Start culling humans instead; they're far too many of them, and of the wrong type!

Self-explanatory.

By Stanley Collymore
 
Big game hunting equals sick
people, and it's essentially
humans who are really
the beasts, not the elephants, who
are exceedingly intelligent beings.
And what a distinctly, undeniably
truly asinine suggestion; to really
promote that instead of focusing
on simply catching the poachers
and then handing out very harsh
court sentences and undeniably
evidently burdensome, financial
penalties similarly both to them
and their killer backers; to deter  
and also lawfully force them to  
stop we toxically have purblind
pernicious and unconscionable
pillocks like Sue Reid, a literally
fatuously, braindead Daily Mail
hack upholding trophy hunting.
 
That's like suggesting that you
should effectively, actually
leave the doors of your
private residence unlocked at all
times, so that essentially every  
perspective burglar, wanting  
to generally, make a call at
your home will effectively  
cause less destruction to
your individual property
as, and when, they opt
to generally break in.  
 
Or just as idiotically suggesting
that we might all as well either
agree to or stupidly acquiesce
in the heinously, vile slaughter
of elephants by humans, truly  
for fun because basically, the
alternative is poachers killing
them anyway, for profit. What
a ridiculous and odiously sick
suggestion evilly put forward,
as a supposedly very sensibly
sound, and ethical argument!
 
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
16 June 2023.
 
 
Author's Remarks:  
How about instead, actually hunting vile columnists at rags like the Daily Mail and its like-minded media who quite evilly and supportively for sick avariciously financial gain, perniciously and rather malevolently egregiously occasion much more damage societally? A distinctly better and far more conscionably undertaken enterprise is very currently rather difficult in these evidently odiously and very tiresome circumstances to essentially contemplate.
 
And rather frankly, there is no shortage of machetes in London to effect such a task! Generally we do, after all, rather earnestly wish for a much better world don't we, and how much better to undeniably, effectively and realistically attain this vital endeavour, than by literally weeding out our trash!  
 
Elephants are quite well known, by those who genuinely care, to be highly intelligent beings with an irrefutable capacity, which they constantly use, to naturally socialize in their own respective communities just as humans do in ours; and therefore, are thoroughly capable, and something that they customarily do, of effecting this when they unfortunately lose one of their own either through natural causes or barbaric circumstances at the hands of predatory so-called human beings, and consequently have a natural instinct for revenge, I prefer to call it justice, just as humans invariably do when crass and barbarous ill-treatment, or worst still malevolent death, is callously meted out to just one or actually several of their own. So why do we mourn the death of Sarah Everard or those that were quite recently and also most callously killed in Nottingham if we're then going to equally and callously likewise deprive elephants, and wilfully so, most wantonly and rather arrogantly of their lives in the same brutal and egregious fashion?
 
Elephants have an inalienable right to live on this Earth too, and human beings are no more entitled to land, on our essentially borrowed planet Earth than elephants and other creatures, who we share this Earth with! And the arrogance of the human race to think otherwise is quite mind-bogglingly astounding. Bearing in mind also, that we have humans breeding like cancer, while there are those among our own race who want to push these intelligent animals to extinction; just as the UK has already done with over 400 species, actually within the last two centuries.
 
So please, stop trying to put a positive spin on what is effectively a most barbaric and rather abhorrent activity. And to claim that elephants occasionally go on the rampage and therefore that’s a viable excuse to kill them; if someone, even with our supposed human and essentially basically ostensibly legal and judicial systems rather callously murdered people related to or personally close to you, you too would naturally want revenge; and as I said earlier elephants are exceedingly quite highly intelligent beings and do know the score where humans are concerned. And if they’re constantly being subjected to having their natural habitats callously wilfully and wantonly decreased essentially for western privateers and their rather absurd and acquisitive financial lust masquerading as viable and thus essential necessary conservation, or else to provide locations for obviously an ever extending local population when the right emphasis in such cases should quite essentially be on educative contraception, what exactly are these elephants supposed to do other than strike back. And why is it OK for those in the UK that very avidly support elephant slaughter and so-called big game hunting, egotistically for animal trophies, are the same individuals who both vociferously and adamantly insist “Not in my backyard”  - the so-called NIMBY’s Syndrome �" when they, with their class entrenched reasons, don’t want those whom they perceive as outsiders and therefore not like them, or any constructive development that they similarly abhor and do regard as infra dig to their own perceptions of the good life, intruding on them. Isn't that hypocrisy and most rampantly so?
 
And I’m quite absolutely sure that I’m not the only person who has actually noticed that trophy hunters are always on the right and invariably so the extreme right of the political spectrum. Hardly surprising then that the hereditary titled owner of the Daily Mail, for example, his rag and the plethora of full time and also part time hacks that the Daily Mail employs are all supportive of this bestial activity towards elephants and effectively other forms of so-called “conservation” game hunting. Predictable really, as the Daily Mail actually staunchly supported Nazism, Fascism, Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich during World War II, as well as the vile barbaric slaughter of those myriad numbers of very exceedingly rather hapless and diverse victims; and not just white Caucasian Europeans per se, who among that lot were primarily Zionist but likewise also and attendantly as well their biological kin who were practitioners of Judaism; even though they were clearly all of them exactly of the identical Khazarian ancestry and ethnicity with irrefutably not a drop of Semitic blood amongst them or actually coursing through their respective veins!
 
Never mind however, that they were still mercilessly slaughtered in presumably what was “civilized Europe’s” death and concentration camps; so intelligent folk who can and do think for themselves don’t need any dishonest, disingenuous, outright lying or evidently, rather perniciously and self-serving lectures and/or admonitions from the likes of the Daily Mail.
 
Incredibly, and most insultingly, the Daily Mail has done a 360 degree turn for the full benefit of itself, its manipulated trolls and the surfeit of idiots across the UK, and as well the so-called West, to get them on side; and similarly pretend that the Daily Mail, like numerous others among the UK’s hereditary lot, including members of the British monarchy, were all of them rather unswervingly patriotic and unquestionably British during World War II. The irrefutable truth is, that distinctly they weren’t! And in that regard, were no different from Das Deutsche Freikorps, actually comprised of white Britons, white Canadians, white Irish, white New Zealanders and likewise white Americans who were all of them staunch members and avowedly wholly committed VOLUNTARY MEMBERS of this Third Reich created Waffen SS Unit, which operated in close affinity with the South African Boer one and, as well, the Ukrainian Waffen SS; and whose specified areas of operations were in the European death camps and as assistants to the German High Command. Nazis and outright white supremacists, all of them, who when the war finally ended badly for them ought really to have been  tried and executed for their treason as the Americans and the Russians wanted them to be, but Winston Churchill intervened on their behalf saying that it would look bad on the Allies; so they weren’t. However he had no compunction to William Joyce, aka Lord Haw Haw being very illegally tried for treason, as he wasn’t by any means British and never was, and international law then, as now, stipulates that you can’t be tried for treason by a country doing so, and of which you aren’t or weren’t ever a citizen. But that’s British hypocrisy for you! And quite obviously William Joyce was tried in essentially a kangaroo court by British judges; sentenced to death for treason and executed; while the real British and their kin traitors walked free.  
 
Likewise, hypocrisy and double standards both raised their heads after the end of World War II and are still ongoing in 2023. When the war ended, and a situation as is clearly still ridiculously going on in 2023, came into force with a defeated Germany enforcedly made to make war reparations or compensation, call it what you will, to the victims of its undoubtedly European inspired holocaust, once again the West stepped in hypocritically, and instead of all genuine victims being compensated, just the Zionists and bogus Semites plus their "descendants" were, and are evidently still the only ones so treated. Nothing for the Gypsies or the quite insultingly referred to as the Rhineland N*****s: genuine French citizens of mixed French Caucasian and French African ancestry; and while these preferred white folk who asininely claim to be Semites, when they’re quite absolutely nothing of the kind either biologically or in ancestral terms, simply that they follow a religion, those who do: since most of them are Zionists and anti-religion, in the same way as white Christians likewise follow a Semitic religion; so by their obtuse logic is the Archbishop of Canterbury or the Pope similarly Semites because they're both of them Christian and as it happens are the Heads of their respective churches? Surely not! The term Semitism essentially and as well accurately stems from the fact that all three so-called Semitic religions: Judaism, Christianity and the Islam Faith's, were all formed by genuine Semites, people related to the Palestinians and quite significantly too the Falasha of Ethiopia: undoubtedly the oldest Jewish sect on planet Earth and who’re quite authentically Semites. While European Jews, precisely so like European Christians are converts to their respective religions and simply aren’t biologically, or in any way, ethnically genuine Semites.
 
But they get away with it, because they’re white, and it likewise deflects from the vile and quite stinking hypocrisy of the western leaders and their people, and likewise also masks the toxic and verminous actions of several of them, who wield power in these countries, that they have acquired through blood ties, family associations and as well evidently societal connections with those traitors who claimed they were fighting for and defending Britain but clearly had their other foot firmly planted in Nazi Germany. And for those like David Cameron and his wife, they not only receive compensation for the loss of their ancestors “chattel” �" property �" slaves to the likes of  you and me, in the Caribbean although these said ancestors were massively compensated and in today’s terms those sums run into billions, while the slaves, their children and their descendants to this day haven’t got a single penny; but significantly when it suits David Cameron and Samantha’s farcical as well as repulsive fancies they can also call themselves "Jews"; despite, I would argue, not evidently knowing what the inside of a synagogue does look like, and also benefit thoroughly handsomely, from the German Weidergutmachen Compensation Scheme which compensates simply “Jews”. But I’m quite sure the intelligent among you won’t be surprised to also know, that David and his wife who clearly lost no relatives in the European holocaust, since their forbearers were already well entrenched British, and so were they both subsequently since they were both born in the UK post World War II, see no convincing reasons why Caribbean N*****s as they perceive them, should ever be compensated for the evil, Transatlantic Slave Trade. Who do we pay this money to David once asininely questioned? Adding, that no one living today was involved in the slave trade or owned slaves as it all, in his biased mind, happened quite long before they were ever born. So why is he and as well Samantha receiving compensation for slaves they never had? Why also no such worries on his part when any Zionist from Russia or regardless of wherever they hail from in the rest of Europe literally can and does claim most routinely and likewise too on the Weidergutmachen Scheme?
 
The Daily Mail has similarly got away with murder and is still doing so, with its racist, evidently white supremacist and distinctly, irrefutably, purposely divisive propaganda quite clearly masquerading as news; and through its clickbait regime solicits both financially and ideologically from the likes of all you intellectually challenged morons just what it needs; an agenda, which is no different from its World War II one; and the hacks who likemindedly do work for it, and the evidently rather similarly indoctrinated,  without principles of any kind morons just like yourselves are equally as distinctively criminally complicit as the Daily Mail itself.
 
So fully cognizant as I most undoubtedly am that despite being as highly intelligent and resourceful as they are no elephant if left alone will instinctively become a killer beast, unlike the so-called civilized human beings that rather, quite regrettably infest this Earth with their evil, vile and evidently toxic and absolutely verminous presence but who couldn’t be any further from being any such thing, as these beautiful, literally graceful and highly intelligent beings are, that unquestionably, most wholeheartedly, emphatically and quite unapologetically I’ll side with the elephants every time!

Author's Note

As per previous works.