On Being Happily SadA Story by Hamza MasaeedDespite the ambiguity and malleability of the forms that
happiness can take, there seems to be a conclusive and confident consensus
around the importance, merit, and essentiality of it. Since the dawn of time,
religions have claimed the presence of an innate sinfulness in human beings;
thus, religions preached, we must abide by religious codifications in order to
achieve eternal and genuine happiness in the afterlife-- happiness was not
paramount and persistently emphasized. Nevertheless-- after emergence of the renaissance and the
exclusion of religion with its tenets from public and political life-- the
concept and the achievement of happiness have become reiterated in the works of
many of the enlightenment’s leaders, philosophers, and poets. “Oh happiness!
our being’s end and aim,” passionately declared the 18th-century poet Alexander
Pope. “It was the best thing one could do to be always cheerful and not suffer
any sullenness,” echoed John Byrom. Further, “life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness, “is often cited as the chief cornerstone of the American dream. In
short, the strong emphasis on the universality and the usefulness of happiness
is not only new, but perpetually and desperately pursued by most people
nowadays. Arthur Schopenhauer This restless--and seemingly desperate-- pursuit of happiness
has searing repercussions and paradoxical consequences. Logically speaking,
happiness is plainly devoid of sadness. If one is happy, one can’t be sad. For
succinctness, a happy person does not invariably suffer. Consequently, there
are many endeavors-- which are most definitely worth pursuing-- that won’t be
achieved or even pursued if one’s mere and highest prioritized goal is to be
happy. Galileo, the father of modern physics, blinded himself after a life full
of tireless commitment and devotion to discovering the mysteries and
intricacies of the universe. Moreover, constant high risk of dying from
chemical explosions did not dissuade Sir Humphrey Davy from pursuing his
passion. History generously offers us many paragons of creative
innovators and thinkers who were willing to suffer and endure immense pain for
initiating and sustaining an endeavor. One could be well acquainted with the
fact that a relationship is stocked with misunderstanding, disappointment, and
anger, yet-- with a faith in a higher value-- he or she would not leave or
refuse to participate in a relationship due to its inevitable display of
suffering and pain. “Those who do great things suffer greatly. Those who do
small things suffer trivially,” Nietzsche put it succinctly. His mustache was
not the only point of bewilderment; Nietzsche's seemingly unwarranted
pronouncements still preoccupy philosophers. “To those human beings who are of
any concern to me I wish suffering, desolation, sickness, ill-treatment,
indignities. I wish them the only thing that can prove today whether one is
worth anything or not--that one endures,” uttered the staunch believer in
hardship and its importance in molding our lives. Further, sacrificing creativity and honorable contribution
for humanity is not the only downside of the pursuit of happiness, the pleasure
of paradox, is also a seriously appreciable consequence to consider. Seeking
happiness directly, some psychologists and philosophers warned, will diminish
the pleasure we attain in the long-run, and even in the short-run. We should,
according to the pleasure of paradox, devote our attention and energy more
towards things we find inherently meaningful and creative, and thereafter, as a
by-product, happiness may be the prize. “Ask yourself whether you are happy,
and you cease to be so,” observed the fervent advocate for happiness, John
Stuart Mill. Thus, “why be happy when you can
be interesting,” as Slavoj Zizek asked wryly. © 2019 Hamza MasaeedReviews
|
Stats
120 Views
1 Review Added on March 5, 2019 Last Updated on March 5, 2019 Author
|