I just read your post in the general forum after I posted my own. It looks like were here for the same thing: real constructive criticism. I'd like to take a look at this poem and would appreciate it if you reviewed the one that I've posted.
I like the pacing here. You've got a nice iambic flow that helps to develop tension, keeping the pace quick. It certainly helps to build the fear I think you're going for, at least as a topical meaning.
I was distracted by the 'poetical' contractions, 'gainst, 'twas, 'twixt. If it is a theme that you are shooting for, I see it, but don't really like it. These types of contractions seem hokey and gimmicky. Generally, anything like that that takes my attention away from the poem usually lessens its affect.
I like the dual meaning. I can't stand when dual meanings are beaten into you by an author. Yours, here, is subtle enough to respect your reader.
Thanks for the review, Enroc. I'll be sure to review something of yours soon.
I'm replying here so I can make it clear that there was some reason behind the little contractions. The entire aim for this poem was that double meaning, but it was also a fusion of two styles. 1. A fast-paced, jumpy rhyming tale with a bit of a lighthearted storybook/fairytale thrown in. Something both airy, yet dark. That's where the slightly silly terms like "'twixt" came in. And 2. A deeper, more emotional poem stemming off of dark personal emotions and experiences.
Something I strive to do in most of my poetry is create a contrast between dark and light, love and hate, ugliness and beauty. I'm sorry that didn't come across to you here, but thank you for the criticism.
I just read your post in the general forum after I posted my own. It looks like were here for the same thing: real constructive criticism. I'd like to take a look at this poem and would appreciate it if you reviewed the one that I've posted.
I like the pacing here. You've got a nice iambic flow that helps to develop tension, keeping the pace quick. It certainly helps to build the fear I think you're going for, at least as a topical meaning.
I was distracted by the 'poetical' contractions, 'gainst, 'twas, 'twixt. If it is a theme that you are shooting for, I see it, but don't really like it. These types of contractions seem hokey and gimmicky. Generally, anything like that that takes my attention away from the poem usually lessens its affect.
I like the dual meaning. I can't stand when dual meanings are beaten into you by an author. Yours, here, is subtle enough to respect your reader.
I'm 20 years old and I'm a writing student living in Hawaii. Writing is my passion, and I'm striving to break into the market doing something I really love. more..