Nasal Packing Devices Market: Industry Analysis and Outlook, 2030

The global nasal packing devices market size was valued at USD 173.2 million in 2021 and is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.1% from 2022 to 2030.

The global Nasal Packing Devices Market size is expected to reach USD 271.0 million by 2030, based on a new report by Grand View Research, Inc. The market is expected to expand at a CAGR of 5.1% from 2022 to 2030. This is attributed to the increasing prevalence of epistaxis and the ever-growing geriatric population. The demand for nasal packing devices is constantly on the rise, as epistaxis, also known as a nosebleed, is a commonly occurring condition. However, it is not severe in every case, and therefore people used to pay minute attention to it. But since the population has become increasingly health-conscious, many people opt to get it treated before the condition worsens.

The use of nasal packing devices increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The spread of the virus was a constant threat to healthcare professionals and patients during the pandemic. Hence, patients that suffered from epistaxis could be discharged from hospitals by applying nasal packing which, with little training, could be replaced and removed at home itself. This relieved the pressure on the hospital and minimized Epistaxis patient visits. Epistaxis, if left untreated, is a constantly occurring condition and can cause high discomfort and pain to the patient. In severe cases, it may also lead to fatality. Therefore, medical professionals first try to eliminate epistaxis through electric cauterization.

In case of failure of cauterization, nasal packing is used on the site of bleeding in the nasal cavity to create pressure and control the bleeding. In epistaxis conditions, a nasal packing can prove beneficial by achieving hemostasis, preventing desiccation, protecting the site from trauma, applying constant pressure to the mucosal walls, and protecting the nasal cavity. Nasal packing is highly used to control nasal bleeding as its advantages far outweigh the disadvantages. Post-packing care is taken by doctors to ensure patient safety. Manufacturers are also constantly investing in research and development of new products that can overcome these complications. In December 2020, Medtronic launched Novapak Nasal Sinus Packing and Stent, a single-use, dissolvable packing, intended post sinus surgery. It proved highly effective in bleeding control, prevention of adhesions, and providing a moist healing atmosphere for quick patient recovery.

Related Press Release@ Nasal Packing Devices Market Report

Nasal Packing Devices Market Report Highlights

• Based on type, the spray segment held a majority of the market share in terms of revenue in 2021 as they are extremely convenient to apply and eliminate the pain which is usually caused upon insertion and removal of traditional packing
• On the other hand, the gel segment is likely to witness the fastest growth rate during the forecast period due to its features such as high hemostatic properties
• Based on material, the non-absorbable segment dominated the market in terms of revenue share in 2021 pertaining to its cheaper price, better benefits, and increasing consumer preference
• The bio-resorbable segment is likely to grow at the fastest rate in the coming years due to the new technological developments and the introduction of new and advanced products into the market
• In 2021, North America dominated the market in terms of revenue share due to the growing adoption of nasal packing devices in the healthcare sector and the increasing number of epistaxis patients. In addition, a rise in COVID-19 cases in the region contributed to the market growth
• Asia Pacific is anticipated to witness a significant growth rate over the forecast period owing to the increase in the number of nasal packing manufacturers, high unmet needs, and improving healthcare infrastructure  

Reviews

[Spamalott]

So for fun, I added another review of these crooks. This one on Quora.

For more than a year, this company has regularly invaded the Writers Café website, one of the oldest, non-commercial writing venues on the internet. And they do that in spite of repeated requests to stop. Does an ethical company do that? No.

Ignoring site rules and the desires of the members, they drop spam for their company, falsely listing that spam as a chapter in a pretend book. Does an ethical company lie that way? No. Does a successful company have to resort to such tactics when advertising on the site is available at reasonable cost? Absolutely not.

In fact, the author of the spam is so inept that he can’t handle the HTML formatting that people experienced in presentation on the internet take for granted.

He lacks skill in working with the HTML language used on the Internet, so all the indentations he included were lost—both of sections under a heading, and paragraphing within that section. And he either never noticed, or didn’t take the time to learn how to fix the problem. Either way…

Aside from being dishonest, and inept, posting spam in the area reserved for the stories and poetry of members is a violation of site rules, disrespectful of the members, and, demonstrates that to them, a potential coin in the pocket is more important than ethics.

They’re supposed to be enhancing their reputation and attracting customers with that spam. Instead, they demonstrate a lack of writing skills, because the supposed condensations of the actual report are written in a way that bores the reader in a paragraph or two. That’s dumb because their entire sales pitch is based on how well they write.

In short, while the company expects people to see them as being experts in their field, they cannot handle a page of promotion for what they sell. You can see the inept formatting of today’s spam here:

https://www.writerscafe.org/writing/Industryinsights/2829563/

[Spamalot]

Ahh, the lowest of the low Indian data w****s is spamming for their poorly written crap on a site where no one ever buys one. So add stupid to poor writing.