed by State of California CEQA and City of Riverside code.  At the time the Magnolia Project was approved, it was the largest multifamily housing community recently approved by the City of Riverside. Unfortunately, on September 14, 2021, Northgate Gonzalez, LLC (“Northgate Market”) blocked the development of the MagnoliaProject byfiling a lawsuit against Magnolia and Realm Real Estate, LLC (“Realm”) (Northgate Gonzalez, LLC v. Realm Real Estate, LLC; Magnolia Partnership, LLC, Case No. CVRI2104149). The Complaint filed by Northgate Market also named Wilson Holdings, L.P. (“Wilson”), a real estate entity owned by Scott Bell of ICI Development Company, Inc., and Los Altos XXVII, L.P. (“Los Altos”), a real estate entity owned by Northgate Gonzalez RE, LLC, of whom Oscar Gonzalez, Co-President, Chief Operating Officer, and Owner at Northgate Marketand Carl Middleton are members,as plaintiffs. According to the Complaint, Wilson and Los Altos own the property where the Northgate Market is located (the “Northgate Property”).


In its Complaint, Northgate Market alleges a technicality that development of the Magnolia Project violates a 1979 easement agreement between the Northgate Market and Magnolia Project properties.Northgate Market alleges that the land must be used for shopping center and commercial purposes.  Previously, a Toys-R-Us was operated on the Northgate Property and a GEMCO was located on the Magnolia Property (both Toys-R-Us and GEMCO closed their stores leaving the vacant site a blighted and underutilized eyesore).


Concurrently with the filing of its Complaint, Northgate Market also applied for and was granted a preliminary injunction enjoining (blocking or prohibiting) the Magnolia Project, the largest multifamily housing community recently approved in the City of Riverside. Thus, pending the outcome of the ongoing litigation, development of the Magnolia Project is on hold.  In the interim, Magnolia and Realm have appealed the preliminary injunction on the basis the easement agreement's purpose is for ingress, egress and parking, and contains no use restrictions, maintaining the mixed-use commercial multifamily Magnolia Project is definitionally in compliance with the commercial language of the easement agreement.  Northgate Market has not yet responded to Magnolia’s appellant brief. Additionally, Magnolia has filed a Cross-Complaint against Northgate Market.


Shockingly, in their Cross-Complaint, Magnolia alleges that prior to the lawsuit being filed by Northgate Market, representatives of Northgate Market, Wilson, and Los Altos made demands for substantial money from Magnolia. The Cross-Complaint alleges, “On or about January 29, 2019, representatives of Plaintiffs and Cross-Complainant [Magnolia] met in Newport Beach to discuss Cross-Complainants’ project. Plaintiffs’ representative Scott Bell opened the meeting by stating ‘This is going to cost iStar a lot of money!’” According to the Cross-Complaint, at the time Mr. Bell made these comments, iStar was the owner of the Magnolia Property. Tellingly, it appears that based on the timeline of events as described in the Cross-Complaint, the monetary demand made to Magnolia precedes the filing of Northgate Market’s Complaint to enjoin, or block, development of the Magnolia Project. This begs the question, was the lawsuit filed simply to use obstruction of the approved Project to “exact” a substantial monetary payment?


Darrin Olson, a representative for Magnolia, says “Northgate Market’s decision to file suit to oppose the City approved development of 450 housing units is unfortunate given that housing is desperately needed in the State of California and the City of Riverside.From the inception of the Magnolia Project and through today, the development team has taken great efforts in designing the mixed-use commercial and multifamily development to be harmonious with the easement and integrated with its neighbors such as Northgate Market, while going above and beyond in designing the Magnolia Project in a manner that addresses and alleviates those concerns voiced by Northgate Market, including delivery truck circulation.”  Mr. Olson further states: “Words cannot describe how disappointed we are in Northgate Market’s opposition to a muchneeded 450-unit multifamily workforce housing development project.These same residents of our proposed apartment development are likely customers of Northgate Market. Magnolia just wants to improve our community by providingdesperately needed workforce housing in the area.”


Mr. Olson continues, “The City of Riverside describes its vision of Riverside as ‘the place where the American Dream is realized. A place where regardless of income level, people are able to find distinctive, special places to live.’ TheMagnolia Projectis designed with the goal of providingsuchhousing in order for the City to realize that vision and furnish that dream. Sadly, Northgate Market does not share the same dream or vision and is hell-bent on stopping the development of more workforce housing.”


Notably, the developer behind Magnolia Flats hassuccessfully developed other architecturally appealing multifamily projects in the Inland Empire that provide significant housing enhancements to communities.  For example, “Mission Lofts” is an attractive 212-unit apartment community located in Riverside’s Eastside, a Hispanic neighborhood, whereby a blighted, Metrolink adjacent, commercial site was redeveloped into workforce housing. Additionally, “Monterey Station” is a 349-unit apartment community that was developed by the owners of Magnolia and completed in downtown Pomona.  Similar to the Magnolia Flats and Mission Lofts developments, theMonterey Station project site was a blighted commercial area near downtown Pomona and next to the Metrolink station, before being developed into new workforce housing for hundreds of families. 


Similar to Mission Lofts and Monterey Station, the owners of Magnolia are seeking to enhance and provide the much needed 450-unit workforce multifamily housing in Riverside on a blighted site.

 

About Magnolia Partnership and Its Investors:  They have completed over $20.7B in multifamily value-added transactions since 1996, including 350 multifamily community acquisitions and 90,000 units as well as numerous developments. 

© 2022 June D Johnson


My Review

Would you like to review this Story?
Login | Register




Reviews

What kind of idiot spams for a company by talking about a lawsuit that the company is involved in?

As always, the company has been notified, via the Dun & Bradstreet contact form, here:
https://www.dandb.com/businessdirectory/magnoliabuildinginvestorslp-riverside-ca-4742270.html

So this moron will hear about it.
https://www.dandb.com/businessdirectory/magnoliabuildinginvestorslp-riverside-ca-4742270.html
*********************
Please, pass this on to management

Someone, who is a monumentally bad writer, is spamming the Writers Cafe website, in your name, posting it in the area reserved for the stories and poems that writers want comments and suggestions on. This is unethical, inconsiderate, and pretty stupid on their part, because the the quality of the writing was notably awful. And a writers site is a particularly stupid place to spam for investors.

So...they’re annoying the members, making the site less fun to use, while accomplishing nothing useful for you. Yet you’re paying to have it done, through your internet provider, SEO company, or advertising agency.

Add to that, that the writer has not a clue of how to present an advertisement for investors. That matters, especially on a writers' site, because annoyed members will post negative reviews of your company if it continues.

So won’t you please tell them to stop?
You can view the poor quality of that spam here: https://www.writerscafe.org/writing/JDJohnson/2822439/

Posted 2 Years Ago



Share This
Email
Facebook
Twitter
Request Read Request
Add to Library My Library
Subscribe Subscribe


Stats

43 Views
1 Review
Added on July 11, 2022
Last Updated on July 11, 2022
Tags: Housing