A Blind Man in a Room Full of Deaf PeopleA Chapter by DesertBeachGuyThe Bush Administration: Term 1 -- Bush planned Iraq invasion before 9/11A Blind Man in a Room Full of Deaf People Inside The Bush Administration: Term 1 Bush planned Iraq invasion before 9/11 Sources: CNN News, CBS News 60 Minutes, The Price of Loyalty : George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neill by Ron Suskind The Bush administration began planning to use U.S. troops to invade Iraq within days after the former Texas governor entered the White House seven years ago, former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill told CBS News' 60 Minutes. "From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go," O'Neill told CBS, according to excerpts released by the network. "For me, the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do, is a really huge leap." O'Neill, who served nearly two years in Bush's Cabinet, was asked to resign by the White House in December 2002 over differences he had with The President's tax cuts. O'Neill was the main source for the book "The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neill," by former Wall Street Journal reporter Ron Suskind. Suskind said O'Neill and other White House insiders gave him documents showing that in early 2001 the administration was already considering the use of force to oust Saddam, as well as planning for the aftermath. Suskind cited a Pentagon document titled "Foreign Suitors For Iraqi Oilfield Contracts," which, he said, outlines areas of oil exploration. "It talks about contractors around the world from ... 30, 40 countries and which ones have what intentions on oil in Iraq." In the book, O'Neill is quoted as saying he was surprised that no one in a National Security Council meeting asked why Iraq should be invaded. "It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The President saying 'Go find me a way to do this,'" O'Neill said. One-on-one meetings were no different, O'Neill told the network. Describing his first such meeting with Bush, O'Neill said, "I went in with a long list of things to talk about and, I thought, to engage [him] on. ... I was surprised it turned out me talking and The President just listening. It was mostly a monologue." The Bush Administration’s Response to O’Neill’s statements: "It appears that the world according to Mr. O'Neill is more about trying to justify his own opinion than looking at the reality of the results we are achieving on behalf of the American people. The President will continue to be forward-looking, focusing on building upon the results we are achieving to strengthen the economy and making the world a safer and better place." Do you feel safer now than you did in 2001? The country deserves to know -- and the president needs to answer -- why the American people were presented with misleading or manufactured intelligence as to why going to war with Iraq was necessary. Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts also issued a statement: "These are very serious charges. It would mean [Bush administration officials] were dead-set on going to war alone since almost the day they took office and deliberately lied to the American people, Congress, and the world," Kerry said. "It would mean that for purely ideological reasons they planned on putting American troops in a shooting gallery, occupying an Arab country almost alone. The White House needs to answer these charges truthfully because they threaten to shatter [its] already damaged credibility as never before.”
© 2008 DesertBeachGuy |
Stats
216 Views
Added on April 3, 2008 Last Updated on April 3, 2008 AuthorDesertBeachGuyExeter, CAAboutI have been working with people in a business environment since I was a teenager and delivered newspapers. I worked my way through college working as a customer service manager. After graduating fr.. more..Writing
|